It is BS like this that is driving America to the Right. So I say.. "Go Howard and the rest of you Leant Leftists, GO GO GO!
Keep running your mouths with all the hate... you are helping me to collect more partners in my fight to remove you al from our Govt. So you all just go go go!
"The Future Does Not Belong to White Christians Over 55: Howard Dean Slams Tea Party & GOP as Dangerous, Desperate, Religious, Bigoted Haters.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/the-fut … ed-haters/
I do not trust the tea party that much, to blindly head to the far Right just because of Idiots like Dean, so no in my case.
The TEA Party remind's me off a modern version of the Old Joh Burch Society.. And I can see through the political ploy here.
more mis information and hate being spread. Like a Cancer you cant get rid of I think.
Mr. Mason, I didn't read your article, but I agree with the quote. The members of the tea party I have met are dangerous, religious and bigoted. They lack compassion and are selfish and self centered in their politics.
"... you are helping me to collect more partners in my fight to remove you al from our Govt"
So, a Republic to you means one party rule?
btw--nice cutting up of his speech. one minute 22 seconds of stuff they don't like, in a long speech? Not too bad!
AND--what is with that site? Can't read the article without signing up for their e-mail "alerts"?
Sure--send me my daily dose of Democrat Denigrating ....no thanks.
And Dean is right...12% of the population does not get to Lord it over all the rest....no matter how much $$ they have and how many judges they "own".
The judges are the crucial thing, according to Thom Hartmann. He says the next president will most likely choose the next SC Justice.
If Obama is pres---he will choose one who will overturn Citizens United.
If it's Republican--he/she will choose one who will overturn Roe v Wade.--and this includes Ron Paul.
Choice couldn't BE more clear.
All you have to do is CLOSE the e-mail box ad, just like any other site. C'mon chris find a real comliant to spout about. O gee someone watched Rober Riech this mornnig on UCTV.
And yes the 12% of the fanatical Leftists do not get to hoard it over us all, as they have been doing for decades now, "Tyranny By The Minority", has been a leftists ideology for a long time now.
btw--on C-Span right now...that pizza owner candidate....
He has a lot of nerve hi-jacking MLK, when his philosphy couldn't be more different.
Nice use of the race card.
Uh oh--his plan....
No capital gains tax!
Lower corporate tax!
No taxes on foreign profits!
Real payroll tax holiday!
All but the payroll holiday tax...make them permanent!
Oooop, bashing liberals!!
Oh yeah...he's one of them.
sign of the cross held up. NOOOOOOO
Did you watch the presiden of SEIU this morning deny she knew of all the violence you all have committed at the protest so far this year. Most of the calls told her and the Union off for being commie puppets and ruining bussinesses, interesting it was. I especially enjoyed Scalia on the UCTV lecturer this morning, original intent all the way.
I'm beginning to think TM is using this site as his resume for a job with the faux news network. He sure seems to have their brand of fair and balanced mastered, lol.
I watch all the news stations, Fox just happens to cover all side of it in a fairer way. And they are not my favorite, they are a centrist progressive bastion, in case you didn';t know.
Progressive huh? So they are with Soros!!!
and Soros is angwy at Obama...ohhhhhh, the progressives don't like Obama.....does that mean they are with Fox News? Or are there right-wing progressives and left-wing progressives.....? Or are all progressives the same?
From that same site, The Blaze!!:
"billionaire George Soros may be encouraging his fellow progressives to funnel their money away from President Barack Obama — that is, unless Obama can deliver for their cause.
During a small, “private” meeting of the Democracy Alliance Tuesday afternoon, Soros reportedly told the well-funded, progressive-minded crowd that the Obama administration might not be their best investment:
According to multiple sources with knowledge of his remarks, Soros told those in attendance that he is “used to fighting losing battles but doesn’t like to lose without fighting.”
“We have just lost this election, we need to draw a line,” he said, according to several Democratic sources. “And if this president can’t do what we need, it is time to start looking somewhere else."
Hmmmm, and Netroots is mad at him too....
Well, what does this mean?
We KNOW Fox is anti-Obama, but Soros too?
2 wings on the same bird?
Fox news is a Centrist/Progressive station, all the rest of that rambling is yours. And net-roots and the Fanatical Leant Leftists are mad cause he cannot/will not attempt to impliment their agenda by force, he is pandering like all politicians.
Hmmmm, seems to me that he is standing on principle, and is unwilling to be forced by anyone....except the R's in Congress...whom he has to work with, as they Run the House.
Soooo, Beck is a centrist/progressive?
Hannity is a centrist/progressive?
O'Reilly is a centrist/progressive?
Any proof of that? One smidgeon of proof of that?
Sarah Palin is a centrist/progressive?
