"URGENT ACTION APPEAL
- From Amnesty International USA
To read the current Urgent Action newsletter, go to
For a print-friendly version of this Urgent Action (PDF):
http://www.amnestyusa.org/actioncenter/ … a07608.pdf
18 March 2008
UA 76/08 Fear of torture and other ill-treatment
Samten (m), aged 17, Lungkar Monastery, Qinghai Province
Trulku Tenpa Rigsang, (m), aged 26, Lungkar Monastery, Qinghai Province
Gelek Pel (m) aged 32 Lungkar Monastery, Qinghai Province
Lobsang (m) aged 15, Onpo Monastery, Sichuan Province
Lobsang Thukjey (m), aged 19 Onpo Monastery, Sichuan Province
Tsultrim Palden (m), aged 20 Onpo Monastery, Sichuan Province
Lobsher (m), aged 20 Onpo Monastery, Sichuan Province
Phurden, (m), aged 22 Onpo Monastery, Sichuan Province
Thupdon (m), aged 24 Onpo Monastery, Sichuan Province
Lobsang Ngodup (m), aged 29 Onpo Monastery, Sichuan Province
Lodoe (m), aged 30 Onpo Monastery, Sichuan Province
Thupwang (m), aged 30, Darthang Monastery
Pema Garwang (m), aged 30, Darthang Monastery
Tsegyam (m), aged 22, Kashi Monastery
Soepa (m), aged 30, Mangye Monastery
According to information published by the Tibetan Centre on
Human Rights and Democracy (TCHRD), 15 Tibetan monks were
detained on 10 March for staging a peaceful demonstration in
Barkhor, Lhasa, the capital of Tibetan Autonomous Region.
There is no information of their current whereabouts or of
any charges brought against them. They are at high risk of
torture and other ill-treatment.
On Monday 10 March hundreds of monks began a march from
Drepung Monastery towards Barkhor. Another group, which
included the 15 monks now in detention, began their march
from Sera Monastery, but were soon detained. The monks had
been demanding that the government ease a "patriotic re-
education" campaign which forces them to denounce the Dalai
Lama and subjects them to government propaganda.
Protests began in other monasteries in support of those
detained. Demonstrations also involving lay people then
followed across Lhasa, in other parts of Tibet and in areas
of the neighboring provinces of Qinghai, Gansu and Sichuan
with large populations of Tibetans. On Friday the protests
became violent, with some protesters specifically targeting
and setting fire to Chinese-owned businesses and attacking
people from other ethnic groups.
The Chinese authorities urged the protesters to give
themselves in by Monday 17 March at midnight, Beijing Time,
and promised that those who did would be treated leniently.
As of today, the streets of Lhasa were reported to be
largely quiet and empty.
Police and soldiers are reported to be conducting house to
house sweeps in Lhasa. Some eyewitnesses have reported
individuals being dragged from their homes. There continue
to be reports of unrest in neighboring Sichuan and Gansu
provinces. There are also reports that some Chinese police
and soldiers have used excessive force, including lethal
force, against Tibetan demonstrators in Lhasa and elsewhere.
With large numbers of troops now deployed in the region
further human rights violations may be committed.
The Chinese authorities have imposed a near-total block on
information leaving Tibet and surrounding areas. Permits for
journalists to enter Tibet were stopped from 12 March.
Foreign journalists have been barred or removed from
districts in Gansu, Sichuan and Qinghai provinces, where the
unrest has spread.
The Chinese government has the right and duty to defend all
individuals and property from violence. At the same time
international law requires that the authorities handle such
crises in ways that uphold fundamental human rights and the
principles of necessity and proportionality in the use of
force. For example, firearms should only be discharged as a
last resort and when lives are at risk.
TCHRD has obtained pictures of fourteen of the detained monks. The portraits are on their website at:
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Please send appeals to arrive as quickly as possible:
- urge the authorities to release the 15 monks named above, as well as all others detained for peacefully exercising their right to freedom of expression, association and assembly;
- urge the authorities to fully account for all those detained during the demonstrations, ensuring they are not tortured or otherwise ill-treated, have access to lawyers and medical care, are brought promptly before an independent
court and are able to challenge their detention;
- ensure that those prosecuted are charged with internationally recognizable offences and tried in proceedings which meet international fair trial standards;
- allow full and unimpeded access to Tibet and other Tibetan areas to journalists and other independent observers
- allow independent UN investigation into the events of the last week, including full access to scenes of confrontation, eye-witnesses, and detainees, and allow similar access to independent observers, including journalists and human rights NGOs.
