I came across an interesting article today. It posits the arguments AGAINST abolishing slavery (the arguments that came about 150 years ago) next to the arguments for AGAINST abolishing government.
Just wanted some comments.
You use the word "gov't" too loosely. Of course govt can be slavery.
Depends soley upon the gov't. Gov'ts can be created by force of by the will of the people.
Man needs to be governed.
He is much to impetuous, curious, imaginative to be uncontrolled... controlled he must be.
He is a social predator. One which is still driven by a need to kill.
If he is to develop into an amenable, civil, social creature he must be given time for natural selection to sublimate his predatory propensity.
Unfortunately, there is not enuf time left for contemoorary man to experience that metamorphosis.
What a load of carp. Column B is a list of strawman arguments, a false representation of the legitimate reasons for forming governments. Most primitive societies have very little or absolutely no government; if you want to live in a dung / vine hut and wear a loin cloth you are welcome to, but it will never happen here.
Slaves did not elect their masters.
Governments are not "natural" they are the products of societal evolution.
Awwww you said carp!
The game warden's comin' after you Ron!
I agree with you for once.
To the original poster:
The article's author is off on a tangent that's off-kilter.
Slavery is wrong and unnecessary,
while government is right and necessary.
(Although government, taken too far and given too much power, becomes a form of slavery. Case in point, America's leadership today is starting to head down that bad road, and needs immediate reform by the people.)
To cancel slavery, society had to grow up to the understanding of the horrible wrongness of it and the advantages of not having it. With government, well, not in 2010, may be in 3010 or smth.? I don't know. I can imagine people becoming so civilized, that they just follow written and unspoken rules, that are ingrained into their brain and psyche, without necessity of constantly reinforcing it. But we are not there yet. Far from it. It's a distant future, very distant...
This biblical god thing ok's the ownership and beating of slaves.
by Sooner284 years ago
What is hagiography you ask? I just recently learned the term, and thought it applied perfectly to the way many on the American right attempt to argue for many of their positions. Hagiography is defined as...
by Mahaveer Sanglikar9 months ago
Why there is poverty in specific people while others are well to do people? Who are responsible for poverty - the poor people themselves, Government policies or the system?
by Josak4 years ago
One of the greatest criticisms leveled at socialist and perceived socialist nations is their high taxes, usually reinforced with the example of France and it's high tax rates under a newly elected socialist...
by lifedancer6 years ago
Sparks of change in the Middle East make me wonder why U.S. people are so complacent about the economic crisis that deregulation of banking and investing caused the world. Why are they not holding there...
by James Smith4 years ago
This is the alternative thread to Sooner's arguments against capitalism. Not just to be facetious, but to get it on record 1 - It is inherently aggressive. It prohibits voluntary exchange and free enterprise, and steals...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.