Why NYC allow 1 million students to protest climate change on a school

Jump to Last Post 1-3 of 3 discussions (24 posts)
  1. jackclee lm profile image80
    jackclee lmposted 2 months ago

    Shouldn’t they be in school learning about this issue rather than protesting in the streets?
    If they did, perhaps they will learn that climate change science is very complex and the solutions are illusive at best.

    The teachers have not done a good job framing this issue. Instead, they are brain washing these kids and scaring them to act out.

    1. Sharlee01 profile image87
      Sharlee01posted 2 months agoin reply to this

      It could benefit children of all ages to learn about the many facets of climate. Perhaps the school could offer the day off, but give the students the opportunity to either join the protest or take the day to do some research on climate control. There are lots of scientific studies on the subject. The day should not require students to attend a protest unless they want to attend. Hate to think we are forcing our children into any form of government control.

  2. AliciaC profile image97
    AliciaCposted 2 months ago

    Missing one day of school won’t hurt the students' study of climate change or affect their academic success. They belong to the generation that will have to live with some of the decisions made by older people today. They deserve a chance to present their point of view.

    Your last paragraph appears to show the real motivation for your post. The idea that the teachers of all of the thousands of students involved in the protest are doing a bad job in educating them about climate change is hard to believe. I suspect that what you really mean is you don’t want teachers to present information about climate change that you disagree with and you want them to present information that you do agree with.

    You should present your concerns to the New York Department of Education (or whatever the organization that regulates curriculum is called in New York). This is the route that you should take instead of making the accusations in your last sentence. Where I live, the department of education determines the curriculum that teachers must follow. I imagine the process is the same in New York.

    1. Castlepaloma profile image74
      Castlepalomaposted 2 months agoin reply to this

      Agree

    2. Live to Learn profile image80
      Live to Learnposted 2 months agoin reply to this

      I'm no certain the opinion of a 12 year old bears enough weight to warrant a day out of school.

      Plus, it isn't really their opinion we'd be hearing, anyway.

      1. AliciaC profile image97
        AliciaCposted 2 months agoin reply to this

        I’m used to teaching high school students and have no doubt in my mind that they should be allowed to miss school to go to events such as the New York protest. I do agree that the decision becomes harder with students of elementary school age, though.

        I don’t think we should assume that a twelve-year-old can’t think about climate change carefully and make their own decision about the topic, but I do think that age is something that schools should discuss carefully when considering whether to give students permission to attend certain events (and, of course, when discussing certain topics with them).

        1. Live to Learn profile image80
          Live to Learnposted 2 months agoin reply to this

          I agree that a child of that age can have an independent thought. I just don't think the vast majority do. I think teachers teach, most kids regurgitate what they've been told, on command. Few possess critical thinking skills at that age.

        2. Castlepaloma profile image74
          Castlepalomaposted 2 months agoin reply to this

          Had not thought a protest about climate change would be a great place to get a hard knocks education on the natural environment.
          Good thinking teacher.

        3. jackclee lm profile image80
          jackclee lmposted 2 months agoin reply to this

          As a teacher, do you support the showing of Al Gore’s documentary on global warming - An Inconvenient Truth?

          1. AliciaC profile image97
            AliciaCposted 2 months agoin reply to this

            It's an old documentary that I haven't seen in many years. I don't remember much of its contents. I wouldn't take the time to watch it now in order to refresh my memory because I'm sure climate science has advanced since the documentary was made. For this reason, I wouldn't show it myself.

            1. jackclee lm profile image80
              jackclee lmposted 2 months agoin reply to this

              If you did watch it now, you will realize it was full of exaggerations and nothing that was predicted came true...
              I attend a talk last year at the LDEO where a speaker admitted he choose his career in climate studies mainly due to watching that film in grade school.

    3. promisem profile image98
      promisemposted 2 months agoin reply to this

      Very well said.

    4. jackclee lm profile image80
      jackclee lmposted 2 months agoin reply to this

      I have been following climate change for over 20 years. I am positive this AGW has been politicized and have little to do with real science. When our public school starts indoctrinating students instead of teaching and presenting the facts, and outlining what we do know and what we don’t know, it is hard for anyone to be objective.
      Why not use this day in a more productive way. Have a debate of top scientists...and let them present their case and explain how and why the models are missing their projections.

