Government shutdown

Jump to Last Post 1-10 of 10 discussions (55 posts)
  1. profile image77
    Hxprofposted 3 months ago

    What are the horrors America can expect when the federal government is shut down?

    1. RTalloni profile image92
      RTalloniposted 3 months agoin reply to this

      If you are speaking of the current chatter, none. Of course, if you are speaking of a permanent situation due to unforeseen circumstances we would all have trouble picking up the pieces, many would even die for various reasons.

    2. promisem profile image97
      promisemposted 3 months agoin reply to this

      1. Many government and civilian contractor employees go without pay, which damages the economy because they aren't spending money.

      2. Closure of fee-based services, such as national parks, which reduces government revenue and expands the skyrocketing deficit.

      3. Delays in the approval of new life-saving drugs.

      4. A lovely new rule from the Trump tax cut automatically cuts Medicare and other programs if the shutdown lasts long enough.

      Shutdowns always have a negative impact on GDP. It just depends on the length of the shutdown.

      1. wilderness profile image96
        wildernessposted 3 months agoin reply to this

        I would have to say that #2 is true; we will lose a few dollars from fee based parks.

        And if #1 is also true - that some people will not be paid - then we will save huge barrels of borrowed money, cutting the deficit far more than the handful we lose from park visitors could ever supply.  (You might want to consider that our parks are NOT self-sustaining with those fees - shut down the park and the savings is considerably more than the income lost.)

        1. promisem profile image97
          promisemposted 3 months agoin reply to this

          For #2, the actual total is $500 million. Not a few dollars.

          And I said "such as" the parks. They aren't the only government service that generates fees.

          If people aren't paid, they don't spend and boost the economy.

          1. wilderness profile image96
            wildernessposted 3 months agoin reply to this

            $500 million.  For lost fees for a few days of shut down.

            Sorry - I'd have to see those figures from the govt. to believe them.  Maybe for a few months, but we've never been shut down for more than a few days.

            You don't "boost the economy" by spending money that is simply taken from one person and given to another.  As in taxes.  The money will be spent by either the person earning it or the person that gets it, but either way it will be spent.

            1. promisem profile image97
              promisemposted 3 months agoin reply to this

              Where did I say "a few days of shut down"?

              I think it's better to do research and use facts in such discussions rather than guessing and cherry picking.

              The lost $500 million came from last shutdown in 2013:

              https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-mete … -shutdown/

              The cost is $76 million per day:

              https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol … t/2957033/

              If the economy doesn't get a boost from spending, then how does it get a boost if the money just sits there in a bank?

  2. hard sun profile image88
    hard sunposted 3 months ago

    This "fake media" article seems pretty thorough. well sourced, and reasonable. I'm glad the National Parks will remain open with a partial shutdown. It sucks to plan a trip then have the park closed. But, doesn't Trump say we can't ever take CNN seriously?

    https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/13/politics … index.html

    1. hard sun profile image88
      hard sunposted 3 months agoin reply to this

      I misinterpreted the ranger's statement here. Indeed, it seems it depends on the park.

  3. Rochelle Frank profile image95
    Rochelle Frankposted 3 months ago

    I live near Yosemite, and local news says even if the shutdown goes into effect the park will be open and visitors will "not notice the difference".

    1. promisem profile image97
      promisemposted 3 months agoin reply to this

      It depends on the park. Some that have fees will stay open, but you'll be able to go in without paying anything. Others will be closed.

      Keep in mind that a "national park" includes historical sites. If those sites have buildings, they will close such as visitor centers at Gettysburg and other locations.

      Rangers won't be available for safety and to act as guides. Restrooms won't get cleaned. No food at the major sites.

      1. wilderness profile image96
        wildernessposted 3 months agoin reply to this

        You're right - it depends on the park.  Obama chose to close those areas that would have the highest impact on visitors in a political ploy to anger people that those terrible Republicans closed the govt.

        Perhaps Trump will limit the damage rather than making it as high as possible.

        1. promisem profile image97
          promisemposted 3 months agoin reply to this

          Is that your an opnion or a provable fact?

          1. wilderness profile image96
            wildernessposted 3 months agoin reply to this

            Go back and look at which "parks" he closed.  You can start with those around the mall area in DC and have very low costs associated with them, per visitor.  Yes, it's provable if you care to look and are honest.  Are you?

            1. promisem profile image97
              promisemposted 3 months agoin reply to this

              No, you post what parks he closed other than simply and conveniently claiming without any proof that he just closed the DC parks.

              You are the one who made the claim. So back up it up if you are honest. Are you?

              1. wilderness profile image96
                wildernessposted 3 months agoin reply to this

                Do you not recall shutting down the mall exhibits (Lincoln Memorial, Washington monument, etc.) and the cries from thousands of tourists that could not view our history as a result?  I also recall shutting off the only access to privately owned homes inside parks as well - do you?

                Because I'm pretty sure you DO recall that, and simply wish to put a stumbling block into the discussion.  Not much interested in refreshing your memory if you don't, though.

