What I Wanted to Hear During the House Impeachment Speeches

Jump to Last Post 1-2 of 2 discussions (15 posts)
  1. crankalicious profile image94
    crankaliciousposted 16 months ago

    I listened to both Democrats and Republicans get up and give the same speech as they prepared to vote on articles of impeachment. Democrats got up and gave the same speech: our President should be impeached because he did bad things. Republicans got up and gave the same speech: the process is unfair and the President did nothing wrong and this is all a sham.

    One after another, every single politician came up and toed their respective party line. We only needed two total speeches because everything that followed was exactly the same depending on whether you were a Democrat or a Republican.

    Here's what I wanted to hear from somebody, anybody:

    "Regardless of party, we are all here to work for the people of the United States and we have stopped doing that. We are growing ever more partisan. We can no longer even agree on the definition of truth and facts. The American people do not expect us to stand up here and argue and get nothing done. They expect us to work. Despite our differences, they expect us to come to agreement on what we can and move forward. Ironically, there is more that we agree upon to move this country forward than what we disagree on, yet we choose to fight and disagree. We're taking the easy way out. Instead of fighting for each other, we're fighting against each other. It's much easier to ignore our political opponents than it is to work together and find common ground. The American people want us to work together. Whether you believe in impeachment or not, what is happening to today is progress toward the destruction of our country. It's time for us to stop fighting, to start working, and to start taking the smallest of step to figure out how we can come together and move this country forward. If we don't, our Democracy and our Republic will cease to exist."

    1. wilderness profile image96
      wildernessposted 16 months agoin reply to this

      The minority leader had considerably more to say.  Perhaps because he was the only Republican (that I saw) granted more than 30 seconds to speak.  On the other hand, Pelosi had no more to say that the rest of the Democrats did in the 2 minutes they had.

      1. crankalicious profile image94
        crankaliciousposted 16 months agoin reply to this

        All I heard was partisan bickering, a bunch of people with no awareness that they had zero chance of convincing those on the other side of anything. They seemed unaware that working together on something would be more productive than arguing on and on. But perhaps that's just a reflection of the American people. We just want them to fight. We won't re-elect anyone who doesn't put down the other side. We want our alternate facts and our conspiracy theories and our pipe dreams and we want our politicians to take no prisoners.

        1. wilderness profile image96
          wildernessposted 16 months agoin reply to this

          I don't think they tried to convince their peers of anything - not with the partisanship that was so obvious.  Instead they were trying (and failing) to speak to the cameras in the hope of convincing a gullible nation that pure partisan voting (less the two D's in areas voting Trump) proves the other party has to be wrong.

          1. crankalicious profile image94
            crankaliciousposted 16 months agoin reply to this

            I didn't see a single person acting on behalf of the American people and recognizing that things, regardless of your opinion on impeachment, are going very wrong.

            As hard as it is to believe, most of us agree on many more things than we disagree on, yet we choose to focus on those things that we disagree on and politicians, even more so.

            I think our politicians need to go back to the basics and work forward.

            As I have said previously, if things continue to go in this direction, we will lose our country. We'll either swing toward dictatorship or toward socialism. This is what happens when you respond to the fringes and not to the mainstream.

            1. wilderness profile image96
              wildernessposted 16 months agoin reply to this

              I didn't see anything on behalf of the country, either.  Again, the minority leader came close but still failed; what he had to say might have merit but was still based on super partisanship.

              We took a baby step in correction when we elected Trump.  Do it again with a hundred or so representatives and the message may get through.  May.

              1. crankalicious profile image94
                crankaliciousposted 16 months agoin reply to this

                Well, we disagree on the election of Trump as a correction of anything. However, electing Clinton would have been worse from the perspective of sending a message to the politicians that we're fed up with "politics as usual", so if that's the message, that may be okay.

                I just don't think electing horrible people is a recipe for anything other than disaster. Shouldn't the President reflect the country in both temperament, intelligence, and grace? Maybe I'm dreaming.

                That said, the election of Trump may, in fact, make things worse, particularly if it motivates the left to move in some kind of insane direction.

                Being partisan for a moment, I know Trump supporters are touting his economic record and I can't disagree that things are good now. However, go look at the deficit. We're seeing a repeat of the Bush years. Trump got his big tax cut on the backs of the American worker and we're all going to pay the price soon. The promised economic uptick hasn't occurred. Things are slowing. Look at it however you like - massive government spending followed by massive tax cuts is going to result in bad things.

                1. wilderness profile image96
                  wildernessposted 16 months agoin reply to this

                  Yes, that was the message - no more "politics as usual".

                  I'd have to hesitate to say that we should have a president that "reflects the country" in temperament or grace.  Or intelligence - I expect more there.  As far as the other two - are you discussing the culture, the temperament and grace, of the Hillbillies of Kentucky?  The oligarchs of Wall Street?  If it's the Great Unwashed Middle Class, would that be from the streets of Richmond, Va. or the farms of Iowa and Kansas?

                  Point being that there is no national temperament or grace to reflect.  For every person you might choose as representative there will be 100 voices crying different.

                  1. Randy Godwin profile image61
                    Randy Godwinposted 16 months agoin reply to this

                    But Trump is low class in any part of the country, Dan.

                  2. crankalicious profile image94
                    crankaliciousposted 16 months agoin reply to this


                    How very liberal of you - the idea that the country is made up of many different types of people and no one person can represent the entire country is a concept scholars have been teaching for decades and a concept not widely accepted by the right, so congratulations!

                    That said, education, intelligence, and grace are generally concepts with widely accepted meanings, so to imply such definitions are simply more "alternative facts" is no truthful. However, I do very much appreciate you recognizing that America is a collective of many different kinds of people.

  2. ginosblog profile image68
    ginosblogposted 16 months ago

    Maybe you have not checked to see what exactly President Trump has done for the country w/o help from the perspective Parties, and listening to this bs since before he was even elected. I am sure though, you could have done better, right? He has done a fantastic job w/o the backing a President is supposed to have.
    The money that has been wasted since he was elected by the Democrat's could have placed most ot the homeless under a roof with food.
    So you are saying lets keep the Border's open, continue with one oversight committee after another, pay welfare to illegal's and so on. Is that right?
    What words would actually make a difference on the way things are? Schiff and his buddies have told one lie after another and wrote the impeachment articles on exactly what they did and you want to hear more empty words. Personally, I have heard more words than I thought could be thrown and people believing themselves when everytime they opened their mouths you knew they were lying.

    1. Randy Godwin profile image61
      Randy Godwinposted 16 months agoin reply to this

      You support a daily liar but don't like others to take his cue? BWAHAHA lol

    2. crankalicious profile image94
      crankaliciousposted 16 months agoin reply to this

      I could respond to you point by point and refute everything you've said. However, you are entirely missing the point of this particular forum, which is not surprising. You can read my other post in this forum for information on the economy.


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)