"Declassified Docs Target Obama-Era Spying"
I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again, lies and the people who tell them are the true legacy of Barack Obama’s presidency. One of the biggest and most dangerous lies ever pushed on the American people was the Trump-Russia collusion hoax. It was all based on a fake dossier paid for by Hillary Clinton and weaponized by Obama’s own national security team. This wasn’t some small political maneuver, this was a full-blown, coordinated attempt to destroy a duly elected president.
What makes it worse is that Obama’s CIA director, John Brennan, used that same bogus dossier to build what they called an "Intelligence Community Assessment" or ICA. This assessment claimed, with "high confidence," that Putin and the Russian government preferred Trump and tried to help him win. That’s not just misleading, it’s outright dishonest. As Tulsi Gabbard put it during her press conference, "They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help President Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true. It wasn’t."
The scheme was cleverly circular. The dossier was used to justify the ICA, and then the ICA was used to give legitimacy to the dossier. They fed off each other like a snake eating its tail, and the anti-Trump media bought into it immediately. Once it leaked, the story spread like wildfire. And guess who made sure of that? Obama, Brennan, Comey, all the usual suspects.
Newly declassified documents now show that the original December 8, 2016 version of the Presidential Daily Briefing actually debunked the idea that Russia meddled to help Trump. But since that didn’t fit their narrative, Comey and others reportedly buried it. The next day, Obama held a secret meeting and ordered a new ICA that would support the Trump-Russia story instead. Brennan got to work twisting the facts to fit Obama’s agenda, sidelining actual Russia experts who disagreed, and ignoring any intelligence that contradicted the plan. This wasn’t an honest mistake. It was a coordinated lie.
Brennan handpicked a tiny group, basically one main drafter, to produce the final ICA, which conveniently claimed, “Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President-Elect Trump’s election chances…” That was January 6, 2017. The intelligence community went from denying Russian preference for Trump to claiming it “with high confidence” in less than a month. That’s not evidence evolving, that’s corruption.
Comey then ran with it, briefing Trump under false pretenses, using the dossier as bait in what can only be described as an attempted setup. But Trump didn’t fall for it because, frankly, he had no clue what Comey was talking about, because it was all fiction.
Tulsi Gabbard didn’t pull any punches. She named names: “President Obama, Hillary Clinton, John Brennan, James Clapper, James Comey and others… knowingly lied as they repeated the contrived narrative…” She even pointed out that Brennan used the fake dossier even after knowing it was debunked: “He directed senior CIA officials to use it anyway.” Think about that — these weren’t accidental mistakes. These were deliberate moves designed to interfere with the peaceful transfer of power.
To back it all up, Gabbard unsealed a 2020 House Intel Committee report that Adam Schiff had kept hidden. It had been classified and stashed away at CIA headquarters. That report confirms that Brennan was “instrumental in proliferating the dossier,” even before Clinton officially funded Steele’s work. According to the report, Brennan had already planted the seeds of the collusion hoax and pressured the FBI to open their probe. It was political sabotage disguised as intelligence.
And the real kicker? While the dossier falsely claimed Russia had compromising material — or "Kompromat" — on Trump, it turns out they might’ve had the goods on Hillary. The report revealed that Russian intelligence had DNC communications describing Clinton’s mental state during the 2016 election. She was allegedly dealing with “uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness” and was placed on “heavy tranquilizers.” Apparently, even Obama and top Democrats were alarmed and thought it could hurt her chances in November.
Unlike the Steele dossier, this wasn’t baseless gossip. The committee reviewed tons of source material and interviewed FBI agents and intelligence officers. Putin, expecting Clinton to win, may have held onto that info to use against her later. So while the media screamed "Trump-Russia," the real story — the one with actual evidence — was ignored or buried.
Gabbard has now sent a criminal referral to the DOJ, stating that, “The evidence that we have found and that we have released directly point to President Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment.” The DOJ says they’re forming a strike force to investigate, and Attorney General Pam Bondi promises to “leave no stone unturned.”
Now, of course, Obama denies any wrongdoing. And ironically, thanks to Trump’s recent Supreme Court win on presidential immunity, Obama might be protected. But the others involved? Not so lucky.
