Johnson Amendment restricts non-profits from endorsing candidates

Jump to Last Post 1-2 of 2 discussions (11 posts)
  1. Kathleen Cochran profile image71
    Kathleen Cochranposted 2 days ago

    First Reagan did away with the Fairness Doctrine and now we have flavors of news.
    Now Trump wants to do away with the Johnson Amendment so churches and non-profits can endorse candidates. Will it even make a difference? For the last 50 years many churches rated your piety by who you voted for in the last election.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/30/us/j … =url-share

    Will anybody even notice?

    1. Sharlee01 profile image84
      Sharlee01posted 2 days agoin reply to this

      I noticed... I did not read the article; I am just offering my view.

      You bring up two significant policy shifts that highlight how the boundaries between media, religion, and politics have evolved over time. The repeal of the Fairness Doctrine in 1987 during Reagan’s administration ended the requirement that broadcasters present contrasting views on controversial issues. Many credit this with the rise of more ideologically focused media outlets. Some see that as harmful to balanced public discourse, while others view it as a necessary expansion of free speech in media.

      As for the Johnson Amendment, which has been targeted by Trump and others for repeal, it applies not just to churches but to all 501(c)(3) tax-exempt nonprofit organizations. That includes public charities, educational institutions, hospitals, foundations, and cultural organizations like museums and symphonies. Under current law, these organizations are prohibited from directly endorsing or opposing political candidates.

      Supporters of repealing the amendment argue that it restricts free speech and religious liberty, particularly for pastors and religious leaders. Opponents warn that lifting the restriction could politicize charitable organizations, blur the lines between nonprofits and political campaigns, and raise concerns about tax-deductible donations being used for partisan purposes.

      Whether repeal would significantly change things is debatable. As you noted, some churches and nonprofits already signal political leanings in informal ways. But formal endorsements and political campaigning from tax-exempt groups could shift the landscape in ways that go beyond what's currently accepted, potentially affecting public trust and nonprofit neutrality.

      Interesting thread—food for thought.

      1. Kathleen Cochran profile image71
        Kathleen Cochranposted 2 days agoin reply to this

        I have a hub about the Fairness Doctrine and how I've wrestled with its removal as a journalist. I've gone back and forth, but my ultimate conclusion is that removing it put a loaded gun into the hands of a three-year-old. We just weren't responsible enough to have that intellectual guard rail removed.

        1. Sharlee01 profile image84
          Sharlee01posted 2 days agoin reply to this

          Thanks for sharing that, Kathleen. I appreciate your insight as an author; it adds a personal layer to the conversation. I can absolutely see where you're coming from with the "loaded gun" analogy. It does feel like once that guardrail was gone, media outlets became more about confirmation than conversation. That said, I still wrestle with where the line should be drawn between protecting open discourse and maintaining responsibility. It's tough, because while the Fairness Doctrine may have encouraged balance, it also raised questions about who gets to define what's "fair" and who enforces it. Still, your point about us not being ready for its removal really hits. Maybe the issue isn't free speech itself, but how we, as a society, have handled it since.

          I actually lean toward your view on this, Kathleen. I’d really like to read your hub, would you mind sharing the title? I’ve read quite a few of your poems since I’m naturally drawn to poetry, and I especially enjoyed the ones that touch on nature. It really resonates with me. One of the things I try to include in my daily gratitude list is something I noticed about nature that day; it helps keep me grounded and connected.

          1. Kathleen Cochran profile image71
            Kathleen Cochranposted 32 hours agoin reply to this
            1. Sharlee01 profile image84
              Sharlee01posted 31 hours agoin reply to this

              I really appreciated this perspective. The line "Too many people don’t... They not only don’t want to hear another point of view, they want anyone who doesn’t see things the way they do to be silenced, sequestered, or shot" really hit home. It’s a bold but honest way of pointing out how far we've strayed from civil discourse. I also liked the comparison to Castor oil—"It’s good for you whether you like it or not. In fact, the more you don’t like it, the better it probably is for you." That perfectly captures the discomfort and value in hearing viewpoints that challenge our own. We need more reminders like this to stay open-minded, even when it’s uncomfortable. The article was chock-full of food for thought, and I genuinely enjoyed it.

              1. Kathleen Cochran profile image71
                Kathleen Cochranposted 31 hours agoin reply to this

                Thanks for the read.

                1. Sharlee01 profile image84
                  Sharlee01posted 31 hours agoin reply to this

                  I’ve read many of your poems and articles, and I also try to read some of the other users' hubs, I converse with them here. I think it’s a great way to get a more well-rounded sense of the person I’m conversing with. A chat alone doesn’t always reveal the full picture. I’m often pleasantly surprised by what I discover in people’s writing; it adds depth to their character, beyond just politics.

        2. Ken Burgess profile image72
          Ken Burgessposted 33 hours agoin reply to this

          I would counter that with it gives communities (church - Temple - etc.) the ability to be more represented.

          Which might not be a bad thing, considering businesses have been able to do just that for a while now... and businesses are far less likely to have the interests of your average American citizen in mind when they are selecting the politicians they are backing.

  2. Kathleen Cochran profile image71
    Kathleen Cochranposted 31 hours ago

    "I would counter that with it gives communities (church - Temple - etc.) the ability to be more represented."

    They enjoy tax-exempt benefits for respecting the separation of church and state our country was founded on.

    1. Sharlee01 profile image84
      Sharlee01posted 31 hours agoin reply to this

      I can only agree.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)