http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/breaki … 6031816181
Bill Henson displays pictures of naked teenage girls as art. Many of them in provocative poses. I don't even understand how some people are even on his side - and the legal case against him may be dropped!
I'm also surprised that Google image search also allows this type of material - it should be banned.
Sometimes art just goes too far!
I took a look at them as well. While I don't find them particularly good or interesting, I don't find anything particularly pornographic about them either.
I looked via Google and I don't see any overt sexual content 'beyond' the art expression, the art images from the sixties that we find quite acceptable due to their 'age' are far more explicit and overtly sexual.
Maybe something like this is actuallyrequired to point up the difference between the everyday filth and depravity that floods the internet and artistic sexual content.
Screaming abuse at this kind of art says everything about the viewer and nothing about the art.
I thought underaged nude photos were illegal activity?
As far as Google, they are like any Page; do you publish because you can and thats it; (Freedom of Speach) or...
do you conside the Moral responsibility, and result of your decision to publish?
From what I see as a society norms, it's dam the morals and go to print, and forget any consiquence of it.
Looked at it on google images. Forgetting the morality, the photography is awful. Maybe the worst I ever seen. Sell by getting a depravity buzz going and people think there is something of substance in this crap.
I've got no problem with pornography - I have a collection myself.
However I do have a problem with a picture of a nude 13 year old lying on a bed with her legs spread!
Strange how this works isn't it. You scream in protest at an art picture but feel that it is ok to own pornography, I stand up and protect the art - but do not own or use any pronography whatsoever - because it is at the expense of human dignity and the the people who make the stuff. In my opinion pronography is worse than drugs and far more insidious.
I have no problem with pornographic art when someone is of legal age and consents to it. I do have a problem when paedophiles go to jail for this sort of thing, but people who do it for art don't. Double standard much?
No - I don't think it is double standards, it is the intent. Paedophiles harm children, art informs society.
Pornography harms everyone involved in its making and those who use it. Picture galleries of yong women provocatively dressed reduce female to a commodity - and the two work hand in hand like pot and crack.
Oh so when that 13 year old grows up and looks back on the nude photos, they won't wish that their guardians had stopped them doing it?
How about we call pornography art while we're at it, that will make it ok.
I think that 13 year old will look back and be proud of having a beautiful body at that age, proud to be the focus of world attention and know perfectly well that this is nothing to do with pornography or any seedy peep show mentality.
Maybe in your perfect world. But I wouldn't want naked photos of my underage daughter posted on the internet for any dirty old man to see!
You are describing your own mind and your own fears - nothing to do with these art pictures. You are also showing your preconceptions that those who look at pornography are 'dirty old men' - even though you admit to owning and using it yourself.
You have every right to voice your objection to this kind of art, as people did to the 'art' that had a cut-in-half pig in a formalin filled fish tank, or the stakc of everyday bricks that sold for a million quid. But surely you can see that good art reflects ourselves back to ourself and what you really see is yourself ?
I'm not talking about pornography in general; I'm talking about child pornography. And there are a certain type of audience who are more likely to want to view that kind of work.
I've said my piece. My views are that this kind of work is too close to child pornography to be thrown at random on the internet where both art lovers AND paedophiles can have free access to it.
Is it really art or just someone trying to cause a stir and gain noteriety? I didn't go to check it out so I'll just take posters at their word, regarding the quality and content.
Curious, did the parents of these children approve of the pics?
We are on a slippery slope as a society when children are exploited in the name of art. Reminds me of the precursors to the fall of the Roman Empire.
Good point. Sometimes I think modeling agencies are no better when they dress 12 year old 'models' up and parade them down a runway dressed in all sorts of skimpy outfits. The world has become too lax in looking out for children.
by Jean Bakula 24 months ago
When our hubs were once chosen, we had a way to see what was supposed to be fixed before it appeared on a niche site. Now I don't see anything like that. It could be me, but there was a way to see what they wanted added or deleted.It's very frustrating. Yesterday I was told my hub on Zeus, the...
by ahorseback 6 months ago
Did my own "Special Investigation" looking for pictures of Democratic Joe Biden perv-groping women and little girls , then searched for actual evidence of Trump and his accusers ?Which one's pictures comes up first do you suppose ?
by ngureco 12 months ago
Why Do Wives Get Mad With Husbands Watching Porn? How Does It Interfere With Marriage?
by Sooner28 6 years ago
“Anti-bullying legislation is exactly the same,” Mr. Fischer said. “It’s just another thinly veiled attempt to promote the homosexual agenda. No one is in favor of anyone getting bullied for any reason, but these anti-bullying policies become a mechanism for punishing Christian students who...
by theirishobserver. 8 years ago
I have posted this thread in order to ask the question - can such criminality be eradicated - it has reached every level of society - what is wrong - what has went wrong - what can we do?Author of Books for Children Sentenced on Child Pornography ChargesThu, 08 Jul 2010 19:56:36 -0500Kevin Patrick...
by days leaper 7 years ago
What do paedophiles look for in vulnerable children?Is it luck -or unluck- of the draw, or are there processes at work? If the latter, parents may be able to wise up and better protect their children...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|