jump to last post 1-3 of 3 discussions (5 posts)

CURL: White House out of gas on remedies for pump price.

  1. OLYHOOCH profile image60
    OLYHOOCHposted 6 years ago

    President Obama hasn’t a clue what to do about high gas prices. Not a clue.

    For proof, just look at what happened in one single day last week. The White House opened by angrily haranguing oil companies for making a profit; then the brain trust in the Oval Office blamed “speculators” for pushing up the price of oil; then the president demanded that Congress do away with $4 billion in oil industry tax breaks; and finally, at day’s end, Mr. Obama begged world producers to increase crude output.

    All four are wrong-headed: Oil companies do make lots in profits, but they also pay upward of 50 percent in taxes (and employ a lot of people); speculation isn’t to blame for high prices, the lack of U.S. oil exploration and production is; ending tax subsidies for oil companies will just make the price higher, not lower; and OPEC said last month there is no shortage of oil in the market, it’s just expensive — especially if you’re paying with weak dollars (another action point on which Mr. Obama is clueless).

    At midday, the ill-prepared White House spokesman, Jay Carney, had no idea how to handle a simple question: If, say, you end all those subsidies to oil companies, won’t they just pass the cost on to consumers?

    “Look,” he said, “what I know is that gas prices are very, very high, no question. So the idea that with these subsidies oil companies are artificially depressing gas prices, tell that — go out to a gas station in Virginia or Maryland and tell that to somebody who’s paying the price.”

    The reporter broke in. “No concerns from you guys that the oil companies are going to pass this through? …”

    “What I’m saying,” Mr. Carney started saying, “is that on balance, overwhelmingly the right thing to do is eliminate these subsidies and — because the American taxpayer should not be subsidizing companies that don’t need subsidies by any stretch of the imagination.”

    “But,” the reporter pressed, “you don’t know that they won’t pass it on, do you? Is there any …”

    “I think I’ve addressed this. I’ve addressed this. What I’ve said is on balance, knowing what we know and looking — and analyzing what we know, that this is overwhelmingly the right thing to do.”

    Story Continues →

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 … or-pump-p/

    1. uncorrectedvision profile image60
      uncorrectedvisionposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      Edit.  If I want to spend a lot of time reading the news I read the news not you or hubpages.

  2. Ron Montgomery profile image60
    Ron Montgomeryposted 6 years ago


  3. profile image66
    logic,commonsenseposted 6 years ago

    Last year, the US used less gas than any year since 1989.  There is so much crude in Cushing OK, they are running out of room for it.  Canada is our largest supplier of crude.  Supply is not the issue, nor is demand.  Prices are artificially inflated by commodity traders.
    Geithner said we should accept the high prices and be ready for even higher prices.  How often does he fill up at the pump?  Guessing his driver does it for him and the American taxpayer pays for it.

    1. uncorrectedvision profile image60
      uncorrectedvisionposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      Dead Bin Laden will get the gas crisis off the front pages for a few days.