Here we go. Debate #2 Day #2 of the Democrat Candidates Debate.
Hey, The National DNC speaker, (he also spoke last night - the first night of debates), is a great speaker. What an energetic guy. He is very well suited to his job.
Pre-debate hubbub is about whether Biden can shake the "old man," (not just by age or ideas, but by actual perception), perception that many pundits think has attached itself to him.
Hey this DNC chairman, Tom Pacer, is a hellufva speaker.
Off we go . . .
de Blasio -*sigh predictable and a nothinburger.
Bennet - classrooms not cages, who is this guy?
Inslee: national mobilization? We can do big things? Ugh.
Gillibrand: We need a nominee . . . but not her.
Gabbard: Justice and equality, of by and for the people . . . ehhh. . .
Castro: I will work hard every single day . . . yawn . . .
Yang: I want to give every American $1000 a month. How do we pay for it? Not with Mr. Yang's ideas.
Booker: Oh hell, it's the Baltimore issue - hecklers interrupt, then, who are we as a people . . . ehhh . . . .
Harris: Question; "Who are we, answer, we are better than this." I like it.
Biden: "I am running for president to restore the soul of this country." Challenged president to see what America is. We are not going to leave it to you. I like it.
Harris on healthcare, I like it. But, Biden doesn't, now it's a battle of details.
Harris says her plan addresses everyone, Harris says his plan leaves out 10 million people.
Ouch, Biden hits back with stats. $3 Trillion costs - score +1 Biden.
Blasio jumps in - limp biscuit, folks angry at private healthcare.
Biden ends with fix Obamacare, not Medicare for all.
Gillibrand: People can't afford healthcare - good point.
Harris response to Biden: Analysis says her health plan is studied to be workable and yours is not.
Biden: if you like your plan you should be able to keep it. Score; +1 Biden
Booker on healthcare, yawn.
Moving on . . .
OMG! Healthcare argument; de Blasio, Bennet, Biden. Biden says it's a bunch of malarky! Way to go Joe. +1 Biden.
Harris: Decriminalize illegal border crossings - "it's all about the children . . ." -1 Harris.
Hells bells, this is too much work, you folks watch for yourselves.
GA you seem impartial to Biden.
I hope the Democrats come up with someone else, Biden is not going to sell to the people on the fence, 'Creepy Old Joe' will become the common theme, his 40+ years of D.C. politics is not a sellable point, people are sick and tired of old politics and old politicians.
And Biden is not going to be able to handle Trump, Biden got wiped by Paul Ryan in the VP debates years ago, he isn't going to sway America by fumbling around in his debates with Trump.
Biden certainly cannot outlie Trump by any means, if that's what you mean, Ken. I think we all can agree on that...
I am at this point Ken. The other serious contenders are too far left for me.
Except, maybe, if . . Warren. I am really disappointed with the far-left platforms she has taken on to pander to very progressive Democrats.
Hopefully, if she does get the nomination maybe the pragmatist in her will realize the danger of those radical ideas relative to the moderate and Independent voters that she will need to win the election.
As you may know, I watch almost no tv these days, so what part of the debates I have seen have been from YouTube videos.
I watched a very interesting video made by a young man that identifies as a liberal, if you have the time take a look, I am interested on you take:
I don't think Biden will create the excitement necessary to defeat Trump either. He needed to define himself without evoking Obama, which he did not. He needed to show that he isn't out of touch, but massacred his own website in the closing remarks.
The first thing Kirsten Nielsen will do as president is "fumigate the White House."
Kushner's properties are known for being infested with both rats and fleas according to the latest reports. He does visit the WH frequently....
And I assume you meant Kirsten Gillibrand, Pretty?
Kirsten Gillibrand's attack on Biden regarding working women made her look desperate. I was rolling my eyes the whole time.
I thought Biden held his own considering everyone was out to get him.
Harris didn't do a great job of defending her health care plan. It was confusing.
Cory Booker finally came off well for a change,
Overall, though, I think Warren's showing the previous night eclipsed everyone.
Harris also took the low road in her comments after the debate. Instead of responding to Gabbard's criticism of her record as a prosecutor, she childishly the veteran an "Assad apologist". It seems she's opening herself up for more problems by wading into a foreign policy arena that she's not equipped for.
by FitnezzJim 4 years ago
Should the Commission on Presidential Debates lose its tax-exempt status?Politico.com is reporting (September 2, 2016) that the Libertarian VP nominee claims the Commission on Presidential Debates could lose tax exempt status by excluding Libertarians from the 2016 presidential debates. The...
by dashingscorpio 6 years ago
Have you ever changed your voting plans based upon a presidential debate?Do you believe any presidential debate could cause a conservative to vote for a liberal or vice versa? Are these really "sporting events" for voters to cheer for (their team) whenever their "person" gets...
by Nathan Orf 8 years ago
Who do you think will do better in the Presidential Debates, Obama or Romney?Now that the Conventions are over, we can get back to the actual campaigns. A key part of both campaigns is to nail the Presidential Debates. Will the President do better, or will Romney? Why do you think so?
by Charlu 8 years ago
Why is it Presidential debates have to be on every channel? I feel like a child being punished.Seriously, do they have to be on every channel? Do they think that we are not smart enough to turn to the right one, tape it, or watch it online afterwards? It's as if I'm a child being punished who...
by SportsBetter 8 years ago
In the Presidential debates, behind the person asking questions the background is blacked out. Why?
by dafla 12 years ago
What is this thing with Palin being so shielded from the press? Evidently, they don't want her asked about the investigation into "alleged" wrongdoing in the troopergate scandal. I'm thinking maybe she is the one orchestrating this, because I can't see her going along with...
Copyright © 2021 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|