Trump’s Day One: A Bold Agenda to Reclaim America

1. 87

   Sharlee01posted 2 days ago

   
   My post is a summary of an article I came across on Fox News. He is coming out running! 
   
   Day one,   President-elect Trump is set to sign over 200 executive actions, marking a major shift in U.S. policy across a range of areas, from border security to energy to cutting costs for families. These actions aim to tackle key issues like the federal bureaucracy, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs, and more, all while staying true to Trump’s campaign promises.
   
   According to a senior official, Trump’s Day One agenda will include a number of sweeping changes. He’ll end the controversial “Catch and Release” policy, pause offshore wind leases, scrap the electric vehicle mandate, abolish the Green New Deal, and pull out of the Paris Climate Accord. The aim is to reassert control over federal policies and push forward on his vision of a more sovereign America.
   
   One of the first steps Trump will take is declaring a national border emergency. This will set the stage for a comprehensive plan to secure the southern border, including working with the military and Homeland Security to eliminate criminal cartels. Trump will also reinstate the “Remain in Mexico” policy and take action to speed up the process of sending illegal immigrants back to their home countries. He’ll order the construction of a new section of the border wall to further solidify security.
   
   On the energy front, Trump plans to “fully unleash” Alaska’s resources, addressing everything from fracking and pipelines to liquefied natural gas. His energy policies will reverse Biden-era restrictions, aiming to restore U.S. energy independence.
   
   In terms of federal bureaucracy, Trump will sign an executive order that strengthens presidential control over federal workers. He’ll institute a merit-based hiring system and even suspend security clearances for 51 national security officials involved in the Hunter Biden laptop controversy.
   
   One of the more notable actions will be ending all DEI programs across the federal government, which Trump has long criticized for promoting divisiveness. Additionally, he’ll implement a hiring freeze for government employees and push for greater control over foreign aid and NGO funding.
   
   Trump is also focused on reducing the cost of living for American families. A presidential memo will instruct all government agencies to roll back any regulations that increase costs for consumers, starting what’s expected to be a large-scale deregulation effort during his second term.
   
   The overarching goal of Trump’s Day One actions is simple: “promises made, promises kept.” His first executive orders will reflect his commitment to delivering on what he promised to voters, with an emphasis on ending government overreach and restoring American greatness.
   
   Trump also teased a move related to TikTok, which has faced legal battles in the U.S. He plans to sign an order that would extend the time before legal prohibitions take effect, giving room to negotiate terms to protect national security.
   
   With all these changes planned, the Trump administration’s first day in office is shaping up to be a “shock and awe” moment, with historic executive actions aimed at reshaping the country. As White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt put it, "The Golden Age of America will begin" once Trump takes the oath of office.
   
   Any Thoughts

   replyreport
   1. 59

      Willowarborposted 46 hours agoin reply to this

      "catch and release" is part of our actual law.  How does one go about changing such without congress?
      
      I'll be looking for the actions as will 70 some odd other million people that will put more money in our pockets.   
      
      You know the buttload of promises he made about the grocery prices? Insurance prices? Energy prices? Interest rates? Mortgage rates, housing prices, rent, you know those things...why aren't they mentioned?
        People voted with the economy /inflation as their number one concern and it looks like it is being ignored.   Chasing immigrants through McDonald's kitchen isn't going to do it for most of us.

      replyreport
      1. 87

         Sharlee01posted 46 hours agoin reply to this

         He is not modifying "catch and release" but intends to enforce its end. From what I understand, President Trump plans to sign an executive order on his first day in office to terminate the policy, which currently allows migrants apprehended at the U.S. border to be released into the community while awaiting their immigration hearings.
         
         Trump ran heavily on addressing immigration issues, as well as other significant concerns, with the economy being at the top of his list. I am not yet certain if the executive orders he signs today will directly contribute to improving the economy. However, I am more than willing to wait a few days, review all the executive orders, and then assess whether his initial actions will effectively bring about a stronger economy.
         
         I am just overjoyed to see a man in the White House who comes in with an agenda I can fully support.

         replyreport
      2. 95

         Readmikenowposted 45 hours agoin reply to this

         "catch and release" is part of our actual law."
         
         No it's not.  It's a policy.
         
         Give me the statute.

         replyreport
         1. 59

            Willowarborposted 45 hours agoin reply to this

            Why don't you look these things up yourself before you make such bold statements?  Obviously you're familiar with the law...
            