                1. promisem profile image97
                  promisemposted 3 months agoin reply to this

                  What in the world does that venting have to do with my original post showing what happens in a shutdown?

                  A couple of random examples also has nothing to do with a baseless claim that he targeted certain parks for political gain.

                  Besides, you said a shutdown is just for "a few days", so what does it matter?

                  1. wilderness profile image96
                    wildernessposted 3 months agoin reply to this

                    You aren't following the train.  It concerns which parks are closed and what is saved in costs per visitor.  Obama closed those least costly, but with the most public impact.  Perhaps Trump will do the opposite.

          2. Ken Burgess profile image90
            Ken Burgessposted 3 months agoin reply to this

            Fund the Wall, the big beautiful wall... make it Huuuuuuuuuuuuuge... and the government won't be shut down, simple enough.

            De-fund the entire government, especially Congress, the useless windbags... out of the ten trillion a year they are spending, I am sure a measly .oo5% can be set aside for the wall.

            1. promisem profile image97
              promisemposted 3 months agoin reply to this

              I'm sure you'll be surprised to hear that I strongly favor border security and strongly oppose illegal immigration.

              That said, a whole lot of smart people say a wall is a waste of money because of tunnels and sneaking into the country on boats.

              As I have said on here before, enforce the law against businesses that hire them. No jobs, no illegals.

              Business fines are a great way to increase federal revenue at a time when deficits are skyrocketing.

              1. wilderness profile image96
                wildernessposted 3 months agoin reply to this

                And a whole lot of other countries (66, I believe) think that those smart people aren't so smart after all...as they build and continue to build walls.

                But which is easier - wading a shallow (used to be) river and walking in unopposed or digging a tunnel from 50 yards inland, under that river AND wall AND 50 yards inland on the other side and crawling through that?

                Which is easier - wading a shallow (used to be) river and walking in unopposed or boating the ocean in plain view for 25-50 miles?

                Maybe, just maybe, what is very difficult will halt some of the trespassers?

                1. crankalicious profile image92
                  crankaliciousposted 3 months agoin reply to this

                  It would be so much easier to go after businesses that hire illegals. The motivation for people to come here is work. Remove the motivation and they'll stop coming.

                2. promisem profile image97
                  promisemposted 3 months agoin reply to this

                  Yeah, walls are a great idea if they are 500 feet tall and paid for by Mexico, as Trump promised. But don't fine the businesses that hire the illegals.

                  https://hubstatic.com/14338276.jpg


                  https://hubstatic.com/14338277.jpg

                  1. wilderness profile image96
                    wildernessposted 3 months agoin reply to this

                    Oh, I wouldn't just fine businesses; I'd suggest that by the third offence the fine should be all the assets of the company.  With some lenience for companies with 50 locations and 50 managers doing the hiring.

                    1st offence: 6 months profit, from IRS filings, or $50,000
                    2nd offence: 1 years profit, from IRS filings, or $100,000.
                    3rd offence: confiscation of the company.  Or perhaps the location for large corporations.

                    But that has to be dependent on an effective method of determining legality of an employee.  So far we don't really have it.

                    But I notice you didn't reply to the point: walls are harder to cross than a ditch and start walking.  Except to be sarcastic and dismissive about a 500' tall wall - was that because you don't want to discuss the inanity of comparing a strong, monitored wall with nothing at all?

  4. Kenna McHugh profile image89
    Kenna McHughposted 3 months ago

    Yawn

    1. promisem profile image97
      promisemposted 3 months agoin reply to this

      Thank you.

    2. profile image77
      Hxprofposted 3 months agoin reply to this

      I think you hit the nail on the head.  For all of the hubub that's being made over this shutdown, it's really nothing to get worked up over.

      1. promisem profile image97
        promisemposted 3 months agoin reply to this

        True, if you don't care about screwing up the economy for the sake of Trump's ego.

        1. wilderness profile image96
          wildernessposted 3 months agoin reply to this

          LOL  Whose ego was responsible for all the other shutdowns, and the threats of shutdowns as well?

          1. promisem profile image97
            promisemposted 3 months agoin reply to this

            The President who said on national TV that he was shutting down the government after rejecting a bipartisan plan to keep it open.

            1. crankalicious profile image92
              crankaliciousposted 3 months agoin reply to this

              I don't really mind that Trump is fighting for what he believes in nor do I hold that against any other politician. If you want what you believe in and think it's important, then pick the fight.

              I think it's possible Trump is making a mistake by doing it because the Republicans will be blamed, but I also think it's possible people will hold the Democrats responsible for continuing to look like they don't take border security and illegal immigration seriously. They need to get on the right side of that issue.

  5. hard sun profile image88
    hard sunposted 3 months ago

    "Even the Border Patrol agents and Transportation Security Administration officials who are directed to continue working during the shutdown will not be paid until Congress funds their agencies."