      Let me ask you this. What if in 10 years, the dire predictions do not materialize? What then? How should our society react to an over zealous environmental group?

      1. AliciaC profile image97
        AliciaCposted 2 months agoin reply to this

        Inviting scientists into schools to discuss climate change is a great idea. The more information that students get about the situation, the better. Visitors from different institutions should give students a wide variety of information and points of view. A question and answer session with the scientists after their presentations would be a great idea, too. 

        In response to the rest of your comment, I’ll say the following. What if in 10 years the predictions have materialized and we’ve done nothing to stop the problems? What then?

        1. jackclee lm profile image80
          jackclee lmposted 2 months agoin reply to this

          You are assuming we have the power to influence something as complex and as huge as climate...
          A better answer to my question would be, we don’t need to wait 10 years. It has already happened. The predictions made 15 years ago by climate experts all turned out to be wrong on the high side. Don’t you think we should ask those same people what happened? What went wrong with their 30 plus computer models? Before going down the same path?

          1. Castlepaloma profile image74
            Castlepalomaposted 2 months agoin reply to this

            You only need 80% of the consciousness of the public to make possitive change to over throw the POWER of the Government.

            You have 97% of scientists claiming there is global warming greatly cause by mankind.

            Are these 97% scientists ethier have no conscious or completely  stupid.
            Which one is it Jack?

            1. jackclee lm profile image80
              jackclee lmposted 2 months agoin reply to this

              The 97% is a false number. Go look it up how this number came about...
              The disagreement is much higher in the community...and also, disagreement on how to deal with it over the long haul.
              Like 30-100 years, not 10-20...
              The problem with the current IPCC and the climate change community is that they have been politicized by the environmental extremists.
              If this was strictly about science and the most economic solution is converting to nuclear energy as Andrew Wang proposed...why is that rejected?
              If you can answer that, you are well on your way on understanding this issue.

              1. promisem profile image98
                promisemposted 2 months agoin reply to this
                1. jackclee lm profile image80
                  jackclee lmposted 2 months agoin reply to this

                  Yes, like many government agencies...even NASA, there are senior members who are political...I also include some that work at NOAA and the EPA...

                  1. promisem profile image98
                    promisemposted 2 months agoin reply to this

                    OK, prove that NASA is wrong.

                2. jackclee lm profile image80
                  jackclee lmposted 2 months agoin reply to this

                  Here are some former NASA employees who disagree...
                  https://www.iceagenow.info/nasa-scienti … -activism/

                  1. Castlepaloma profile image74
                    Castlepalomaposted 2 months agoin reply to this

                    https://youtu.be/kHp0ph37QRk

                    Trump has cut NASA so bad, that scientist can not afford hair stylist

              2. Castlepaloma profile image74
                Castlepalomaposted 2 months agoin reply to this

                Why don't you provide the evidences for the 97% fakes?. I am too sick and tired of facing toxic phonies.

                My communities dose what ever it takes, for their health first and health of the planet. Health is wealth or you got nothing.

                Top three threats for humanity is ....Environment, Poverty & Nuclear radiation in that order. Nazi's came up with the idea that muster gas and radiation cures cancer, check out their death rap sheet.

                Bill Gates wants to reduce the world population to 500 million and replace all energy to nuclear. If he gets his wish on both, it will come true.  He's got the wang number.
                Did that answer your question?

                If politics at the source of fake science why did Trump and whitehouse refuse to do anything about the environment.

                If my body is a science thermometer freezing as a child and sweating as a senior that is evidence enough. I lost snow sculpture  business due to warm weather.

                I am well on my way with my grassroot entrepreneurs furthering solution from 60 to 100 years of system environment failures.

  3. Castlepaloma profile image74
    Castlepalomaposted 2 months ago

    https://youtu.be/kHp0ph37QRk

    I have searched the internet for a few former NASA denier of global warming.
    Everything one of them did not say there is no Global warming from their horses mouth.

    I agree there are Politicians looking to line their pocket with exgarrations.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)