Recently, images are being added to cigarette packaging.
http://www.cbsnews.com/2300-204_162-100 … =page;next
It won't work.
Just thought I'd point out this complete waste of taxpayer money.
Is the taxpayer even paying for this or is it the cigarette companies?
Even if the companies pay for it - how much money did the FDA blow trying to get the labels put on / designing them?
I agree with Evan. If the tobacco companies paid for this the cost will be passed on to the consumer.
It might work. Since the frequency of smoking is already going down steadily, who knows, it might give it an extra boost
This is very similar to the packaging in Australia, so I imagine there are statistics on its effectiveness Down Under. I wonder what the results are?
Even if you put an image of a dead person bec of smoking or one dying of cancer in the cigarette pack, it wont deter some to smoke, it is an addiction. The reason they are able to look at the image/photo is they are holding the cigarette pack already, LOL
Smoking is dropping in most demographics (both percentage and frequency), so something is working.
I am a smoker, five a day for thirty years.
I consider it a relaxant and health aid.
I don't think it's coming out of taxpayers pockets. But it will come out of smokers' wallets since I'm sure the cigarette companies will past the cost on to them.
Plus I don't think the new packaging will inspire smokers to quit. Parts of Asia has had these types of cigarette packages for ages and it has not changed the minds of smokers.
The FDA did have to design and agree to put these on the packaging - the taxpayers DID pay for some of it.
Shucks yeah, that dirty ole government interfering with big businesses right to kill people!
By this point, everyone knows that cigs are bad for you.
And if they don't, it's because they can't.
But if you are addicted it is easy to "forget" a constant reminder does work.
People do not care until it hits hard. My husband could not quit until he got really ill, and I mean it - seriously ill.
Hardly a huge amount I suspect. More like a bit of time from a person already on salary.
It does not matter what anyone does, if someone wants to smoke, they are going to smoke.
There is certain amount of stupidity in most of us, I cannot find a better world for that,that ability to ignore facts, to ignore danger, disaster in our life and just continue that "I-am-going-to-do-it-because-I-like-it-and-do-not-give-a-damn attitude that allows even very smart people ruin their lives over stupid things like smoking,drinking and drugs.
Well I was thinking yesterday, they like people smoking because they are getting your tax money. Only marijuana is illegal, yet smoking is and our government is literally making money off of us killing us by legalizing smoking! lol I am a smoker, but so nice to know my government has my health in mind, when they illegalize other substances, but than the biggest addictions they make money off of is Alcohol, and tobacco. They like their money, and don't mind killing people in the process!
In the book Brandology this specific example (images as a deterrent on cigarettes) was studied. Their findings were that the images had no negative effect on buying impulse and in fact spurred the danger seeking/rebel impulse.
I lived in Buffalo for quite awhile, Canada has had these images for years, my canadian friends would order their cigarettes and the clerk would ask if they had a preference...
"you want the Players with the fetus or the lungs?'
I think the whole point is that the total cost of smoking *should* be passed to the consumer rather than partially carried by the general taxpayer. That is why tobacco tax goes mainly into healthcare.
Despite the assertion made here, packaging does sometime effect what smokers know, and reduce population wide smoking rates.
http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/1 … ii19.short
http://journals.lww.com/jphmp/Abstract/ … ng.11.aspx
http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/1 … /i32.short
Link1: Study is about awareness of health risks in relation to smoking and has no bearing on whether health risks illustrated effects buying.
Link2: Requires subscription - but from abstract" "Of those policies, substantial evidence indicates that higher taxes and clean air laws can have a large impact on smoking rates."
again, nothing about packaging.
Link3: Joe Camels influence on Youth smokers (again, no correlation to negative buying influence)
Your links in no way support your statement - what were they the top 3 returns in a google search? Did you even read them?
I dont think neuroscience is necessarily considered authoritative yet.
But, here is a link of interest in relation to the study I referenced
http://www.neurosciencemarketing.com/bl … rnings.htm
The abstract is a review paper covering dozena of studies some of which show decreases in population wide decreases and some don't--suggesting that how you do it is important.
And yes, I googled it, which is one step more than just making it up. I couldn't be bothered digging out my lecture notes from industrial psychology which suggested cost is most effective, no smoking zones second and packaging third.
The other examples were to show that packing in general changes what people know about tobacco and it can make them smoke more (so why not less).
Something is a waste of money of it doesn't work. It is lazy to just assume this is true unquestioningly because you like to bitch about how stupid people are--quite the self-fulfilling prophecy.
Perhaps a study about those who stopped smoking can be conducted. This is just my hypothesis : for those who stopped smoking, a big factor in the decision to stop is a real life close experience, like a death of a loved one from smoking related diseases.
As a sidenote, I read that this risk behavior is transferred, a youth who grow up in a home with a smoking adult will likely develop the habit, so a more solid campaign for a value transformation is needed, strengthening of family values, which is difficult.
by lady_love158 9 years ago
What more does it take to make you stubborn progressives (like President Obama) come to your senses?
by sandra rinck 9 years ago
So I was looking over my electronic cigarette hubs today and all the amazon links for e-cigs were gone. So I went to amazon to look for some others and guess what? No electronic cigarettes for sale anymore. That just really frustrates me. Someone finally comes up with a good...
by ahorseback 16 months ago
CNN didn't place one show in the top twenty five shows this quarter ?But , Oh NOooooooo CNN dosen't have a problem with viewership ....... does it ?Sorry , We've all been trying to tell you so . Payback ?
by Stacie L 8 years ago
The 10 States Most Addicted to SmokingAntismoking efforts are hard to avoid nowadays. Cigarette packaging will get graphic new warning labels in 2012, and 38 states have at least some restrictions as to where a person can light up. (New York State has even banned smoking in public parks.) But...
by Evan G Rogers 8 years ago
Hey all, Here's an article from my hero, Ron Paul. He talks about the fight that the Fed put up against Bloomburg to get the basic information of "Who did you pay, and how much did you pay?" revealed to the public.http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul731.html
by Jackilyn 12 years ago
Is it just me or people starting to smoke more ? When I'm driving to a store I'll see about 15 people smoke and when i'm on the freeway I'll see about 20 people . Has it been like this for awhile and I'm just noticing it or is smoking coming back that way people can lose weight ?
Copyright © 2020 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|