Joe's Tale Of Three Pipelines

Jump to Last Post 1-2 of 2 discussions (15 posts)
  1. Sharlee01 profile image85
    Sharlee01posted 3 years ago

    https://hubstatic.com/15579739.jpg
    Joe Do YOu Know What You Are Signing? Do You?

    January 20, Biden’s very first day as president, he shut down the Keystone XL pipeline. He gave11,000  citizens that had high-paying jobs the boot, yeah pink slips. Most of these jobs were good-paying union jobs. While these unemployed American workers went on unemployment,  Russian President Vladimir Putin most likely had a big wonderful party, toasting Lod Joe with a shot of Vodka.

    Today Canadian oil is trapped underground. And yes Canada's r Prime Minister Trudeau was very displeased with the USA going back on their agreement.

    Keystone’s cancellation curbed long-term supplies of crude oil. and quickly boosted global prices for Russia’s key export.    Indeed, for this and other reasons, crude has crept from $53-per-barrel at Biden’s inauguration to over  $66  — up 25%

    Let's move on to the second tale the Colonial Pipeline. Which was shut down on May 7 after a Russian ransomware hacker attack.   Carteresque gasoline lines soon stretched from Georgia to Washington, D.C.  What did Ol' Joe do? He hid in the White House and was silent until May 10. He then submerged and offered up a  tepid blurb that exonerated the Kremlin, yes the Kremlin.  I ask,  where was Biden’s outrage? Why did he not publicly demands that Putin answer for this hack? Yes, be tough on Putin, as he said he would when he campaigned.

    No, what he did was reward the Kremlin for its acquiescence in the Colonial caper by ---- you may have guessed  --- scrapping sanctions against you got it, the third pipeline tale, the  Nord Stream 2 natural gas pipeline that runs between Russia and Germany.    Biden was asked by the press why he decided to take such a step.

    Biden Stated --- "Because it’s almost completely finished, number one. "  Then continues on with these confusing words. 

    "The idea that anything that — and it’s not like I can allow Germany to do something they’re not."  This sentence makes no sense whatsoever... No really, it puts me in mind of his "you know the thing" statement.

    I must also point out Biden’s betrayal also fails on environmental grounds. Germany will not import American liquefied natural gas, as President Trump pressed Chancellor Angela Merkel to do.  Nor will Germany swap gas for wind farms, solar panels, or geothermal plants. Instead, Germany will burn Russian natural gas. While that fuel is one-third cleaner than oil and twice as clean as coal, Germany and some neighboring nations still will turn gas into energy and yes BINGO, carbon dioxide. So Joe, what about your concern about the environment?  Does this all seem half-ass backward?

    Page 308 of Keystone’s environmental impact statement says that its oil would have generated up to 178 million metric tons of CO2 annually.  What did Joe state?  "Killing Keystone was a beautiful thing."

    Nord Stream 2 would carry up to 55 billion cubic meters of natural gas from Ust-Luga, Russia to Greifswald, Germany. That gas, according to Gen Less’s online calculator, would generate 132 million metric tons of CO2. So, by speeding up Nord Stream 2, Biden will have combusted 74 percent of the anti-global-warming "benefit" that he created by junking Keystone.

    Environmentalists should be enraged, should they not?

    Nord Stream 2  is estimated to add $3.3 billion to Russia’s annual GDP. Though a tidy sum, the Kremlin’s jackpot is really more geopolitical.

    Nord Stream 2 would enable the Putin regime to further weaponize Russia’s energy resources to exert political pressure throughout Europe," four bipartisan U.S. House members warned Secretary of State Antony Blinken in a February 17 letter.

    IMO Russia’s obvious intention has been to form an alliance with Germany and Austria (also with the Netherlands and Belgium) against Eastern and Northern Europe. NS2 is Russia’s most daring attempt to break up the EU.

    Finally --  Biden announced that he will meet on June 16, 2021with Putin in Geneva, following G-7 and NATO conclaves.   So it is evident that Putin will pay not even pay a diplomatic price after citizens corked U.S. fuel supplies in exchange for a $4.4 million Bitcoin ransom.

