Trump’s Goebbels right hand man(Miller) is quite intolerant

1. 82

   Credence2posted 6 weeks ago

   this guy, Stephen Miller, and Charlie Kirk are bigoted people, but yet conservatives expect me to take Trump and his ultimate goals and find them advantageous? For whom?
   
   Hitler had his adoring tag along, Joseph Goebbels and Trump has his, Stephen Miller. History repeats itself.
   
   So, who is “zooming” who here?
   
   https://www.salon.com/2025/06/11/stephe … tent-rage/
   
   rightwingers are notorious for not looking and listening, but there will be enough attention by others that will see and hear, regardless.

   replyreport
   1. 82

      Sharlee01posted 6 weeks agoin reply to this

      This article is riddled with speculative language, emotional appeals, and sweeping generalizations that lack sourceable facts or balanced reasoning. It opens by accusing Donald Trump and Stephen Miller of fueling violence in Los Angeles through an unverified anecdote involving ICE, citing a "right-wing" source but never directly linking or quoting it. The piece describes Miller “screaming” at ICE officials with inflammatory language, such as asking why they weren’t at Home Depot or 7-Eleven, without hard evidence like transcripts, audio, or corroboration from multiple credible sources. Instead, it relies on unnamed or secondary reporting. The suggestion that ICE agents are targeting people with student visas over speeding tickets is presented as fact, but it lacks legal citation or documentation to support this serious accusation. Furthermore, while the article references a Charles Davis report in Salon, it fails to include a direct quote or link, making it impossible to fact-check the claim that Trump’s promises conflict with his supposed deportation actions.
      
      The most egregious issue, however, is the repeated use of racially charged rhetoric without justification. The author claims Stephen Miller is motivated by fantasies of a "white America," a serious accusation made without directly quoting him advocating for race-based policies. The citation of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and leaked emails is vague and lacks context, there’s no reference to when these emails were published, what they actually said, or where the public can review them. Similarly, the reference to an exception made for white South African refugees lacks policy documentation or proof that race was the defining factor in such decisions. Instead, the article relies on emotional language like “delusional,” “petty rage,” and “white-ifying America,” turning what should be a policy critique into an ideological rant.
      
      Another example of questionable journalism appears in its interpretation of census data. The article asserts that white non-Hispanic Americans are only 58% of the population, implying that diversity negates any argument for stronger immigration enforcement. But demographics alone don't prove or disprove policy intent, nor do they automatically reveal racism. It is also irresponsible to claim the Trump administration’s deportation strategy amounts to "demographic engineering" without citing internal memos, official statements, or court filings that explicitly state this intent. Quoting political commentators like Adam Serwer and Judd Legum doesn’t equate to evidence, especially when these individuals have a known partisan slant and no access to classified information.
      
      Finally, the narrative that Trump "started the violence" by calling in the National Guard misrepresents events and ignores broader context. There’s no timeline, no link to the LAPD statement mentioned, and no reference to specific incidents that prove Trump personally incited violence. In fact, claiming peaceful protests turned violent solely due to National Guard involvement is an oversimplification. It's speculative at best and dishonest at worst. The article is built on the assumption that Trump and Miller operate with white nationalist motives and that their every action stems from a desire to enforce racial purity. This kind of absolutist thinking might appeal to a narrow political audience, but it ignores the legal complexities, immigration law, and the legitimate concerns of American citizens, of all backgrounds, regarding border enforcement and public safety. The piece fails as journalism and reads more like ideological propaganda.

      replyreport
      1. 82

         Credence2posted 6 weeks agoin reply to this

         Want more, I will provide further substantiation from other journalist
         Sources. This not the first time I had heard this.
         
         https://www.the-independent.com/news/wo … 67509.html
         
         So it appears as reported by a reliable source that Miller DID make the references to 7-11 and Home Depot. So, you can spin like the earth on its axis but what he said, he did say. This is one little from the Steve Miller Band that I can do without.
         
         https://www.forbes.com/sites/stuartande … -protests/
         
         The arrests of people at nail salons, restaurants, construction sites and Home Depot illustrate that targeting dangerous criminals is not the Trump administration’s immigration policy. The likely triggering action for the arrests and protests in Los Angeles remains Stephen Miller directing ICE officials to arrest as many people without criminal convictions as possible.
         
         Forbes is a reliable source of journalism.
         
         And there is still more…
         
         https://www.yahoo.com/news/stephen-mill … 23407.html
         
         Do I believe many respected journalist sources or do I believe heavily biased right wing media, the choice is easy for me, but probably not for you/
         
         https://civilrights.org/resource/letter … s%20should
         
         
         Many organizations were signatory to this letter, could they all be wrong, Sharlee?
         
         
         So, who wants to argue with NBC News, Sharlee, are they not a bit more credible than Breitbart?
         
         https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/aft … k-n1096071
         
         What does the Congressional Hispanic Caucus have to say?
         
         https://chc.house.gov/media-center/pres … r-call-for
         
         
         Is this enough for you, Sharlee? There are plenty of sources that point in the same direction, there is no weaseling out from the facts this time. This what all American USA Today says: Can it ALL really be just liberal bias or is the right trying to just deceive people again?
         
         https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol … 582150001/
         
         Stephen Miller is Jewish and even the National Council.Jewish Women find him odious, pretty strong advocacy
         
         
         https://www.ncjw.org/news/stephen-mille … countable/
         
         I won’t and can’t support any leadership that keeps close company with a man like Miller, absolutely not.

         replyreport
      2. 60

         Willowarborposted 6 weeks agoin reply to this

         WSJ had the same reporting. It's a very comprehensive peace not only about Miller but about the direction of ice under this Administration with real stories from real people...
         
         https://www.wsj.com/us-news/protests-lo … p-f5089877

         replyreport
   2. 71

      IslandBitesposted 6 weeks agoin reply to this

      They are racists, bigots. Disgusting, as most of the people that always excuse and defend them. Trump is surrounded by some of the worst people.

      replyreport
      1. 82

         Credence2posted 6 weeks agoin reply to this

         True, I don’t know why so many on the Right are fighting tooth and nail to convince moderates and progressives otherwise.

         replyreport