We don’t know yet who might be prosecuted, but one thing is clear — the stain of corruption is already baked into Obama’s legacy. The media won’t talk about it much. But the facts are finally catching up.
The recent release of declassified material has brought new clarity to the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation, and the names involved are sadly all too familiar. What’s coming to light is a real Russian conspiracy, but not the one the media and political establishment spent years pushing. Instead, this APPEARS to be a coordinated effort by high-ranking Obama administration officials to fabricate a Russian collusion narrative, with the help of a compliant press corps that never asked the tough questions. Congress is now revisiting the key figures involved, and many of them are REPORTEDLY seeking legal counsel as the investigation unfolds.
Former CIA Director John Brennan is emerging as a central figure in this deception. Despite testifying in 2017 that the Steele dossier wasn’t used as a basis for the Intelligence Community’s assessment, NEW evidence indicates that he personally insisted on its inclusion. He did so over the objections of the CIA’s top Russia experts, who warned that the dossier didn’t meet even the most basic standards of intelligence tradecraft. When confronted with the flaws in the report, Brennan ALLEGEDLY dismissed the concerns, saying, “Yes, but doesn’t it ring true?” Brennan was also the one who briefed President Obama in 2016 about Hillary Clinton’s plan to frame Trump with a Russian scandal, months before he actively helped incorporate the very dossier secretly funded by her campaign.
James Clapper, the former Director of National Intelligence, is also implicated. He’s REPORTEDLY “lawyered up” in anticipation of what’s to come. Clapper knew early on, from multiple assessments, that Russia likely did not influence the election through cyber means. In fact, several internal reports clearly stated that foreign adversaries had not used cyberattacks to alter the outcome of the U.S. election. Yet somehow, just days later, those conclusions were reversed. Clapper, Brennan, and other top officials met and decided to issue a new assessment that painted a very different picture, one that aligned with the Clinton narrative. Brennan then handpicked analysts who would support this revised story, ignoring the earlier conclusions that had been based on actual intelligence.
James Comey, the former FBI director, played his own key role by green-lighting investigations rooted in what now appears to be manufactured intelligence. The FBI had early indications that the Steele dossier was unreliable and politically motivated. They were even told by the CIA that Carter Page, a Trump associate, was a U.S. intelligence asset, not a Russian spy. Despite this, Comey and others pushed ahead, ignoring countervailing facts, violating protocol, and even misleading the FISA court to keep the investigation alive. When pressed later about the lack of evidence, Comey absurdly claimed he wasn’t familiar with the word “collusion,” yet he had no problem tossing around terms like “in cahoots.” He also denied knowing that the Clinton campaign had funded the dossier, an unlikely claim, given his central role.
Andrew McCabe, former acting FBI director and now a CNN contributor, was fired for lying multiple times during internal investigations, including under oath. He also shows up in the new documents as someone who actively blocked congressional efforts to interview key FBI analysts involved in crafting the intelligence community’s assessment. According to Congress, McCabe essentially walled off at least 30 FBI employees who could have shed light on the dossier and how it was used.
These names, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, McCabe, are not new. They were omnipresent during the media’s push to validate the Russian collusion narrative. In my view, behind the scenes, they knew there was no real evidence. Rather than speak out, they allowed a false narrative to flourish. When Obama ordered a new intelligence assessment that contradicted earlier findings, anonymous sources leaked it to the media, which gladly ran with it. No one leaked the truth.
Figures like Adam Schiff, now a Democratic senator, went even further by claiming, long after Special Counsel Mueller found NO collusion, that he had secret evidence to the contrary. That evidence never materialized, and it’s now clear that the intelligence community itself rejected the collusion theory from the start.
The real story here is about a political hit job, unlike anything we've seen before. While the media once again tries to bury the truth, just like they did with the Hunter Biden laptop, this time, the facts are breaking through. The narrative that dominated headlines and divided the country for years was built on a foundation of deception. Now, with these new revelations, the truth is finally emerging, and it doesn’t bode well for those who manufactured the hoax.
https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/ … hatgpt.com
https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/ … hatgpt.com
https://www.odni.gov/files/ODNI/documen … hatgpt.com
Key Findings Summary from link
Early Political Bias Identified in Intelligence Leadership
Certain senior officials within the CIA, FBI, and DOJ are documented as expressing early concern about Trump's potential 2016 victory.
