http://hotair.com/archives/2011/02/15/v … -proposal/
Lol even the reporters there think Obama is clueless... besides being a liar! His budget actually increases the debt by more than 7 trillion dollars!!!
The he says we have to live within our means while dismissing every recomendation of his OWN deficit commission!
Now now now. Give the man a chance. I'm sure it won't be long before his greatness the naked emperor will come up with an appropriate explanation for all this including one of his infamous re-definitions. Like.....reminding us that we really have NO DEFICIT----we're just financially-challenged! HAAA
"Washington (CNN) -- President Barack Obama called on congressional Republicans to engage in an "adult conversation" about the federal government's long-term financial health Tuesday, warning that serious debt reduction will remain impossible without bipartisan agreement on how best to stabilize Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid costs.
Leaders of both parties have to be willing to make unpopular concessions, he said, while declining to specify exactly what form those concessions should take.
"I expect that all sides will have to do a little bit of posturing on television and speak to their constituencies, and rally the troops and so forth," Obama told reporters at a hurriedly scheduled news conference. "But ultimately, what we need is a reasonable, responsible and initially, probably, somewhat quiet and toned-down conversation about ... where can we compromise and get something done."
I hope the republicans in Washington are more capable of an adult conversation than the dingbats on hubpages.
That doesn't even merit the respect of a response, Doug.
I swear you are incapable of seeing anything wrong with liberals! Obama created a commission on debt reduction they gave him recomendations on entitlements...which he ignored! He is supposed to LEAD on this not the republicans! If there is anyone not being adult about the budget... its Obama!!
Hey Lady love, as you said- Obama is to lead, however, what you failed to understand is that it still requires concessions. WOW!
Well cags concessions are a given sooo where were Obama's concessions from the recommendations of his own debt committee? He rejected every one out of hand! His own committee!!!
I'm not rejecting the actions of what Obama has done with regards to his own party. I am talking about concessions are required by other sides, not just one. That's all.
Cagsil - You win the prize for hitting the nail directly on the head and hard.
I make no bones about being liberal, but progress will require that both sides negotiate - and nobody is going to get everything they want. In fact, if they do a good job, everybody will be thoroughly pissed, including me.
In a nutshell (which is where Brenda and LaLo came from), taxes will go up and spending will be cut. Some programs will be strengthened and stabilized - others will be eliminated. In the end, the cash going out will equal the cash going in. At that point we can address the national debt.
The question is whether the folks in Washington can quit posturing long enough to do some damn hard work. Then we voters have to get over being pissed and re-elect those from both parties who were parties to making a deal and cut loose the crybabies who refused to participate.
I'm confused! One minute LL tells us that Obama is a liberal, the next he's a socialist.
Is he both at the same time or does he alternate, if the latter, is this random or timetabled?
How about if the Republicans, whose one and only raison d'etre in the Congress is to slash the deficit -- per their "mandate" from the American people (all 25% of them who voted in 2010 ), do what THEY said they were going to do?
Maybe they can bring a reasoned and acceptable set of COMPROMISES to Obama.
Newsflash: It took years to get the country into this debt.
We cannot expect to erase it in 2 years.
Meanwhile, Obama understands that as we reduce the deficit we also MUST invest in certain programs or risk both short- and long-term negative consequences.
The Republicans seem to think we should hack indiscriminately and then toss the carcass on a bonire. There can be no phoenix rising out of those ashes....
Very interesting when you look at the breakdown of our federal spending.
Frankly, anyone who is over 65 rants about government spending, they should voluntarily give up their Social Security and Medicare benefits.
That will leave a whole lot more for the rest of the country who are NOT on the government's "teat."
How about letting those younger than 25 opt out of the Social Security Ponzi scheme?
Let them put money into private retirement accounts?
Why shouldn't those older people be screaming?
Its not their fault politicians have used that money to pay for welfare programs for lazy people.
Sooo you want the people that dutifuly paid their money into the system to just surrender it? Tell you what give me back what I paged in plus some token interest say 4% and you can sign me out of social security and medicaid.
Russians and Chinese seem to have embraced the spirit of $$$ enterprise pretty darn well.
by lady_love158 9 years ago
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 … TopOpinionPretend the economy is growing, print money to boost the market and maintain that illusion, pretend he is actually doing something to reduce the deficit while sitting back and forcing the republicans to make the tough decisions, then cast...
by Madison Miller 9 years ago
Could we fix our budget deficit by cutting back the Federal Government's budget by 1% per year...for the next 20 years?
by Ralph Deeds 7 years ago
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/31/opini … ef=opinionSocial Security, Present and FutureBy THE EDITORIAL BOARDPublished: March 30, 2013 6 Comments"In the fight over the federal budget deficit, Social Security has so far been untouched. That may soon change.Today's Editorials"In last...
by Susan Reid 8 years ago
Gee. I've been led to believe it's all Obama's fault.Guess that's simply NOT TRUE!http://youtu.be/LcvLHHMC4iI
by Ralph Deeds 8 years ago
Paul Krugman:" Back in 2010, self-styled deficit hawks — better described as deficit scolds — took over much of our political discourse. At a time of mass unemployment and record-low borrowing costs, a time when economic theory said we needed more, not less, deficit spending, the scolds...
by Texasbeta 10 years ago
Republicans like Boehner will shed a tear when asked about THEIR federal job, but when the topic of you losing YOUR federal job, they respond: "So be it."http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/02/ … XO20110215BTW- He also lied about how many jobs were in question as well...just to...
Copyright © 2021 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|