            U.S. law permits asylum seekers to stay in the country while their application is being reviewed by immigration authorities.
            
            This policy, which is part of the immigration law will not be changed without an act of Congress.  Any such orders by Trump will be quickly slapped down by the court.  Absolutely no doubt about it
            
            https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refu … %20asylum.
            
            https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil. … %20sought.

            replyreport
            1. 95

               Readmikenowposted 41 hours agoin reply to this

               Catch and release can be interpreted many ways. 
               
               The practice of catching people crossing the border illegally and taking them to migrant detention centers is a common reference.
               
               If they cross illegally they need to be deported and not taken to a migrant detention center.
               
               If they go to a legitimate port of entry and fill out a form to seek asylum; that is not considered catch and release.

               replyreport
   2. 85

      tsmogposted 45 hours agoin reply to this

      I'll be kicking back watching chaos theory unfold while entropy seeks to predict the future. It will prove to be interesting.

      replyreport
2. 59

   Willowarborposted 44 hours ago

   Trump has promised to "drill, baby, drill." But presidents don't decide how much oil gets drilled in the U.S. — oil companies do. He cannot order more oil production - we're not Saudi Arabia.  This is a global industry. Prices are set by a global supply and demand, and companies watch that very closely. And then there is a key constituency here that does not want to drill, baby, drill, as trump wants, and that is Wall Street because if oil companies drill so much that the supply of oil is greater than demand for oil, prices would plummet, and that would be bad for investors' returns....

   replyreport
   1. 95

      Readmikenowposted 41 hours agoin reply to this

      No, but by their policies they can influence oil drilling.  Here is a good article from Forbes on it.
      
      "In the U.S., energy policies can change dramatically with each new president, creating uncertainty for industries like oil and gas.
      
      One administration might push for more drilling and energy production, while the next might impose tighter restrictions. This “policy ping-pong” can make it difficult for companies to plan long-term, but it also creates opportunities for the industry to stay strong and competitive, regardless of who’s in charge.
      
      Take President Biden’s recent decision to ban new offshore drilling in over 625 million acres of federal waters. This is part of his push for more environmentally friendly energy policies, and it has been celebrated by environmental groups. However, this move has raised concerns in the oil and gas industry, as it limits access to valuable offshore drilling areas that could otherwise boost domestic energy production.
      
      But here’s the thing—this kind of decision may not last forever. Just as President Biden tightened regulations, President-elect Donald Trump promised to reverse these restrictions on his first day in office. If he follows through, it could open up vast new areas for drilling and create a more favorable environment for oil and gas companies.
      
      If Trump takes office and rolls back Biden’s drilling restrictions, it could give the oil and gas industry a huge boost. The Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (the law Biden used to limit drilling) can also be used by Trump to open up areas for new drilling.
      
      For oil and gas companies, more drilling opportunities are a chance to increase production, improve profits, and help meet both domestic and global energy needs. Trump’s focus on energy dominance—where the U.S. produces and exports more oil and gas—aligns with the industry’s goals of increasing output and reducing reliance on foreign oil.
      
      https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbook … -industry/

      replyreport
   2. 87

      Sharlee01posted 40 hours agoin reply to this

      President Trump seems to feel that the "drill, baby, drill" approach will benefit Americans and America by increasing domestic oil production, which he believes will lead to lower energy costs, job creation, and greater economic stability. He argues that by fully tapping into U.S. oil reserves, the country can become more energy independent, reducing reliance on foreign sources and strengthening national security.
      
      This approach, in his view, would also allow American companies to compete more effectively in global markets, driving economic growth and creating new jobs. Additionally, Trump believes that exporting oil will be beneficial for the U.S. by expanding its role in the global energy market. He sees the ability to export oil as a way to increase the country's influence in energy production and trade, creating new opportunities for American companies and workers.
      
      By tapping into global markets, the U.S. could benefit from higher demand for its oil and secure better prices for its energy products. This, he argues, would lead to more economic growth and strengthen the U.S. position as a leading energy producer globally. Trump also believes that increasing domestic oil production will help bring down gas prices and reduce utility costs for American households, making everyday life more affordable. Ultimately, Trump views both increased drilling and oil exports as key components of his strategy to make America more energy-independent, and economically prosperous, and to reduce the financial burden on American families. 
      