Several emails and memos reveal that intelligence officials were sharing speculative concerns and politically charged opinions in classified settings.
Use of Unverified Opposition Research
The Steele dossier (funded in part by the DNC and Clinton campaign) was used to obtain FISA warrants to surveil Trump campaign affiliates, without full disclosure to the FISA court regarding its political origins.
The document includes communications between DOJ officials admitting doubts about the dossier's reliability even as it was being submitted as supporting evidence.
Obama-Era Briefings and Strategy Meetings
Logs and memos show that senior White House staff, including then-Vice President Biden, Susan Rice, and John Brennan, were present at meetings discussing strategies to “contain” or “manage” the Trump transition.
A handwritten note attributed to Brennan includes mention of “HRC’s plan to vilify Trump with Russia allegations.”
Warnings Ignored by Leadership
Internal intelligence memos from as early as August 2016 raised concerns about the politicization of intelligence and lack of corroborating evidence for Trump–Russia collusion.
These warnings were either downplayed or ignored by top officials, according to whistleblower emails and testimony.
CIA and FBI Coordination Outside Legal Boundaries
A newly declassified communication reveals CIA involvement in domestic intelligence collection, which may have violated its legal limitations.
FBI officials coordinated informants and overseas contacts (e.g., Halper, Mifsud) with possible State Department and foreign intelligence awareness, without proper oversight.
Post-Election Efforts to Undermine the Trump Presidency
After Trump’s election, the report details meetings and intelligence tasking designed to sustain the Russia narrative even as official findings grew thin.
Gabbard’s memo emphasizes that political objectives continued even after no hard evidence of collusion was found.
Contents Overview from document link provided
Pages 1–10: Executive summary and timeline (prepared by Gabbard’s team).
Pages 11–25: Internal memos from DOJ and FBI regarding the Steele dossier and FISA applications.
Pages 26–38: CIA and White House communications, including Brennan’s handwritten notes.
Pages 39–47: Whistleblower statements, inspector general interviews, and DNI conclusion.
The evidence is there for all to read.
Related Discussions
- 27
FBI launches criminal investigations of John Brennan, James Comey
It's about time!"CIA Director John Ratcliffe referred Brennan for criminal investigation to the FBIEXCLUSIVE: Former CIA Director John Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey are under criminal investigation for potential wrongdoing related to the Trump–Russia probe, including allegedly...
- 6159
Did Trump Really Try To Implement a Coup?
All of the available evidence seems to say so.Here is a workable definition of a coups d'état as an "organized effort to effect sudden and irregular (e.g., illegal or extra-legal) removal of the incumbent executive authority of a national government, or to displace the authority of the highest...
- 246
President Obama and his administration spied on President elect Trump?
This is a shocking relvelation, if true, undermines our whole democratic process...Why is this not headline news?
- 92
Russian Hacking - What Will Trump Do When He Learns It's Real?
Donald Trump, as late as January 1, 2017, has refused to acknowledge what most everybody, Democrats and Republicans (less Trump supporters) alike know to be true ... Vladimir Putin is behind the arguably successful attack on America's democracy by swaying American voters to vote for Trump rather...
- 59
Trump Issues Declassifcation Order on ALL Messages related to Russia!
President Trump issued an immediate declassification order on the Carter Page FISA warrant, AND ALL Text messages (unredacted ) related to the Russia hoax from James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Bruce Ohr, Peter Strzok, and Lisa Page.The DOJ is caught in a tight spot since the President already has all...
- 31
Intel Community Changed Whistleblower firsthand requirements in August
Interesting how the Intel Community changed the requirements for a whistleblower complaint to no longer need to have firsthand knowledge to make a complaint in August of 2019. In September 2019, a whistleblower complaint based on second-hand information is filed against President Donald...