Carl Rove, Teddy-Boy-Nugent? Oliver North?
You are Buggin!!!
O'Reilly is actually sort of a centrist, but the rest you mentioned definitely aren't. Bill is one of the most arrogant humans on the planet, but he's usually fair. I've seen him take up for the POTUS and the FLOTUS many times, and I've seen him bash birthers.
Oh here we go...You mess with Israel, you mess with us.
Great cheers in the audience.
The blind leading the blind.
Bashing the gvt...."I hate it, but let me in!!"
Change! Change! Change!....errrrr, didn't they make fun of the other side for that?
And what "Change" has the Repub Congress brought?
Back to the future, that's what.
Going baaaaaaack in time, to where the Robber Barons rule.
imo imo imo
and all this time I thought you liked TM, because he was a "Fox-e" kind of guy!!!!! lmao....
this article is nothing but a hatred plant to wrap folks up and keep them from thinking with clear reason. Turn folks away from Obama with seeded hatred.
I agree with the Robber-barron thought, it sure looks like it.
Oh Dutch... thank you for the compliment.
And if your saying, "What compliment?", I am talking about the fact that you and others on here do not agree with me on most things, and that is a hell of a compliment indeed. One of the highest I could be paid.
I am not that far right kind sir, I was just pickin at Chris, she is very passionate to the cause and has real practical points.
In truth, The Blaze, Glenn beck and others like that are ok as a counter to Communism and Radical Socialism, but
we do not have that in Obama at all. If you really slow down and listen to Him, he has some interesting ideas, that are not so off the edge..
The GOP sense the 1980 years has assisted in systematicaly dis assembling the Mid-Class. and now we are in trouble with no jobs no factories and no real markets to sell to.
The GOP can cut till hell freezes, but with no Gross national product worth anything, we will never recover well enough. It is time for a new way to look at things in this world.
TM you are falling into the same mess that The Gov. is falling into now.
An Educated world is waking up to equality, it is not about just demoracy anymore.
"No taxes on foreign profits!"
This one in particular riles me. I just heard a righty-blogger name it: "Re-Patriation"
I KNEW they were going to pull this!
They got tax breaks for moving all the jobs overseas...now they want tax breaks for bringing them back.
Patriotism??? On what planet?
Your inclusion of all people who oppose your views as leftists is rather black/white. It's not realistic, nor true.
As far as Fox news being progressive/centrist? What's the name of that planet?
This is long article, but worth the read.
How Roger Ailes Built the Fox News Fear Factory
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/ne … y-20110525
Actually the only people I consider, "Leant Leftists", are the ones I explained about yesterday.
If you had read my posts you would know that I do not consider all I dis-agree with as Leant Leftists, and that the only people I consider Leant Leftists are any from the Progressives, to the left of the political spectrum from there.
Pretty simple Rebek.
And Rolling Stone is and has always been a leftist rag which has no intellectual value. They ought to have been ashamed of themselves for setting up the General. But no they are heroes in the eyes of the Left. You can keep 'em. Most other News agencies would be "Right" compared to Rolling Stone.
And I wouldn't imagine they would seem Progressive/Centrist to someone steeped in the Left, but to us true Conservatives, we can see the truth, and we know they are there to lure the Right to the Center. "Compromise" is their battle cry... and "NO COMPROMISE" is ours. And we will not compromise anymore with the Leftists, they have always got their way and we are done with it.
It is the way of the game the Leftists/Progressives have been playing for for a century. They write both sides of the script, play both sides of the field... and point at one another to get us to pick one side or the other, which are both the same side in reality.... and America sees it these days, we know what they are all about.
I do read some of your posts, and yet they basically say the same thing. You say, no compromise? I don't get that. Life is compromise. Policies have to change over time. We're not the same country as our founding fathers found, nor should we be. Those attempting to take us back over 200 years are lost in the past.
I and many others don't consider it a rag, it leans to the left, but doesn't fail to criticize the left either. Have you read their articles?
The article about the General.. so who else would have written it?
Why do we think our Generals are without excuse? It was good to see him replaced. War is fatiguing. He had lost vision.
All he had done was critisize Obama. And yes I have read Rolling Stone on many occassions. Spin it however you want, they are set-up artists, like you all claim Andrew Brietbart is.
And the Constitution is our founding document and will not be replaced, no matter how bad the left wants to tear it up. And it is the greatest document of social contracts ever penned, and is quite capable and perfectly exceptable for todays world.
And yes war is fatiguing, and to set up a General who has sreved his entire career with distinction, and then claim he deserved it because he was tired, fitigued, and "lost vision", is absurd.
"the Constitution is our founding document and will not be replaced, no matter how bad the left wants to tear it up. And it is the greatest document of social contracts ever penned, and is quite capable and perfectly exceptable for todays world."
