The Fall of Late-Night Liberalism: Why So Many Hosts Lost Their Shows

1. 84

   Sharlee01posted 6 days ago

   So, who’s got the last laugh?
   
   
   
   In what can only be described as a seismic shift in the late-night television landscape, the past few years have seen a wave of cancellations, exits, and restructurings across nearly every major network. While media executives and PR statements often cite evolving viewer habits and financial concerns, a striking pattern emerges beneath the surface: virtually every host who lost their late-night show was liberal, outspokenly critical of Donald Trump, and often leaned heavily into progressive messaging.
   
   Coincidence?
   
   A Timeline of Liberal Late-Night Casualties (2021–2024)
   
   Conan O'Brien – Conan (TBS)
   Ended: June 2021
   
   One of the few non-political hosts on this list, Conan’s show ended after over a decade. While he wasn’t deeply partisan, O'Brien still aligned with Hollywood's left-leaning tendencies.
   
   TBS cited shifting strategies, but it was no secret that Conan’s viewership had slipped in the digital age.
   
   Conan moved to HBO Max with a new format, leaving traditional late-night behind.
   
   Lilly Singh – A Little Late with Lilly Singh (NBC)
   Canceled: 2021
   
   Singh, a self-proclaimed feminist and LGBTQ+ advocate, brought identity politics to the forefront of her short-lived show.
   
   Ratings never gained traction. NBC scrapped the show after two seasons as it re-evaluated its late-night strategy.
   
   Samantha Bee – Full Frontal with Samantha Bee (TBS)
   Canceled: July 2022
   
   One of the most aggressive anti-Trump voices in the genre, Bee’s style was loud, biting, and unapologetically leftist.
   
   After Trump left office, her show lost urgency — and ratings.
   
   TBS cited a “new programming direction,” but Bee’s brand of activist comedy had already begun to alienate broader audiences.
   
   Desus & Mero – Desus & Mero (Showtime)
   Ended: 2022
   
   The Bronx-born duo was a cultural phenomenon but leaned progressive in tone.
   
   Though their cancellation was attributed to “creative differences,” the show had lost momentum, and its ratings didn’t justify a high Showtime budget.
   
   Trevor Noah – The Daily Show (Comedy Central)
   Departed: December 2022
   
   After inheriting the legacy of Jon Stewart, Noah turned The Daily Show into a softer, more global commentary platform, but he didn’t shy away from attacking conservatives.
   
   Ratings never matched Stewart’s era, and Noah exited amid growing industry pressure and a shift toward guest hosts.
   
   His departure left The Daily Show rudderless, still without a permanent host in 2024.
   
   James Corden – The Late Late Show (CBS)
   Departed: April 2023
   
   Though not overtly political, Corden carried a left-leaning cultural vibe and featured numerous Democrat-aligned guests.
   
   Reports revealed the show cost upwards of $60 million annually while drawing insufficient ad revenue. CBS was not seeing a return on investment.
   
   Corden’s exit came as CBS restructured its late-night format entirely.
   
   And The King--- Stephen Colbert – The Late Show (CBS)
   Canceled: 2025 (announced during pending Paramount-Skydance merger)
   
   Perhaps the most overtly anti-Trump host on television, Colbert rode a wave of Trump backlash to become the #1 late-night host during the Trump years.
   
   Ironically, it was under the Biden administration that CBS pulled the plug — citing budgetary constraints and broader industry pressures.
   
   Though CBS explicitly stated the cancellation had nothing to do with performance or content, many observers found it symbolic that Colbert's heavy political slant lost its edge once Trump left office.  Oh Well
   
   A Shared Pattern: Trump Was the Punchline --- Seems this did not work well for liberal hosts...
   
   These hosts shared more than their time slots; they shared a target. Donald Trump, throughout his presidency and even post-White House, dominated their monologues, jokes, and interviews. Night after night, the same themes repeated: mocking Trump's tweets, ridiculing his supporters, and warning of impending democracy collapse.
   