    This president Biden has clearly squandered Trump’s hard-won America's energy independence, added 11,000 American pipeline workers to America's unemployment lines, and screwed up Trump’s diplomacy, which had Germany now depending on Russia for natural gas. Now, Germany will become addicted — not to U.S. liquefied natural gas, but gas from the very adversary that NATO was designed to defeat.

    Any thoughts?  This kind of crazy is just hard to comprehend...

    .

    1. Sharlee01 profile image85
      Sharlee01posted 3 years agoin reply to this

      https://hubstatic.com/15580897.jpg
      Better keep on eye on Old Joe --- Because while we sleep, Joe is baken the bread!  Or should I say somebody is...

      The true cost to taxpayers to belong to the Good Old Boys Club The Pairs Climate Accord --- Actually I can't find a number on how much Joe has promised.

      . At the end of 2020, however, the Green Climate Fund had only raised $7 billion, ... But now the cash cow has come back into the herd.   https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2021/ … agreement/

      How much do we pay for the Paris climate accord?
      This removed the requirement for the United States Congress to ratify the agreement. In April 2016, the United States became a signatory to the Paris Agreement and accepted it by executive order in September 2016. President Obama committed the United States to contribute US$3 billion to the Green Climate Fund.

      "Pete Betts, an associate fellow at London-based think tank Chatham House who led climate negotiations for the European Union when the Paris deal was struck, said the United States will need to match its promises with financial commitments too.

      The United States under Obama pledged to deliver $3 billion to the Green Climate Fund to help vulnerable countries fight climate change. It has delivered only $1 billion so far.

      “The U.S. will need to put some money on the table, and also encourage others to do the same,” he said.

      Biden has tapped former Secretary of State John Kerry as his international climate envoy and is expected to set up a meeting in the coming weeks with global counterparts."

      https://www.reuters.com/business/energy … 021-01-20/

      1. wilderness profile image94
        wildernessposted 3 years agoin reply to this

        I like the "cash cow" mention, for that is exactly how the rest of the world sees the US.  While the EU sits back and watches, the US is required to foot the bills - a great reason to leave the Paris Accords behind us.  We don't need to foot the bill for the rest of the world.

        1. Sharlee01 profile image85
          Sharlee01posted 3 years agoin reply to this

          The Government has had a long history of trying an attempt to solve problems with cash or committees that start out with a bang, and then they just Poof disappear. Joe has initiated 90-day communities --- I lost count (Must laugh).  And none of these committees will ever be heard of again.

          I appreciated  President Trump's minding our pennies, in regards to foolish spending, and pulling out of all the fluff clubs like  The Pair Climate Accord, and WHO, and the Iran deal... Oh my, I am sure I forgot one or two. Trump was a pure common-sense problem solver and solved most problems to some extent one way or the other.

          I thank you for commenting, my post just does not attract comments.  I mean factual thorns in the side are never comfortable.  However, I post them to keep a track of what I feel in the end will ultimately be the downfall of a disastrous administration. I will admit the flubs of the administration are hard to keep up with.  And who would have thought we would witness almost daily problems that the Government just ignores.

          I mean when Trump was President we were bombarded most of the time with what he said, not his deeds.  No props for his accomplishment, just he said this or did you see Melania brush away his hand, not to mention Russia Russia crazy.

    2. Sharlee01 profile image85
      Sharlee01posted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Colonial Pipeline has confirmed it paid a $4.4m (£3.1m) ransom to the cyber-criminal gang responsible.
      https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canad … sponsible.

      Guess we can expect many hacks when companies pay a ransom.

      1. wilderness profile image94
        wildernessposted 3 years agoin reply to this

        Yep.  While I sympathize with companies desperate to get back into business, we ALL need to understand that blackmail simply must not be paid.  Once you pay the Danegeld...

        1. Sharlee01 profile image85
          Sharlee01posted 3 years agoin reply to this

          I was checking The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll, and I think they were hacked... Here is what I found ---

          Daily Presidential Tracking Poll
          Sponsored by The ANTIFA by Jack Posobiec
          Wednesday, June 02, 2021

          Not sure you know Jack, but Google his name. This is really very funny.

