Obama promised to bring home the troops. When he took office there were 34,000 now under Team Obama there are nearly 100,000.
$4 billion a month spent. Building roads and schools for people who don't want the USA in their country. http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-689
The United States PAYS the Taliban to protect the cargo they need delivered by truck, then they turn around and fight them? It's not ironic... it really happens. The War Lords allow passage of military vehicles only if they are paid to pass. The Taliban controls the War Lords. So the USA is paying the Taliban to fight them. Very messed up.
Money that could and needs to be spent "At Home".
Someone has got to tell the United States of America that you can NOT legislate Belief Systems. You can not force your will on people who do not believe the same as you.
The time to get out of Afghanistan was long before the USA ever entered. You can choose to blame Bush... or you can choose to blame Obama... for extending the Failed Bush Policies.
In either case it's total failure?
Anyone remember who "Won" the Vietnam War?
And now this as proof of failure:
"KABUL – Afghan President Hamid Karzai threatened over the weekend to quit the political process and join the Taliban if he continued to come under outside pressure to reform, several members of parliament said Monday."
The funny thing is that while pundits have been telling us that Afghanistan is a totally different war than Iraq was, we seem to be fighting it the same way.
Import a whole lot of soldiers and pay the enemy off to not fight with us. Eventually they get the message and stop fighting realizing that it is better to get a paycheck than it is to get killed. Capitalism at its best. Getting paid to do nothing.
I guess the American taxpayer is predestined to work for the rest of the world.
I'm pretty sure that receiving a check for not doing something is not capitalism!
Just a guess
70% of the net worth of the US is owned by only 10% of the population.
They are receiving big checks for doing nothing.
That's because they have already done what they needed to do to ensure their wealth! Jealous?
Maybe if you catch up with one of those COO's or CEO's on a beach in the Bahamas they will let you know what they have worked on that day.
If I coud get a buck for every wingut post based on a false premise, I could retire.
Obama ran on a platform to end our involvement in Iraq. He committed to put resources INTO Afghanistan - as a candidate.
We don't know how that will turn out. I don't like the escalation, but I HOPE that the political situation can be stablilized and the Afghan people step up to provide for their own security.
I fault the post on 2 points. We don't know the outcome in Afghanistan. The position of President Obama was deliberately misrepresented.
by Dave McClure8 years ago
------------------------------------------------------------KABUL, Afghanistan - President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan said yesterday that he is in full agreement with President Obama's newly announced strategy for the...
by TimTurner7 years ago
Most of you know I am very critical of Obama but it looks like he is going to send about 20,000 to 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan which is what needs to be done. At least, that is the rumor on the street.For...
by Gary Anderson5 years ago
Thought you might be interested to know that the Taliban went to Texas in 1997, and then refused to build a pipeline talked about in the article below. Turns out, the US had motive to go to war in Afghanistan way before...
by Ralph Deeds6 years ago
Richard Holbrooke warned of the danger of Afghanistan becoming another Vietnam. He opposed Obama's surge. He was working on a negotiated settlement of what amounts to a civil war between the Taliban and the government...
by ryankett6 years ago
Firstly, let me point out that I am a full supporter of the continued efforts in Afghanistan. Whilst I am still slightly cynical of the possible underlying motives, there can be no doubt that the country under Taliban...
by onlinearticlespk6 years ago
Taliban in Afghanistan are fighting for their homeland. is it justified to call them a terrorist when there is no proof of their involvement of 9/11 which is used as a base against them? cabn any country declare...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.