   But once Trump was no longer president, the emotional hook began to fade. Without the boogeyman of the Right, their content often turned stale. What was once perceived as resistance comedy began to resemble preaching to the choir, and viewers,  even liberal ones, started tuning out.
   
   The Biden era has proven to be ironically bad for liberal comedy. Many of the late-night shows that thrived during Donald Trump's presidency began to falter once he left office. Without the constant drama and controversy that Trump brought to the headlines, liberal hosts struggled to find material with the same urgency or emotional punch. Their content, once perceived as sharp resistance, began to feel repetitive and increasingly disconnected from the national mood. At the same time, viewer habits shifted rapidly. Younger audiences, typically more progressive, moved away from traditional TV and gravitated toward streaming platforms, YouTube, and TikTok. This migration left late-night shows with dwindling ratings and a shrinking cultural footprint. Adding to the problem was the growing sense of "monoculture fatigue." The late-night landscape had become politically one-sided, creating an echo chamber that began to alienate moderates and independents. Viewers grew tired of the same ideological tone night after night. The genre, once a staple of American pop culture, no longer felt fresh or essential. As network executives faced financial pressures and audience erosion, even they began to question whether partisan comedy was still worth the investment.
   
   Where Are the Conservative Hosts?
   The flip side is equally revealing: there hasn’t been a successful right-leaning late-night host on a major network in decades. Efforts to introduce conservative-friendly comedy have largely stayed online or within podcast spaces.
   
   This lack of balance may have made the liberal late-night genre feel predictable and ideologically rigid. And as ratings and advertising dollars shrank, even the networks began to question the value of keeping these hosts on air.
   
   Conclusion: The Cultural Tide Is Turning
   The collapse of late-night television under the Biden administration may not be a coordinated takedown, but it's certainly not a coincidence. What thrived as political resistance during the Trump years couldn't sustain itself when the White House changed hands.
   
   The result? One by one, the most prominent liberal voices in late-night were either removed, canceled, or faded out. Whether this signals a rebalancing in entertainment,  or simply the end of the late-night genre as we knew it,  remains to be seen.
   
   But one thing is clear: Trump may have been their favorite punchline, but without him, they couldn’t keep the joke going.
   
   Absolutely, this is a very striking phenomenon, isn’t it? It certainly gives us plenty to think about. So, what do you make of it? What do you think triggered this clear domino effect, leading to the downfall of liberal comedy as we’ve known it?
   
   Wonder what will surface to replace Colbert?

   replyreport
   1. 70

      Ken Burgessposted 5 days agoin reply to this

      Late Night is a tough spot as it is... throw in bias and politics and you are losing more than half the late night audience... which is more likely Blue Collar than White Collar... Conservative over Liberal...
      
      Main Stream Media will continue to fall... younger generations have Youtube and TikTok and could care less about what is being preached on NBC or CNN or whatever.

      replyreport
   2. 77

      tsmogposted 5 days agoin reply to this

      For me, it comes down to the old adage - follow the money.

      replyreport
      1. 84

         Sharlee01posted 5 days agoin reply to this

         Oh yes--- Agree

         replyreport
         1. 83

            Readmikenowposted 4 days agoin reply to this

            Shar,
            
            Isn't this telling of democrats?
            
            Boys playing in women's sports gets a shrug.
            Millions of illegals crossing our southern border and the sigh and look away.
            ICE agents brutally attacked and it's nothing to them.
            
            A no-talent, DNC stooge, late night hack, gets canceled because nobody watches him, he is losing a company $50 million a year...and the left gets so emotional.  They go berserk.
            
            This shows you what is important to democrats.  Not the country, but their warped ideology.

            replyreport
            1. 84

               Sharlee01posted 4 days agoin reply to this

               Mike, absolutely — I couldn’t agree more. The hypocrisy is stunning and undeniable.
               
               Another perfect example: when parents show up at school board meetings concerned about what their kids are being taught, about gender ideology, CRT, or inappropriate content,  they’re smeared as domestic terrorists. The DOJ actually got involved, weaponizing federal power against everyday moms and dads who simply want a say in their children's education.
               