You're right; both the left and the right love to make exceptions.
"Inside America's Unfair and Imbalanced Network"
"Your inclusion of all people who oppose your views as leftists is rather black/white. It's not realistic, nor true. "
I'm glad I'm not the only one who sees this.
"Soooo, Beck is a centrist/progressive?
Hannity is a centrist/progressive?
O'Reilly is a centrist/progressive?
Any proof of that? One smidgeon of proof of that?
Sarah Palin is a centrist/progressive?
Carl Rove, Teddy-Boy-Nugent? Oliver North?"
Actually Beck is no longer with them as of the end of this month... and why do you think that is?... Cause he won't play their game. No he isn't, he is an Indepedent, just as he says.
I think it's more to do with this:
"many advertisers have not wanted to associate themselves with the lightning rod host. A source previously told the Daily News that the total number of companies that have refused to run ads on Beck's show is approaching 400."
This is after all....Crapitalism!!! The very system he glorifies has done him in.
You could be right though...
Olbermann said he left MSNBC because he was beginning to feel stifled.
It's just that I never noticed Fox stopping Beck from saying ANYTHING...and I mean ANYTHING.
I'm pretty sure if Keith had simulated pouring gasoline down Palin's throat--he would have been outta there!! No questions asked.
Beck is a narcissist and a demagogue. He found a great way to make money, and the radical right was only too happy to hand it to him.
Beck simply saw what was happening, and how the Progressive Right and Leftists and the Media was involved, and decided that maybe someone should out it all, and them.
This is nothing new... the Left has been betraying us for a century with the Progressives and the Media. Only now, we all see you.
Exactly - just like he used to do with the far left. I'm so glad his show is going off the air!
Palin didn't get the Gov-ship of Alaska from the Progressives without playing thier game. And we are not giong to play it anymore. And I have said over and over she is a plant, and playing her own games. She knows the money is in running interferance for the Right-wing, so she is doing it.
I am not one who thinks she is a Conservative. I believe she might become one if she thinks it will work better for her, but not one in truth.
Carl Rove, is a Progressive like Bush.
And Ted Nugent is a guest, on Progressive Huckabee's show, nothing more.
And Hannity is a flip flopper, claiming to be Conservative, and supporting Progressives. So take a guess what he is.. alot of Progressives claim to be Conservative, and they are as compared to the leftists further over, but not in truth.
O'rielly is a centrist, who is slowly leaning a lil more Right all the time, becuase he actually looks at what Beck says and cannot deny it. So it is working its way into his understanding. But stii he has an issue accepting it.
And all the commies and Socialists the American Left is tied to and you think we care what you all think of us... huh yeah right. American Leant leftist Commie lovers is what the Left has been and now they are seen for it.
Actually TM, if anything or anybody is luring the right to the centre it is you!
Most do not want the sort of one party state that you seem to strive for.
Actually john, most Americans are tired of the one party system we have been in for the last century. As I said keep up the hate... I will be there wiating for the wanderers. Conservatism has been re-born and is even now kikin and screaming as it grows in strength and maturity once more.
Welcome back America!!
But I don't constantly post rants about the right do I?
Me thinks you are trying to redefine hate along with everything else you try to redefine to suit your own weird image.
There is nothing hateful about John's reply. Nothing.
Is hate the new buzz-word?
I did not say his reply was hateful. I said keep up the hate as a general reply to his assertion that I, and not the left was pushing America one way or the other.
You understand now? Comprehension and context, Chris. lol
Where is the hate in stating the bleeding obvious?
Very few people actually desire a one party state, left or right, but you do, don't you.
And here we go again, you were following the conversation, so no excuse for your not knowing.
You surely mean "acceptable" "exceptable" means the opposite, or do you secretly agree that it is suitable for exception?
His entire career with distinction? hmm, what about the cover up of Tillman's death? the torture and abuse at Camp Nama? all of the innocent civilian casualties? speaking to reporters in the first place? Perhaps one of his bigger mistakes was his own lack of professional judgment in speaking candidly to reporters in a kvetching, exposure hungry, media- crazed world. I don't see that as a set up. He knew he was 'stepping' over military boundaries.
One of his best ideas is the public/private sectors teaming up and working together.
They did something really cool in the west....something to do with cattle ranchers and a fed program...it was a long time ago I read it...
And gardens in buildings...on top of roofs. Has many benefits!
GREEN energy!! We are missing the boat!
Kids doing service...no it's not Nazi tyranny. It's working together.
Better food in schools...hello. Fresh veggies and fruit is communism?
The sense I get from him is us all working together for a better world.
And LOT of people do not want that at all......it cuts into their profit and their monopolized power.
As George Harrison sang: "All l can hear, I me mine, I me mine, I me mine. Even those tears, I me mine, I me mine, I me mine...."
know what! screw this Southern democrate; IE Republican in disquise garbage. It is time too use my stuff from my world travels and World bank Job. Time to say some truths here. If I break my security clearence no tell period, so the H what!
I am going Obama. The more I think this out, study facts not hype, I think I am correct. My Grandparents built the Bridges in this country, they cam from Europe, made a middle class.
I remember being in a working class Union family all my days in Providence R.I. and to deny that is nuts. We were not rich but we had life and place and purpose.
The GOP has systematicaly destroyed jobs, wages, markets all in the name of Capitalists Survival, with stock market rape and run ideals. and Job Give aways for some promise of return from some underhanded Overseas deals. We have been sold off!
Unions gave us the 40 hour work week, no child labor, and fair wage for fair work.
As for Middle East? The real desire in the Mid East is Equality, noting about American style Goverment. I have seen that openly and in person. and The US does not want it at all. They are interfearing with it in covert ways, for the Oil and Bank dollar trade.
All hiden behind Biblical premise of Protection!
I have always done well under a Democratic president, and will also under Obama.
The more I look at this crapola, the more obvious it becomes.
Destroy what will to hold power, but not before we rape the bank and run off, legaly. Spin it as saving the world, and hope no one catches on.
This is a hidden guise for Capitalist Control, a corporate state not a free nation plan. Nope, This GOP can get lost, I just woke up! It is time to write!
"Massive sell-off lists of public property are now being drawn up by the governments of Portugal, Spain, Italy, and Ireland. In the United States, there are calls for the privatization of the US Postal Service, Social Security, and Medicare."
We don't have a whole lot of time here...
Not forgetting the UK LMC, where the government is intent on selling the few remaining public assets for private profit.
Fortunately, their plans to sell off the NHS have met with rather more resistance than they expected and caused them to back pedal frantically.
I'm not quite so hopeful for Royal Mail, there are too many richard heads around who say "who needs Royal Mail, we've got the internet" Fat lot of use that is for deliveries! We've also suffered with governments passing off more profitable aspects of the business to private companies.
Funny, I have not seen any benefit from any previous privatisations, in fact just the opposite. I pay much more for gas and electricity, deregulated public transport is no longer a cheap option, it's more like an expensive luxury, though not very luxurious! Talking about public transport, now our railways are part owned by the German state railways, that amuses me greatly.
It great, all these public services sold into private hands, but guess who picks up the bill for all the unemployed? Why we, the tax payers do.
Yeah--and who makes a profit?
It happened in Argentina in the 90's, and the global industrialists, IMF, HW Bush et al, had their hands all over it.
That is why they don't like Chavez, because he would not succumb to them. And the president of Bolivia...although I don't know the current situation with them....
And Uninvited Writer said the same thing once about Canada...privitizing only causes costs to go up.
Not only that...they just don't CARE about people! The only thing they see is money....How to get more of it.No matter WHAT the cost.
They need a reality check. And so do we.
No Chris we do not have a lot of time. You are right
by OLYHOOCH 7 years ago
Human Events’ readers, in an online poll, recently voted billionaire financier George Soros “the single most destructive leftist demagogue in the country.” Here are the Top 10 Reasons George Soros Is Dangerous:1. Gives billions to left-wing causes: Soros started the Open...
by TeaPartyCrasher 7 years ago
In light of the decision to let the Bush-era tax cuts for the wealthy continue, and the criticism from Obama of those progressives opposed to letting them continue, perhaps Obama needs a reminder of who got him where he is. I think a challenge in 2012 from the likes of Russ Feingold, Alan Grayson,...
by Dr Billy Kidd 4 years ago
Tea Party activists in the House of Representatives want to shut down the U.S. government. They say it'll teach America who really is in charge. What's more, they say that not passing a federal budget by the Oct. 1 deadline will cut government back to the levels imagined by the founding...
by TMMason 7 years ago
This is the problem with trusting progressives on the Right. You people better figure it out, to elect a Progressive is to leave Obama and his ilk in.What is Agenda 21? If you do not know about it, you should.Agenda 21 is a two-decade old, grand plan for global ’Sustainable Development,’...
by G. Diane Nelson Trotter 5 months ago
Will there be a tipping point? Lying on a daily basis is ok? campaign corruption is ok? Pursuit of own interest above the citizens is ok? What if Cohen proves colllustion with Russia through his Prague visit? What if there is irrefutable evidence to support these...
by Jack Lee 13 months ago
It has been almost a year since he left office. Though he seems to stick around DC and make his comments occasionally about policies...The question I have for all is this - what is your opinion of this President in his 8 years in office...?Overall, has he been good or bad for America?Please use...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|