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics … smsnnews11

    1. wilderness profile image96
      wildernessposted 3 months agoin reply to this

      Have to wonder just how legal it is to demand employees work without pay.  Even if one assumes they WILL be paid one day, it is still far beyond their agreed upon pay date.

      1. hard sun profile image88
        hard sunposted 3 months agoin reply to this

        Yeah. It's certainly shady to work without knowing when that next check will come. I guess it's legal if the powers that be say it is, especially with it being the government. With all the lawsuits flying every which way, state laws differing, and decisions being reversed by higher courts, it's difficult to tell what's legal these days. I'm not sure exactly how much this is different than it used to be, but it seems things are a lot more muddled than they were say 20 years ago. It's likely a reflection of the hyper partisan politics.

        1. wilderness profile image96
          wildernessposted 3 months agoin reply to this

          Agree.  It seems the powers-that-be can do whatever they want.

  6. Wesman Todd Shaw profile image97
    Wesman Todd Shawposted 3 months ago

    We can expect persons with IQ scores far below average, and fake Hubpages profile names to act like children in the forums. Exactly like every other day.

    1. hard sun profile image88
      hard sunposted 3 months agoin reply to this

      I only see one profile from those commenting on this thread that doesn't reflect a real name. I'd love to have my forum nickname match with my real name on my profile, but I don't think there's a way to change that.

      If there is a way, it would be great to know how.

      1. wilderness profile image96
        wildernessposted 3 months agoin reply to this

        I agree.  Wish I could get my name on there rather than what was chosen years ago with anonymity in mind.  It shows on the hubs, why not the forum posts?

      2. Wesman Todd Shaw profile image97
        Wesman Todd Shawposted 3 months agoin reply to this

        I wasn't thinking of you at all. I'm willing to bet you could name some persons I was thinking of though.

        1. promisem profile image97
          promisemposted 3 months agoin reply to this

          Do you mean readmikenow? But if you are referring to me, just click on my profile link to see my full name. I have nothing to hide.

        2. hard sun profile image88
          hard sunposted 3 months agoin reply to this

          Yeah, I can figure it out, lol. I just took the chance to get out my grievance with the forum nickname issue. It's good to for me not to bottle these things up...ha.

        3. crankalicious profile image92
          crankaliciousposted 3 months agoin reply to this

          As an aside about anonymity. Have you ever had your life threatened online? I have. Not saying I took it all that seriously, but it happened. So feel free to call me out for keeping my real name off these forums. I don't really care.

    2. crankalicious profile image92
      crankaliciousposted 3 months agoin reply to this

      Could you provide a list of those with low IQ scores? I'd like to avoid those people.

  7. JAKE Earthshine profile image79
    JAKE Earthshineposted 3 months ago

    Maybe I missed something over the last few years while this atrocious nightmare has played out, but please tell me WHEN is the last time Circus Clown Bozo Trump tried to limit the damage of anything ?? On the contrary, his sick little mind appears to be all about maximum disturbance: Perhaps in an alternative fake universe he acted normally and rationally but not here in our once great nation called the USA:

    Government workers will not get paid around Christmas time and many aspects of OUR government will cease to function at 100% which is NOt good and makes us vulnerable to our enemies but what else is new with this guy, all this just so a grotesque looking narcissist perched in the oval office who appears to ONLY care about personal gain, can tell neo-white nationalists like Ann Coulter, Sean Hammity and Rush Limpy that he tried to get billions for a useless pile of concrete which a $50 ladder could breach:

    YES, take the mantle Bozo because YOU own it: BTW, a 2,000 mile pile of concrete really has nothing to do with 'border security' and everything to do with a place to try and plaster the Trump logo and please, try to keep your legs in an acceptable position when talking to REAL leaders like Speaker Pelosi and Senator Schumer, not like you're watching an adult film premiere at the local movie house and please try to keep your tiny little hands which have been God knows where, at your side or in your lap when talking in public:

    YOU own the shut down BOZO:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SP-q3KxCopM

  8. Readmikenow profile image95
    Readmikenowposted 3 months ago

    What would happen if the government remains shut down...and NOTHING happens?  Would that mean we can identify some government department that could be merged or eliminated?  This may turn out to be a long-term cost savings solution.

    1. JAKE Earthshine profile image79
      JAKE Earthshineposted 3 months agoin reply to this

      I think we've already identified one position which should be eliminated yesterday, it's called the presidency, at least until he's officially REMOVED:

    2. gmwilliams profile image83
      gmwilliamsposted 7 weeks agoin reply to this

      +100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

  9. psycheskinner profile image85
    psycheskinnerposted 3 months ago

    For my friends waiting to see what happens on payday this is not abstract

  10. newsitics profile image59
    newsiticsposted 2 months ago

    So now that polling shows that the majority of Americans blame Trump and Republicans for the Government shutdown, when do you think he will fold?

    1. profile image77
      Hxprofposted 2 months agoin reply to this

      Trump might be looking for some way out of this that will allow him to save face, or he might not seriously be considering it.  My take is that public opinion would have to sour a bit more before he'd cry uncle.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)