               But when left-wing activists block highways, storm state capitols, or loot in the name of "justice," the same Democrats shrug it off as “mostly peaceful” or “expressing frustration.”
               
               It’s always the same pattern: ignore or excuse anything that fits their agenda, no matter how damaging, and blow up over anything that challenges their narrative, even if it's minor or economically justified, like cutting a failing TV show. Their priorities are laid bare. It’s not about safety, sanity, or sovereignty; it’s about control, optics, and appeasing their base.
               
               This isn’t leadership — it’s ideology run amok.  And it is beyond sad, it's revolting..

               replyreport
2. 83

   Readmikenowposted 5 days ago

   I don't think liberals understand the concept of money.
   
   When you believe all money comes from the government or wealthy people with an endless supply of cash you have a warped sense of financial reality.
   
   I doubt the liberal mind can comprehend these late night shows are products for consumers.  The more consumers watch them, the more ad revenue it generates, the more money it makes.  Producing those shows costs money.  A show must make money to continue being produced.  These broadcast companies are businesses and businesses are in the business of making money.
   
   If the ratings don't justify it, the show can no longer be produced.
   
   It's just that simple.
   
   The liberal mind doesn't seem to comprehend these shows have to attract viewers.  This means they have to be a show people watch.  It has to produce content people find entertaining.
   
   The Gutfeld Show is gets the highest ratings in its time period.  It is a very conservative show.  It constantly makes fun of liberals and everyone else.  I think it's pretty funny.
   
   "Earlier in the night, Fox News’ Gutfeld! continued to rule its time period, leading all of the shows we track among both total viewers (with a 3.29 million average) and viewers aged 18–49 (at an average of 238,000), down -9% and -22%, respectively, vs. last quarter.
   
   Comparing this year’s Q2 numbers to the same period a year ago, Gutfeld! was the only show to grow its audience across both key metrics, with a net gain of +31.5% among total viewers, and +24% among viewers in the demo. (The Daily Show was up in the demo vs Q2 2024 by 2.7%, but down among total viewers by 1.2%.)
   
   Excluding Gutfeld!, aggregate linear late-night viewership was down -9% year-over-year among total viewers, and -21% in the demo. The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon sustained the greatest losses compared to Q2 2024, down -16% among total viewers and down -29% among viewers aged 18-49."
   
   https://latenighter.com/news/ratings/la … s-q2-2025/
   
   It's time liberals learn how they are not funny.  They don't know what is funny.
   
   If they did, liberals would realize what jokes they really are....just ask Gutfeld.

   replyreport
   1. 84

      Sharlee01posted 5 days agoin reply to this

      I agree with your take, and you laid it out perfectly. So many on the left seem to treat media like it's just supposed to exist for messaging, not realizing it's a business first and foremost. If a show doesn't make money, it doesn't stay on the air. Period.
      
      A great example is what happened with The Problem with Jon Stewart on Apple TV+. Despite all the media hype and Stewart's return to the spotlight, the show struggled to maintain viewership, and it didn’t justify the production costs. Eventually, Apple parted ways with him, reportedly over “creative differences”, but the bottom line is simple: not enough viewers, not enough money, so it wasn’t worth continuing. That’s how it works.
      
      Meanwhile, Gutfeld! is thriving because it actually delivers what an audience wants, humor with a punch, even if it leans hard on conservative takes. It's proof that success in media comes from understanding your market, not preaching to it.

      replyreport
   2. 70

      Ken Burgessposted 4 days agoin reply to this

      Wow... only 3.29 million... and that is the best...
      
      Just a year ago that was over 4 million I believe...
      
      As I said... Main Stream Media is dead... a waste of money for advertisers.
      
      Tucker gets upwards of a 100 million views on his Youtube/X productions.
      
      There are tons of Youtube regular streamers that get millions of views per whatever they put out.
      
      Essentially they were paying these talking-heads millions of dollars to preach their BS to no-one... no one was listening or watching late night talk show hosts or the loons like Rachel Maddow...
      
      If I weren't part of the 55+ club in age, and hanging out on these forums, I would probably be like most Americans and not even know who they were or what they were saying.

      replyreport