President of the People’s Republic of China
HU Jintao Guojia Zhuxi
The State Council General Office
2 Fuyoujie, Xichengqu
People’s Republic of China
Salutation: Your Excellency
Chairman of the Tibet Autonomous Regional People’s Government
Qiangba PUNCOG Zhuren
Xizang Zizhiqu Renmin Zhengfu
Lasashi 850000, Xizang Zizhiqu
People’s Republic of China
Salutation: Dear Chairman
Minister of Public Security of the People’s Republic of China
MENG Jianzhu Buzhang
Dongchengqu, Beijingshi 100741
People’s Republic of China
Fax: 011 86 10 63099216 (it may be difficult to get
through, please keep trying)
Salutation: Your Excellency
Mayor of Lasa Municipal People’s Government Tibet Autonomous Region
LOBSANG Gyaincain Shizhang
Lasashi Zizhiqu Renmin Zhengfu
16 Jinjulu, Lasashi 850000, Xizang Zizhiqu
People’s Republic of China
Salutation: Dear Mayor
Ambassador Wen Zhong Zhou
Embassy of the People’s Republic of China
2300 Connecticut Avenue NW
Washington, D.C. 20008
Fax: 1 202 745 7473
PLEASE SEND APPEALS IMMEDIATELY.
Check with the AIUSA Urgent Action office if sending appeals after 29 April 2008."
Here is the address for a petition you can sign that will go to the Chinese government calling for not violence; I just received it recently
I don't think chinese government shall pay any attention to such appeals by individuals.Influential governments of powerful countries should make diplomatic efforts to convince or pressurize chinese government. This is incidence of human right violation similar to Iraq, Afganistan and some other countries. Unfortunate thing is that poor people of Tibet neither has many natural resources nor they are economically or politically sound.
I think premsingh is right, I don't think appeals will carry any weight with the Chinese.
Monks and violence, what a sad combination. It makes me mad that anyone would be so brutal with such a peaceful order. Perhaps the earthquake will get all the soldiers called back to where they came from and leave the poor monks alone.
I'm neither a monk nor a Buddhist, but I very much like the Dhali Llama. For Pete's sake, why can't one sect leave the other alone and in peace.
I agree with Premsingh and Shirley Anderson that the Chinese government is a huge monolith, and that it will be difficult to influence them. However, every voice counts, and I would suggest clicking on the links above to see how you can add yours.
You may find an article that appeared in the New York Times interesting:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/22/world … p;emc=eta1
Well done for raising the issue here. I've been watching the coverage of the unrest on Chinese CCTV4, where, of course, the slant is very different. The problem the 'free' world has in making representations to the Chinese government on Tibet's behalf is that our own credibility is at a pretty low ebb in regard to human rights and respect of sovereignty. Nevertheless, individuals can make a difference, even to China. Remember Tiananmen Square?
I'm sorry it's taken me this long to respond. Thank you so much for your comments. It's so true what you say, individuals can make a difference. Look at Gandhi or Martin Luther King.
Right now there's an objective to send 2 million signatures to the Chinese government. Even if there's a remote possibility that they will take positive action, it's worth the attempt.
PS: How's the baby in your family? I hope very happy.
Maybe I am missing something here, and I am sure I am, but I thought that being a Buddhist monk was about non attatchment, from things, and the world?
Tibet is a tiny, poor country being ruled over by a large country who are prepared to use whatever force and violence are necessary to keep the country under control. The larger world powers like Russia, don't care, and the USA can't say a damn thing after the Iraq fiasco. Essentially, Tibet is screwed and everyone knows it. China is a major power, and nobody has the inclination or the nous to really stand up to them. They could gas the whole of Tibet tomorrow and I doubt they would suffer any ill effect on a global scale. The yuan is supporting the US economy, and China makes for a huge part of the world's food production as well.
In spite of an atrocious human rights record, China was awarded the Olympics Games. Let's face it, the powerful majority of the world has spoken on the China issue, and they've resoundingly said that they don't care what China does to its own citizens, or to Tibetans.
But why are Buddhist monks getting involved in something so very obviously worldy, after all, this is about politics and borders, neither of which matter a whit on a spiritual plane. I understood a monk's role to be a spiritual one, focused on living in the present with what one has, rather than inciting protest. Those things seem very separate from discovering inner peace.
(I'm not supporting what China is doing in any sense, or saying that the Buddhist monks shouldn't protest, I just wonder why it is that these people hopelessly make trouble for themselves, and seem to take themselves away from their spiritual goals.)
I feel your heart is in the right place, and agree that the world has already weighed in. The reason, I think, Tibetan Buddhist monks have taken to protesting, is that through the years into the present, innumerable monks and nuns have been harassed, imprisoned, tortured and executed for expressing their views. Remember, it is a capital crime in Tibet to own a photo of the Dalai Lama.
Also, Tibetan monks tend to not be as removed from the world as one might think. Many of them are asked to go out into the world and engage in commerce to help support the monastery. It is the monks' and nuns' families and the monks themselves who help pay for the monasteries' subsistence, as well as sponsors. There is no actual institution that supports the monasteries. So while they are not of the world, they are in the world.
I think that even though it is a very daunting task, every individual can help by adding one's name to the lists of protesters.
I hope this helps.
Hope Alexander, I think you've raised a good point, and it's one I wondered about it when I first heard the news. I think that their protest arose because of the Chinese denouncing the Dahli Llama.
Still, it was a bit of a surprise. Perhaps not peaceful demonstration, but the ensueing violence.
Thanks for your reply Guru-C, I find this situation, and others like it incredibly disheartening, and to be honest, a clear sign that either A) Democracy doesn't work, or B) Humans are inherently evil. For no major country, or indeed, the citizens of China themselves, feel inclined to do anything about what is happening to the Tibetans. Sure, there are protests, I remember there being protests about this very issue 10 years ago. In that time absolutely nothing has changed, in fact, things only seem to be getting worse.