          So, it does not look like the hacker changed the polls, but who knows.

          https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public … rack_june2

    3. CHRIS57 profile image60
      CHRIS57posted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Please, for Americans talking about others CO2 emissions is like throwing stones in the glasshouse. Especially if you add the heavy CO2 rucksack to the fracking associated fossile fuel production in the USA. 

      As you mentioned the Northstream 2 project, the gas pipeline between Russia and Germany:

      Imho it was brutal Mob style pressing of protection money by the US, in the sense: you (Germany) buy our (US) gas so we can protect you from evil Russia. The thing is: not too many Germans and Europeans believe that Russia is a threat. On the contrary: Even in the darkest times of the cold war Russia/Soviet Union was a reliable supplier of natural resources.

      With the German and European demand for natural gas on the retreat, the real purpose of NS2 is to gain independance from supply lines through Ukraine and southern Europe. And Ukraine is deliberately destabilized by the US to create a roadblock between Europe and Russia/Asia/China (the big landmass).

      This is my opinion. The news  coverage in the US media on this topic (NS2) is full of disinformation, call it propaganda. And it doesn´t matter, left or right wing media. Different country, different perspective, different view on geopolitics.

      1. Sharlee01 profile image85
        Sharlee01posted 3 years agoin reply to this

        All good points. I will even agree with you in regard to Russia not being the big old threat that they have been made out to be for many decades.

        I was hoped to point out the sad fact that the current administration show hypocrisy closing the Keystione down, yet pretty much approving of the Russia NS2.  And you hit the nail on the head in regard to the USA media... My gosh, they pretty much make up our news at this point. We have talk jocks dishing up propaganda 24/7.

        America is failing, going downhill quickly, and what is most Bazar the majority are on board for the ride.

        1. CHRIS57 profile image60
          CHRIS57posted 3 years agoin reply to this

          It always puzzled me why some media were bashing the Trump administration for their policies towards Russia. Now the Biden administration is accused from the other corner for doing pretty much the same.

          Concerning energy and climate/CO2 related politics, the US is very much behind most of the world and certainly all of peer western countries. It is high time to counteract. Let me explain:

          The US uses almost twice as much energy to create its GDP in relative terms than western countries, the EU does. This competitive disadvantage (for the whole economy) was countered by low taxation of energy and by subsidizing the energy producers (with a minority of workforce associated).

          Now the climate change scenario becomes eminent. It is no more possible to neglect the impacts (How many "once in a century" storms and hurricanes do US insurance companies have to compensate for in a single year?) I address this from a pure economic standpoint, has nothing to do with green thinking. What i am saying is that neglecting the climate change will have a significant impact on competitivity. It will harm the country economically and the world with climate running amok.

          Having said this, any policy to reduce energy consumption, possibly by making energy more expensive or less easy to access will move the US into the right direction. It will harm tactically in the beginning but will be benefitial strategically.

          So, Biden is no better or worse than Trump when it comes to appeasement policies towards Russia, but Biden is definitely moving in the right direction concerning energy. This may not be loved by oil workers in Texas, but eventually they or their children will find out, that 20th century politics don´t help in the 21st century.  Just saying..

          1. Sharlee01 profile image85
            Sharlee01posted 3 years agoin reply to this

            Actually, it's odd Trump put sanctions on Russia in regard to the pipeline not to decrease pollution problems but -The Trump administration fears the pipeline will tighten Russia's grip over Europe's energy supply and reduce its own share of the lucrative European market for American liquefied natural gas. President Trump has said the pipeline, owned by Russia's Gazprom, could turn Germany into a "hostage of Russia".
            The US sanctions angered Russia and the European Union, which says it should be able to decide its own energy policies.  https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50875935

            Now Biden that claims he is very much against pollution has removed the Trump administration sanctions.   IMO Biden is showing hypocrisy on all counts. 

