Government isn't working so great these days. The parties are pretty divided. Let's see if there is some common ground.
I'll open by guessing that we can all agree we'd like to see elected representatives operate with a balanced budget, so we can start tackling the national debt.
What are some other common areas?
Yes, Valeant, government is terribly divided. But, idea of a balanced budget has gone the way of the nickel Pepsi. Both sides are profligate spenders, just in different directions. Whose ox are we going to gore with the goal of reaching Nirvana, a balanced budget?
I think we should start with the waste, fraud and abuse built into every federal budget as areas both sides can agree upon that need to be curbed. If we can't agree on the meat and bone to be cut, perhaps we can agree on what is fat and gristle?
I have little if any interests that I can find in common with Republicans as they are presently.....
... yeah, they are out of touch, old codgers just moseying along being recklessly extravagant and wasteful in the use of resources.
- didn't we vote them out yet?
- term limits, anyone?
I think we can definitely agree that term limits on both sides is a good thing.
I agree with you.
Can we agree the main problem is this is it would require those who would lose their position to vote it into law? Washington DC is too political for such a thing to ever happen.
I agree with you very strongly, I just don't see a way for it to happen.
There are none that all Americans can agree on.
America is truly a divided country, a tribal society, with no common core.
The common core has been stripped away over the course of many decades... and today, there is none. Things like the Pledge of Allegiance, having to learn English, having to conform to "Christian" norms, all gone.
Ahead lies more efforts to separate Americans based on Race and Gender, what today may seem like extreme or unacceptable efforts of Social Justice and Gender Equality will pale in comparison to what tomorrow brings to help deepen the divides among Americans.
I believe by the end of the decade, there will be some form of global entity that has usurped America's sovereignty and relegated the Constitution and people's freedoms and liberties to an afterthought... a footnote of history of a time as antiquated to the people growing up in the 2030s and beyond as the Holy Roman Empire is to us.
And yet, just above, Mike and I can find agreement on term limits and balanced budgets. Two people, about as far apart on the political spectrum, can actually agree on some things.
And just how far are you going to go to encourage your government into doing those things you agree on?
Because there will never be a voluntary effort by the politicians whose lives revolve around DC to do either.
And the issues that divide you and Mike will continue to divide you... keeping you from coming together to force change in your government.
Should you continue to pursue change, you will just be labeled, isolated, stripped of your ability to communicate on Social Media or in the MSM.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/07/20/politics … index.html
Central Control is coming. We will have a lot more in common with CCP China than anyone would have believed possible a few years back just a couple years from now.
Well, I won't be attacking my own Capitol, that's for sure.
And you don't think someone who runs on being able to balance a budget would appeal to people of both parties?
There's part of the reason Biden was able to be elected. His old, whiteness appealed to enough conservatives to make him comfortable enough to vote for.
Sometimes, a single issue can be the determining factor to electability. Trump immigration issue could be seen an an example to his rise in 2016.
You're right about those single issues, but there is a very large problem when it comes to term limits.
When people are asked to remove their pipeline to federal funds (old time politicians playing pork barrel), when they are asked to remove a very powerful politician of their chosen party, when they are asked to remove a politician that they are familiar with and have voted for the last 20 years...well, there is a wee problem. It will always come down to "term limits for your representative, but I want mine to remain.
Seems to work fairly well for Presidents, so I'll disagree that people will be as selfish as you believe them to be.
But at the same time nearly everyone in the country is presented (and I agree with that) as needing term limits. Even as they continue to vote their own long term professional politicians back into office.
You can't have it both ways; either they actually WANT term limits, whereupon they won't vote their own favorites back into office, or they don't.
Sure you can. I can want a law for term limits, but choose to vote the most beneficial option until that happens. Those two things can exist at the same time.
And we're back to you just arguing to argue I see.
OK. But I will absolutely stand by the concept that those truly wanting term limits will not vote for long term politicians. Only that that want everyone else to get rid of theirs, while keeping their own, will do that.
How far does your government go before you do?
Or is that a blanket statement, covering all instances?
Like when the Germans accepted the Nazi Party and the "work camps" and the Warsaw Ghetto.
Or how the Chinese accept anything their Party does, from locking up hundreds of thousands of Muslims without trial in its western region of Xinjiang, to enforcing unwanted rulership over Hong Kong, to threatening war on Taiwan.
Yes, I understand your position, always support your government, it is never wrong, always believe what the government supported "news" tells you to believe.
Now, you're just changing context. Here is the question my sarcastic response was an answer to:
And just how far are you going to go to encourage your government into doing those things you agree on?
And you're now choosing to apply one answer to a fairly different scenario and make a false statement that you understand 'my position.' Do us all a favor and find a sense of humor.
I understand some have serious trust issues - one's own government, the media, elections. I'm sorry I'm going to choose not to live in a full-on paranoid state like that.
As I said, despite your effort to deflect, or state a change of context...
