Once Again Biden Uses The DOJ AS A Political Cudgel

Jump to Last Post 1-1 of 1 discussions (7 posts)
  1. Sharlee01 profile image84
    Sharlee01posted 15 months ago

    https://hubstatic.com/15757522.jpg
    Biden once again uses the DOJ  to interject on the right of a state to have sovereignty. Abortion is a hot political topic, and this interference of the DOJ shows clear partisan behavior.

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit late Thursday rejected the Justice Department's request to lift a stay on an order from a federal judge in Texas that had temporarily blocked the law. This ruling prompted The Biden administration to ask the DOJ  to ask the Supreme Court to block the Texas new abortion laws.

    The Justice Department asked the high court Monday to lift an order imposed by a conservative federal appeals court that has allowed Texas to continue enforcing the nation's strictest curbs on abortion through a novel law that was written to make it hard to challenge in the federal court system. The department had announced its intentions last Friday."
    https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/jus … w-80538924

    The Biden Administration continues to politicize the DOJ, ignore the rule of law, and undermine state sovereignty.  More overreach from this White House...Biden violating his campaign pledge, not to politicize the DOJ to do his bidding, as he accused the prior president of doing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxJXfn2RiYs

    -- What is your feeling about the overreach that the current White House has used, now on several occasions to promote the DOJ to intervene in State sovereignty?

    -- Is the Biden administration using the DOJ as a political cudgel?

    ( I hope this thread will not be seen as a thread to evoke opinions on abortion.  We all have strong opinions on that subject.   This thread is meant to deal with government overreach, and an administration that is clearly using the DOJ as a political tool in my view.)    Hopefully, you will share your opinion.

    1. wilderness profile image96
      wildernessposted 15 months agoin reply to this

      I can see it as a political tool only if it is the abortion issue that is considered.

      But the Texas law was constructed and carefully written to violate federal law, as decided by the Supreme Court, and get away with it.  As such, the DOJ and a call to the SCOTUS  is certainly a valid method of enforcing federal law.

      1. Sharlee01 profile image84
        Sharlee01posted 15 months agoin reply to this

        It will be interesting to see what the Supreme Court will rule in the latest appeal. Just last month, in a 5-4 vote, it refused to block the law. But the court's decision at the time left open the option for abortion providers to challenge the Texas law in other ways in the future.
        https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/01/us/s … rtion.html

        IT does appear the law was written the Supreme Court could get involved.  Texas only changed the law with a stipulation of a time limit to when it was legal for a woman to obtain an abortion. It is in opposition to Roe versus Wade.

        Roe verse Wade Supreme Court rule involves by 12-week trimesters.

        During a pregnant woman's first trimester, the Court held, a state cannot regulate abortion beyond requiring that the procedure be performed by a licensed doctor in medically safe conditions.

        During the second trimester, the Court held, a state may regulate abortion if the regulations are reasonably related to the health of the pregnant woman.

        During the third trimester of pregnancy, the state's interest in protecting the potential human life outweighs the woman's right to privacy. As a result, the state may prohibit abortions unless an abortion is necessary to save the life or health of the mother.

        So, the new Texas law bucks their ruling.

        So, once again Texas will fight to keep the right to make their own laws on abortion.  Back to 1973s  Texas versus federal Government.

        So, should individual States have the right to write their own laws on abortion?  One must consider "we the people" vote in our State  Governments.  Should the "people" of a given state have the right to dictate their values on abortion in a given state or should Fed Gov make abortion laws?   Again back to my subject -- Federal Government overreach.

        1. wilderness profile image96
          wildernessposted 15 months agoin reply to this

          If the feds overreached, it did so in 1973 when it protected the rights of the minority.  Do states have the right to override that decision, and take those rights away?

          I would submit that the framers of the Constitution took great pains to protect ALL the people, while states, to a much larger degree, do not.  Instead it is "rule of majority", with the majority simply running roughshod over the wants of minorities.

          But whether that is true or not, the fact remains that Texas is attempting to violate federal law by taking rights away from the minority, and that that should not be permitted.  Were it a matter of banning Big Gulps at 7-11, it wouldn't matter so much, but it goes so far beyond that that it is imperative that the feds step in and enforce federal law.  IMO.  I put this in the same category as states banning gun ownership; our constitution allows that and states may not infringe on that right.

          1. Sharlee01 profile image84
            Sharlee01posted 15 months agoin reply to this

            really good point. It would appear Texas is pushing to change its abortion law while g to perhaps hoping to set precedence for other states to follow.  It will be interesting to see where this ends up.

            1. wilderness profile image96
              wildernessposted 15 months agoin reply to this

              Indeed it will.  Personally I will be extremely disappointed if our new "conservative" SCOTUS decides that the one in 1973 was incorrect, and that the government cannot, after all, decide what is legal and what is not where abortion is concerned.  Because that would indicate, to me at least, that Trump's appointees are no better than what was in there; that they will legislate from the bench rather than interpret law.  I have much higher hopes for them.

    2. Sharlee01 profile image84
      Sharlee01posted 15 months agoin reply to this

      Congress is questioning AG Garland. on many subjects. Most questions that have been asked of Garland have been in regard to how the AG and FBI became involved with a letter sent to Biden by the National School Board Associaton. The letter requesting Biden's help with what they called threats and violence from parents at the Board meeting.

      Turns out the White House was in discussion with the National School Board Association in the weeks leading up to the NSBA  sending a letter that demanded federal law enforcement crackdown on the alleged harassment of school officials. An email showing the school board group drew on conversations with White House staffers in drafting the letter.
      Source to view email mentioned ---   https://defendinged.org/press-releases/ … e-release/

      Once again  Biden appears to be using the DOJ  to do his bidding. Using the AG as a strong arm to scare and threaten parents from becoming involved in their children's education.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)