Former national security adviser John Bolton reportedly claims in his as yet unpublished memoir that President Trump sought to tie hundreds of millions of dollars in aid to Ukraine to his requests for the country's leaders to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden.
Trump told Bolton in August, according to a transcript of Bolton's forthcoming book reviewed by the Times, "that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats including the Bidens."
The book, which does not have a publication date as of yet, has been submitted to the White House for review. White House officials did not immediately return a request for comment from The Hill on the report.
Bolton's lawyer confirmed the authenticity of the Times's report in a tweet, writing that he regretted that excerpts had been leaked during the classification and review process.
Are you still OK with no witnesses? Would you rather wait for the book? Is Bolton part of the Deep State liberal mafia too?
I suspect Bolton is playing a game with the timing of both his book and his potential testimony.
What a shock - to think that someone would play games with the removal of a duly elected president!
That's not what I'm saying, although I understand why you would want to jump to that conclusion.
I just think he's trying to maximize sales for his book.
"duly" is subjective. And we don't want a criminal POTUS, do you?
Bolton could be the smoking gun if this is true.
I am not sure how to find someone's twitter account, so I couldn't find the mentioned tweet from Bolton's lawyer confirming the leaked information, but I did find another 'The Hill' article, (maybe the same one quoted?), that included this blurb:
"The attorney's statement stopped short of confirming the contents of the Times' report. Cooper did not respond to requests for comment from The Hill."
Source: Bolton lawyer slams 'corrupted' White House review process after book leak
Does anybody know how to find that lawyer's "confirming tweet"?
Otherwise, it seems The Hill is saying the lawyer confirmed there was a leak, but not the contents of the leak.
Either way, it's a hot potato. Let's see who's lap it lands in.
I dont think it was a tweet.
On December 30, 2019, I submitted, on behalf of Ambassador Bolton, a book manuscript to the National Security Council’s Records Management Division for standard prepublication security review for classified information. As explained in my cover letter to Ellen J. Knight, Senior Director of the Records Management Division, we submitted the manuscript notwithstanding our firm belief that the manuscript contained no information that could reasonably be considered classified and on the assurance that the 'process of reviewing submitted materials is restricted to those career government officials and employees regularly charged with responsibility for such reviews' and that the 'contents of Ambassador Bolton’s manuscript will not be reviewed or otherwise disclosed to any persons not regularly involved in that process.'"
Bolton's team declined to "speculate" to Fox News as to how a description of his manuscript might have leaked to the Times. Additionally, Bolton's representatives made clear he was not denying the Times' claim concerning the Ukraine aid holdup and the possible investigation of the Bidens. - FoxNews
This was a dirty trick by the Democrats. His manuscript was sent for review, which means it has many changes that can be made to it. Now, his attorney claims the White House leaked the information? I would like to ask his attorney why such an allegation with no proof? How would the White House benefit from it? Seems like another unsubstantiated claim.
Also, I say, so what? The United States ties aid with all sorts of conditions. The bottom line is this is nothing new. It's happened with every presidential administration.
“The Times reported that Bolton had given the draft of his book to some friends and to the White House as a part of a standard review process for former officials.
After The Times published its story on the manuscript, Bolton's lawyer released a statement saying he did not believe any part of the manuscript was classified and accusing the White House of leaking the information to The Times, saying "the prepublication review process has been corrupted."
https://www.businessinsider.com/bolton- … nyt-2020-1
Five Times Obama Put Conditions on Foreign Aid and Democrats Didn’t Care
https://pjmedia.com/trending/five-times … idnt-care/
Wrong again, Mike. It wasn't US policy to hold up the funding, no matter how many times you claim it was. Giving his personal attorney permission to get involved in Ukraine's affairs was not policy. To claim to be so smart, you ought to be able to figure this out.
I think that Bolton's testimony could be a smoking gun for those who are willing to listen. I am not optimistic that GOP senators fall into that category.
by Kevin W 2 years ago
Is it disrespectful for the Championship Team not to make the White House visit?The NBA Champion Golden State Warriors unanimously voted as a team not to make a White House visit to the President after beating the Cleveland Cavaliers, as did Tom Brady and many of the Superbowl Champion Patriots. Do...
by G. Diane Nelson Trotter 2 years ago
What steps should be taken to reorganize?Jared Kushner? John Kelly? Sessions? Ivanka?Should Melania file for divorce?Should Trump pray more?Is Mike Pence the sane one
by Natalie Frank 3 years ago
In the last day I have come across a few differences when I send a hub for review. First there is a page that comes up that requires me to check a box attesting to my confirmation that I will only publish high quality hubs (Not sure of the usefulness of this - I'm sure no one thinks...
by Philip Cooper 5 years ago
Who believes the Republicans will win the White House in two years time?
by Kevin Languedoc 8 years ago
Should Hubpages start providing a Peer Review ProcessWith new search algorithms from Google and Bing and Yahoo relying more on the social relevancy of content and the social trustworthiness of content as well as higher quality content, should HubPages as a service to Hubbers and the Community,...
by Stacie L 2 years ago
The Latest Test for the White House? Pulling Off Its Easter Egg Rollhttps://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/11/us/p … .html?_r=0“It’s the single most high-profile event that takes place at the White House each year, and the White House and the first lady are judged on how well they put it on,” said...
Copyright © 2020 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|