We might care a little, but we don't care enough to actually do anything to stop the multitude of known human rights travesties going on across the world. You would think that people would be outraged and put an immediate end to terrorism, torture, and repression, but we don't. Evidently there is some element of the human psyche that supports these things.
I don't think that writing to the Chinese will help. I think that ceasing to buy the products they are churning out at such a massive rate would work though, because it would cripple their economy. That's the sort of action that could be taken en masse at an individual level, or in the form of a trade embargo at a governmental level. But instead, we will all continue to buy the products that support these evil practices, and our governments will continue to broker trade deals.
We're all just too damn selfish to really care.
(Well maybe not ALL of us technically, but enough of us are that those that aren't are probably statistically irrelevant anyway.)
So much of what you say resonates about the need to do more to promote human rights. And you are right, boycotting their exports may be a step in the right direction. The only thing I fear there is that China is such an economic superpower, I don't have the mathematical mind to figure out the impact in either direction. I certainly try not to consume any products that were produced in inhumane conditions.
I don't really think democracy is the problem here :
The most immediate possibility is to boycott the 2008 summer Olympics in every way possible and to sign the petitions, make the phone calls to our representatives, send the letters to the Chinese government officials, attend the candle light vigils. If we would share the links above with everyone on our mailing lists, and urged our friends to do the same, our politicians would here the roar of people who care.
People here may find it heartening that there are politicians holding office who have spoken out against the actions of the government of China toward Tibet. I received a press release today that was issued by the office of Florida Congresswoman Ileana Ross-Lehtinen:
Ros-Lehtinen Condemns Beijing’s Policies in Tibet
Critical of removal from U.S. list of countries with major human rights concerns;
Warns of potential for Beijing’s repression of rights advocates during Olympics
(WASHINGTON) – U.S. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL), Ranking Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said today that China’s violent crackdown in Tibet is a clear indication that the State Department acted prematurely last week in removing China from the list of nations with major human rights issues. In a March 10th letter to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Ros-Lehtinen raised concerns about the continuing crackdown on the rights of Tibetan and Uighur minorities. She also cautioned that attempts by Chinese officials to silence advocates of democracy and human rights, as well as critics of the regime, during the August Olympic games in Beijing could lead to the arrest and mistreatment of American citizens. Statement of Ros-Lehtinen:
The failure of Beijing’s policies has led to the violence we now see on the streets of Lhasa, and the people of Tibet are paying a terrible price.
Clearly the State Department’s decision to remove China from the list of countries with which we have major concerns about human rights was hasty and ill-considered and should be reversed.
Americans are very concerned about human rights abuses throughout all of China, including the suppression of the Falun Gong and every form of political dissent. Beijing’s steadfast support for the murderous regimes in Sudan, Burma and North Korea further demonstrates its callous disregard for basic human rights.
Beijing is attempting to use the Olympic games to hide its repressive policies. Responsible nations must not buy into this façade. Protests by human rights activists and others during the games are likely to result in a crackdown similar to that we are witnessing in Tibet. The gleam is already off the Olympic gold which Beijing so desperately seeks.
My comment about people either being evil, or democracy not working was meant to imply that either the people of the nations of the world don't give a damn about tyranny going on elsewhere, and are therefore complicit in the evils that go on... or the system of democracy has failed these people, and their views are not being represented and acted upon.
Today I received a link to a video of two New York City cops beating up a Tibetan protester in front of the United Nations. The protester was merely holding up a Tibetan flag. It makes me feel ashamed that police brutality would occur in a city as sophisticated as New York.
If you'd like to view the video to see for yourself, it's at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7NUNwq2 … ture=email
While you're here, please, please click on the link in the first posting of this thread to add your signature to the petition to the Chinese Government to end the violence towards the Tibetan people. Thank you.
by Tammy Barnette5 years ago
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-574549 … ensorship/"Google reports it has seen an "alarming" incidence in government requests to censor Internet content in the past six months." "The Web...
by Joseph T7 years ago
There are no human rights in China and Vietnam. The government of Vietnam was a gang of robbers and murderers; they tortured and killed their opponent citizens daily; the same also happened to China which is Vietnam’s...
by Comrade Joe3 years ago
The State Council Information Office of the People's Republic of China has published a report titled "Human Rights Record of the United States in 2013".In this a host of human rights abuses are highlighted,...
by SparklingJewel6 years ago
...and they complain we don't meet our responsibilitieshttp://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011/08/ … ed-states/the Chinese government (or whoever makes such decisions)have their ancient traditions of keeping face and...
by karl4 years ago
Britain has lost a staggering 202 European human rights cases involving murderers, terrorists, paedophiles and rapists, it emerged yesterday.Judges in Strasbourg handed the criminals taxpayer-funded payouts of...
by Deforest4 years ago
According to my source of information, those children were the ones who were kidnapped by djihadists. Experts are stating that they didn't die from sarin attacks since the symptoms don't correspond. In one word, we...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.