      Not sure why oil companies will object to exporting more oil to other nations, and padding their bottom line.

      replyreport
      1. 59

         Willowarborposted 40 hours agoin reply to this

         You clearly lack an understanding of how the  the oil industry works. 
         
         Oil companies already have record output. The United States is already the world's largest producer of oil and gas, and has been for the last 4 years.
         
         Among the notable skeptics is ExxonMobil CEO Darren Woods. "I don't know that there's an opportunity to unleash a lot of production in the near term," he said to Semafor. Most companies are already "optimizing their production." He doesn't see a need to expand drilling, either. "I don't think today that production in the U.S. is constrained."
         
         "We're not going to see anybody in 'drill, baby, drill' mode," Liam Mallon, head of Exxon's upstream division, told the Energy Intelligence Forum conference in London.
         
         Not sure why oil companies will object to exporting more oil to other nations, and padding their bottom line.
         
         Considering supply and demand doesn't work that way, can you explain this comment?
         
         https://theweek.com/business/economy/bi … acking-gas

         replyreport
         1. 95

            Readmikenowposted 40 hours agoin reply to this

            Are you familiar with the concept of market share?

            replyreport
         2. 87

            Sharlee01posted 40 hours agoin reply to this

            President Trump emphasized the goal of making the U.S. energy independent and a dominant force in global oil markets. He advocated for policies that would increase U.S. oil production and exports, such as opening up more federal lands for drilling and rolling back environmental regulations. His approach aimed at reducing reliance on foreign oil and potentially making the U.S. a leading exporter of oil to other nations. W.e will need to produce much more oil to export. The oil companies are overjoyed at selling more oil.
            
            By increasing U.S. production, Trump also seeks to reduce the influence of oil-producing nations like Iran, which faced sanctions under his last administration. The broader strategy is to position the U.S. as a major player in the global energy market and challenge other oil-exporting countries, including those in the Middle East, which had historically held significant market power. The aim is to create both economic leverage and geopolitical influence. 
            
            
            U.S. oil companies were generally supportive of Donald Trump’s energy policies during his last term, particularly his focus on deregulation, expanding drilling opportunities, and promoting energy independence. Under his administration, oil companies benefited from reduced environmental regulations, such as the rollback of restrictions on methane emissions and the easing of drilling limitations on public lands. These actions were seen as ways to lower operational costs and boost profitability.
            
            Trump’s push for increased oil exports would also align with the interests of major U.S. oil companies, as it would give them the opportunity to tap into a larger share of global markets. By positioning the U.S. as a top oil exporter, companies could access higher-demand regions, especially as global energy markets continue to evolve. We will be supplying more of what is demanded.

            replyreport
            1. 59

               Willowarborposted 39 hours agoin reply to this

               You're completely ignoring the reality of the situation.  Repeating trumps erroneous talking points does not make them have validity.    This is not Trump's first term.   The need to ramp up oil production is simply not there and there is no desire among corporations to do so...
               
               Big Oil doesn't need to 'drill, baby, drill'
               Trump wants to expand production. Oil companies already have record output....
               
               https://theweek.com/business/economy/bi … acking-gas
               
               Trump's Oil and Gas Donors Don't Really Want to 'Drill, Baby, Drill' — Commodities Roundup
               
               https://www.morningstar.com/news/dow-jo … es-roundup
               
               Oil Companies, Investors Talk Down Trump’s ‘Drill, Baby, Drill’ as Prices Stay Low, Exploration Budgets Shrink
               
               https://www.theenergymix.com/oil-compan … ts-shrink/
               
               Drill, Baby, Drill’ Is A Political Slogan, Not A Business Plan...
               
               https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidblack … ness-plan/
               
               “In some ways, I think the ‘drill, baby, drill,’ is old,”  according to Carolyn Kissane, associate dean of the Center for Global Affairs at New York University Kissane says. “It’s already happened or happening, and so the next administration comes in confronting a market that doesn’t necessarily need more supply.”
               
               https://texassignal.com/drill-baby-drill-not-so-fast/
               
               Drill, baby, drill? Former big oil exec says that’s exactly what the industry doesn’t need....
               
               https://sourcenm.com/2024/10/31/drill-b … esnt-need/
               
               He's a day late and a dollar short... And as usual his followers have no clue

               replyreport
               1. 87

                  Sharlee01posted 36 hours agoin reply to this

                  Thanks for your lengthy comment. We have both shared our lengthy views. Mine is mine, yours is Google.

                  replyreport
3. 59

   Willowarborposted 40 hours ago

   So who are we declaring war against? Mexico?
   