You choose to believe what your government and government supported "news" puts out.
Whether a virus, where some information is inflated while other information is suppressed, or politicians, where we are told by one side that their antagonistic opposition is a rapist, Russian conspirator, card carrying KKK member, or occurrence, where a riot that includes buildings burned and people killed is merely a peaceful protest.
There really is nothing that can be agreed upon, no matter what Mike or Dan may say they agree with you on.
Because quite simply, you don't come close to having their perspectives on what the reality is. We come from different times, listen to different news sources, have seen different things in the world.
I think you are someone who will accept whatever "facts" your government, or more specifically, whatever your "side" in the political dichotomy tells you 'the truth' is.
I don't blame you for that... there is nothing heroic or honorable about standing up expressing an alternate opinion to that, when it likely will cost you your job, your friends, your acceptance in the community you live in.
Better to just swallow that blue pill and live in that safe world, life is too short, and we are living in such good times with so much freedom and liberty to do what we want.
We live in a great country, and for the most part a great world, never been better, never been more civil or safe. Just be thankful of it and enjoy.
And yet, I've been critical of my 'side' on certain issues, such as immigration. So, your incorrect theory that I will 'accept' whatever narrative they want to sell me seems to be undermined by my actions here at this site.
I don't blame you for ignoring those actions, as you seem to think you're the only critical thinker on the planet, despite buying in to the big lie that a proven liar has sold you about the 2020 election - the exact same lie he tried to sell in 2016, formed a commission to investigate, and was then proven to be a lie. To fall for the same lie twice kind of undermines your expertise in being able to determine when other people's 'facts' may or may not be accurate.
So while you claim that 'I am someone who will accept whatever "facts" your government, or more specifically, whatever your "side" in the political dichotomy tells you 'the truth' is,' you seem to be doing that exact same thing, just more from a side willing to undermine democracy and the peaceful transfer of power and turn to violence.
And by the way, it has been proven by both 'sides' that the 2016 Trump campaign conspired with Russia. And I didn't need to listen to government or government supported sources to come to the conclusion that Trump is a rapist, I just had to listen to his own admission about it. Again, something it appears you're more than willing to block out because it's a hard truth.
Elect representatives with LIFE experience, not politicians. Elect intelligent, grassroots people with a combination of commonsense and education. Establish a strict meritocracy. Housewives would be great representatives, especially lower middle class housewives. These are the people who are QUITE ADEPT at balancing budgets.
What is the "meat and bone" and what is the "fat and gristle?"
.... when were Pepsis only a nickel?
I wanted to show you an example or two of what I mean by fat and gristle.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamandrze … c907073dc0
You don't remember when you were a kid when you could get a soft drink or candy bar for a nickel? Officially, the last nickel coke was in 1959 and I remember.
Meat and bone would constitute the areas of federal spending that do have purpose, but some aspects are promoted or opposed by many based on partisan or ideological ideals.
I worked in Federal Contracting for over 25 years and the culture is not about saving more than it is spending the entire allotment or appropriation for your agency before the end of fiscal year or risk not being given the same amount for the next year. That means buying everything and anything to fill the void. It can be considered an attitude and culture that encourages waste. There was a lot of "glad handing", no bid contract and outrageous overhead and indirect cost rates explain the $600.00 hammers and all the other horror stories that I am sure that you have heard about.
My only memory from 1959 is falling asleep after the first few minutes of the movie, Bambii.
I do not doubt what you report.
Can we agree that if there was a law passed that if we don't have a balance budget, Congress is held responsible for it, and does not get paid until it is budget is balanced, would change things.
I agree...may never happen, but I believe this would change things when it comes to the budget.
by Josak 10 years ago
Some thoughts:No campaign contributions allowed all campaigns are funded by a tiny flat tax every party receives a given amount to publicize their views so long as they can get say 50 000 party members. Yearly full IRS audit for all major elected officials.A limit on legal fees for any court case...
by Mike Russo 15 months ago
by logic,commonsense 13 years ago
Why does this president not trust the American voter to vote appropriately on a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution?Apparently he knows what's best for us better than we do.If the majority of voters do not want it, it will not pass. If they do, then why shouldn't we have one?Every...
by Ralph Schwartz 7 years ago
Do you think Trump will push for Term Limits to shake up Congress?There are many members of Congress who have lived most of their adult lives as elected members of Congress - clearly in defiance to what the founders intended a representative government to be. Are you in support of limiting...
by Susan Reid 13 years ago
Best comment I've seen to date says (paraphrased):"I think the Congress should do this every day. They've got nothing better to do. And the economy's humming along and everything's swell here on the shining city on the hill."You'd certainly think a vote that has been routine for several...
by Ralph Schwartz 8 years ago
Donald Trump just announced he will pass Term Limits? Will this help him win?At a rally today Trump spoke about a Constitutional Amendment on Term Limits for Congress. This should be supported across the asile - thoughts?
Copyright © 2025 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2025 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |