Posted May 05, 2010 by Peter Gorenstein in Yahoo Finance.
"Even a cynic can find Washington's hypocrisy shocking at times. The Wall Street Journal reports today a House bill that would force lawmakers to make greater disclosures on financial transactions and disallow them from trading on nonpublic information is going nowhere fast.
That's right. Members of Congress are currently allowed to profit on insider trading!
The bill, which has been languishing in the House for four years, would require elected officials "to make their financial transactions public within 90 days of a purchase or sale" and "prohibit lawmakers from trading in financial markets based on nonpublic information they learn on the job," the WSJ reports.
It seems they're above the transparency they've been calling for on Wall Street.
http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/co … 78701.html
This comes a day after the same newspaper reported several lawmakers profited by betting against the housing and stock market in 2008. And some did it using derivatives they've recently been railing against."
Ques. -- Do you think that any sitting US congressperson deserves to be re-elected?
What! The "slime on the hill" profited from their unique position?
"I have the consolation of having added nothing to my private fortune during my public service, and of retiring with hands clean as they are empty."
We need to take the money out of their hands. Soon you would find them fleeing Congress like a rat abandons a sinking ship.
This needs more attention. I think members of Congress should have to disclose all of their trading, because they are in privileged positions that give them access to all sorts of information that they could profit from. When they get rich by trading on that inside information, they are ripping off your average investor, which is why it's a crime when anyone else does it. Thank you for posting this.
Rhamson & DB -
Yup - fine bunch we've got. Hopefully, in Nov. we'll start tossing some out.
Also, I have a feeling we may not have heard the last of this.
The funny thing is that we have elected and re-elected these "Slimebags" time and time again. What is it in the American paradigm that compells us to act this way?
We all know that money is at the root of the whole problem yet we continue to up the ante for them to raise as much money (legally or illegally) so they may remain in power to practice more of the same. Public supported campaign financing is needed more now than ever. With the money as a distraction they haven't a chance of governing objectively.
My father always said "We have the best government money can buy".
The bottom line is that Americans, on the whole, are not much different than their congressmen. You can blame them for the ills, but greed is pretty prevalent everywhere. Until we are individually ready to give up the greed that they have access to (if we were in their boots) then we will have to put up with it. If you were in their shoes, how tempting would it be to do what they are doing?
I have often said let congress have the same retirement and health plan benefits that the rest of America has and see how that fits. But until Americans get past their greed and entitlement issues, it's a symptom of society, and we all share the blame until we are all changed.
That's my two cents.
I agree with much of what you are saying but are we to have no change because we will not practice what we preach?
If the morals of the "Slimebag Congressman" is an extention of our own morality how can we ever expect change. That wreaks of a radical solution on the scale of a revolution and installation of a benevolent dictator to effect any change. Is there any sanity left to confront the problem and make the sacrifices neccessary to put us back on a healthy road? I hate to think we are doomed to wallow in this slime pit with our congressional agendas.
Politicians get re-elected by "bringing home the bacon" (read "pork").
Most people have a low opinion of other people's representatives, but if their own can get globs of gov't money for unneeded projects, he gets re-elected.
Being bribed with our own money is not only greedy, its ignorant.
My 2 cts.
It is funny you use the term ignorant. Thomas Jefferson forsaw the fruits of congressional corruption so long ago. Why are we so ignorant of it today?
"We must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty or profusion and servitude. If we run into such debt, as that we must be taxed in our meat and in our drink, in our necessaries and our comforts, in our labors and our amusements, for our calling and our creeds...[we will] have no time to think, no means of calling our miss-managers to account but be glad to obtain subsistence by hiring ourselves to rivet their chains on the necks of our fellow-sufferers... And this is the tendency of all human governments. A departure from principle in one instance becomes a precedent for[ another]... till the bulk of society is reduced to be mere automatons of misery... And the fore-horse of this frightful team is public debt. Taxation follows that, and in its train wretchedness and oppression."
I hate to think of myself as a automaton but the reality of it is becoming clearer.
It's almost spooky - reading Jefferson's words.
He and the other framers of our constitution made sure we had the necessary remedies available to deal with these dangers, but they couldn't insure that we'd be smart enough to know when we were being had...and smart enough to know what to do about it.
We owe it to every serviceman serving, every taxpayer laboring and to our descendants to become informed and vote. Never give blind loyalty to any candidate, philosophy or party. Make them earn your vote.
My thoughts, my rant.
Do as I say not as I do.
Dodd took a Jumbo loan payoff from Countrywide... he's a criminal... and he's the guy authoring "financial reform".
“When the people find that they can vote themselves money,
that will herald the end of the republic.”
- Benjamin Franklin
by Jack Lee 2 weeks ago
The latest call for a new FBI investigation on Judge Kavanauh for something that happened 35 years ago in high school is just insane. If this is the new standard, I want all Senators and Congressmen undergoes the same scrutiny. Would any one these 535 people pass this test? The arguement that a...
by mikelong 7 years ago
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/07 … k1%7C77674If businesses could play by the rules, perhaps they wouldn't need to be watched...
by Stacie L 7 years ago
At Least 13 New Republican Members Of Congress Hire Corporate Lobbyists To Manage Their Office To many Americans, Washington is fundamentally broken. While corporations enjoy record profits and executives reward themselves with million-dollar bonuses, lobbyists have gamed the system so...
by Ralph Schwartz 19 months ago
Do you think Trump will push for Term Limits to shake up Congress?There are many members of Congress who have lived most of their adult lives as elected members of Congress - clearly in defiance to what the founders intended a representative government to be. Are you in support of limiting...
by Catherine Tally 3 years ago
Is Ted Cruz a hypocrite for wanting to repeal obamacare and then turning around to sign up for it?Ted Cruz, in his presidential bid, has stated that his first goal will be to repeal the Affordable Health care Act aka Obamacare. Funny that he is now in the federal exchange since his wife no...
by Stacie L 6 years ago
The 15 richest members of CongressDemocrats making the list include former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and former presidential candidate John Kerry. But which Republicans hold the top two spots?By CNBC and Roll CallCNBC on MSN MoneyMingling money and powerRecently, Roll Call analyzed the financial...
|HubPages Device ID|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Google Analytics|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel|
|Google Hosted Libraries|
|Google AdSense Host API|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels|
|Author Google Analytics|
|Amazon Tracking Pixel|