   The Alien Enemies Act can be invoked by the president without a declaration of war if a foreign government threatens or invades the United States. However, the president must wait for Congress to declare war before invoking the act based on a declared war.   Anyone?

   replyreport
4. 74

   Kathleen Cochranposted 39 hours ago

   Day One: LET THE CHAOS BEGIN!

   replyreport
   1. 100

      DrMark1961posted 38 hours agoin reply to this

      You sound like one of the Boers predicting chaos when Nelson Mandela took office.

      replyreport
5. 87

   Sharlee01posted 13 hours ago

   Trump unveils Stargate, the ‘largest AI infrastructure project in history--- America on the move.  Day two
   
   Trump is certainly working to keep up with technology and bring tons of jobs to America. He is a man with a wonderful vision. By partnering with major companies like OpenAI, Softbank, and Oracle, the Stargate project could significantly advance AI infrastructure in the U.S., positioning the country as a leader in the tech space. This vision also promises to create thousands of high-tech jobs, benefiting the American workforce. The involvement of influential CEOs like Sam Altman, Masayoshi Son, and Larry Ellison gives the project the expertise and financial backing it needs to succeed, and it demonstrates Trump’s commitment to keeping the U.S. competitive on the global stage.
   
   I think this project is a major step forward for the U.S. in terms of AI infrastructure. The scale and potential of the Stargate initiative are impressive, with a $100 billion initial investment and the possibility of reaching $500 billion. It's exciting to see that this collaboration with major players like OpenAI, Softbank, and Oracle could create thousands of American jobs, especially in cutting-edge industries tied to AI. Building data centers across the U.S. is a smart move for both technological growth and job creation. With the involvement of such influential CEOs, the project has the backing it needs to succeed, and I’m hopeful it will lead to advancements that keep the U.S. competitive on the global stage.
   
   OpenAI, co-founded by Sam Altman, has become a leader in AI research and development, working on cutting-edge technologies like GPT and DALL·E. Their work is transforming industries from healthcare to entertainment. SoftBank, led by Masayoshi Son, has been a major force in global tech investments, with its Vision Fund backing a wide range of transformative companies in AI, robotics, and telecom. Oracle, under the leadership of Larry Ellison, is a giant in cloud computing and enterprise software, and their infrastructure and data services will be crucial for supporting the AI data centers. With these three influential companies driving the Stargate project, it’s poised for success in advancing AI technology.

   replyreport
   1. 59

      Willowarborposted 12 hours agoin reply to this

      Not sure what Trump even has to do with this?  Some of these data centers have already been under construction.   These are three corporations joining together.... Seems like their alliance didn't happen overnight.

      replyreport
6. 59

   Willowarborposted 12 hours ago

   Zuck, you really are a weenie....
   
   Meta Faces Backlash As Democrat-Related Terms Disappear From Instagram...
   
   Users across Meta's platforms report two distinct issues — Instagram's blocking of Democrat-related search terms and Facebook's unexpected behavior regarding presidential account follows. Both situations have emerged during a sensitive period of political transition, leading to increased scrutiny of the company's content moderation practices.
   
   On Instagram, for example, users attempting to search for "Democrats" are presented with a message stating "we've hidden these results," with the platform declaring that "results for the term you searched for may contain sensitive content," according to the BBC. Mashable independently verified this issue, confirming that the same message appears whether accessing Instagram via mobile or desktop platforms. The messaging and restrictions appear when users search for either the term itself, or related hashtags.
   
   The hashtag restrictions extend beyond basic terms. TechIssuesToday reports that searches for "#DNC" also return no results, while "#RNC" searches function normally. The site independently verified these restrictions, documenting that searches for both "#Democrat" and "#DNC" trigger the "sensitive content" warning message.
   
   https://www.forbes.com/sites/esatdedeza … instagram/

   replyreport
   1. 100

      DrMark1961posted 71 minutes agoin reply to this

      Yes, you are correct and it is wrong. Why didnt I see anyone from the Dems complaining about this when it was happening to the right though?

      replyreport