            I will admit I have not really kept up with the USA's progress on bringing down CO2 --- Came up with these numbers on a quick search,

            Are US CO2 emissions decreasing?
            According to the US Energy Information Administration, US CO2 emissions in 2019 were the lowest they have been since 1992. Per capita emissions were lower in 2019 than they've been at any time since at least 1950.   source   https://www.climatechangenews.com/2020/ … ent-trump/  I must admit very interesting subject.

            Well, Biden has made no friends of the oil companies and workers here, However, he certainly must have garnered some love from Russia and the EU.

            So do you feel the Russian pipeline will offer little problems to the environment?  More so than the Canadian Keystone pipeline?

            1. CHRIS57 profile image60
              CHRIS57posted 3 years agoin reply to this

              Let me pick up the pipeline topic first:
              It is by far the most cost effective way to transport fossile fuels and that is why they are built. There may be some minor impacts on ecology in the construction process, but nothing of any importance to CO2 or climate. So it all boils down to what and how much is transported - and that is a matter of consumer demand. A new pipeline will not necessarily increase consumer demand. It will only increase competition in the energy sector and/or helps to avoid unsafe transportation alternatives (the NS2 objective).

              Doesn´t matter: a new pipeline in Europe or in North America, same issues. It is not about overground, underground, through the forests. It is about what is in the pipelines.

              Bringing down CO2 is directly linked to energy production and consumption. With almost twice the consumption of Europe per GDP the CO2 output is also twice as high. And if you consider the energy sources then the US is behind even further (Just compare: USA electricity generation 64% relying of fossiles, Germany same number 47% in 2020). And only fossile fuels contribute to CO2. 

              North Stream 2 will not add any CO2 to the carbon footprint of Germany/central Europe. So why should anyone oppose it from an ecology standpoint?

              Mr. Trump had a different agenda, that did not contain environmental, climate issues. So he could only say: We, the US mob protect you from the other big boy on the block, and that is why you have to buy our gas. For Biden it is much easier: No additional CO2, no pollution, no saving of the climate necessary.

    4. Sharlee01 profile image85
      Sharlee01posted 2 years agoin reply to this

      Here is where we are today, what did Joe's decisions on pipelines result in.

      Keystone XL pipeline. ---   If completed, the Keystone XL would have added 510,000 barrels (81,000 m3) per day increasing the total capacity up to 1.1 million barrels (170,000 m3) per day. Today we tapped national reserves, and beg OPEC for oil. 
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keystone_ … 2C000%20m3)%20per%20day.

      Nord Stream 2 --   Russia close to using natural gas as a weapon in Europe's gas crunch - Biden energy adviser  https://www.reuters.com/business/energy … 021-10-25/


      Nord Stream 2  -   "LONDON — Russia has opted against sending more natural gas supplies to Europe, curbing hopes that Moscow may ease its grip on the market shortly after President Vladimir Putin said the country would be prepared to help.

      Highly anticipated auction results on Monday showed Russia’s state gas giant Gazprom had not booked additional gas transit capacity for November either through the Ukrainian pipeline system or lines into western Europe via Poland."

      https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/19/energy- … urope.html

      Colonial Pipeline --- "Ransomware attacks on Colonial Pipeline, JBS Foods, and other major organizations made headlines in 2021, and show no sign of slowing down. Across the world, hackers are exploiting security weaknesses and holding the data of companies, governments and healthcare organizations hostage, sometimes demanding tens of millions of dollars in payment."  https://illinois.touro.edu/news/the-10- … f-2021.php

  2. Ken Burgess profile image70
    Ken Burgessposted 3 years ago

    I enjoyed the first few paragraphs as they were factual and did not wander into opinion (not that its bad to have an opinion) I would add to that list which impacts the price of oil the fact that on day 1 he halted all drilling on Federal Land, which impacted Texas especially, putting tens of thousands out of work.

    Yes, Biden is a great ally to Big Oil, Higher Gas Prices, and Russia... his actions speak in direct opposition to his words.

    1. Sharlee01 profile image85
      Sharlee01posted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Ya got me... LOL  --- yes my opinion seeped in, as it always does. Thanks for taking the time to comment. Always respect your view.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)