"Monopolies and near monopolies have always been a source of economic power—from John D. Rockefeller at the beginning of the last century to Bill Gates at the end. Lax enforcement of anti-trust laws, especially during Republican administrations, has been a godsend to the top 1 percent. Much of today’s inequality is due to manipulation of the financial system, enabled by changes in the rules that have been bought and paid for by the financial industry itself—one of its best investments ever. The government lent money to financial institutions at close to 0 percent interest and provided generous bailouts on favorable terms when all else failed. Regulators turned a blind eye to a lack of transparency and to conflicts of interest."
Nice,deregulation is BS and trickle down doesn't work,
here's the rest:
http://www.vanityfair.com/society/featu … ntPage=all
No bad monopoly has ever been created without help of the government.
Your anger should be directed at the government and regulation, not the free-market.
Of course this theory ignores all anti-trust regulation and the abuses that regulation has curbed.
Unfortunately, anti-trust enforcement is non-existent.
What's that? No example of a monopoly doing wrong without help from the government?
No bad monopoly has ever been created without the help of money. Your anger should be directed at money...
Your logic is consistent if nothing else.
"The frog does not drink up the pond in which it lives"
The frog is smart enough to know he needs that pond to survive too.
GE laid off 21,000 American workers and closed 20 US factories between 2007 and 2009. More than half of GE's workforce is now outside of the United States.
GE paid no US tax in 2010.
Giving outrageous tax breaks to GE boosted their profits but that didn't seem to translate into US jobs or in any improvement in the US economy. An increase in the DOW didn't help the unemployment situation either.
Why reward companies for moving offshore and giving unreasonable bonuses to the CEOs who promoted this?
Without proper regulation, trickle down stops in the executive suite.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/general- … d=13224558
Trickle down doesn't/never worked,
http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the … ide_coffin
The upper 1% doesn't live the same life as the rest of society, because creation of wealth has given them influence and power, due to lack of character of the existing political system in place.
Those who are in the political system fail on every level of character, as an individual. None of them represent society, but present themselves for benefits from society, while protecting corporate profits.
As I have said before and will gladly say again- "Corporate Protectionism" by government continues to be the status quo, which needs to be broken.
If it is not broken soon, then a host of other problems are only going to get worse, instead of better.
by WorldCup~2010 7 years ago
We are talking about Wal-Mart at school right now and there are two sides to this story. The bad side is how Wal-Mart is moving all of their manufacturing jobs over seas which ends up having a negative effect here in America. But also, Americans are getting rock bottom prices on most goods Wal-Mart...
by Paul Goodman 6 years ago
Link to the Guardian's article on investigation of Google's monopoly:http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/20 … oly-senateDon't get me wrong, I have a great respect for many of Google's products, including their search engine, and they have a right to compete with and outdo their rivals, but...
by Moderndayslave 6 years ago
With the income gap between the wealthiest American's and the soon to be decimated middle or working class ever increasing. How much more proof do you need that tax cuts for the wealthy isn't creating jobs or supplying wages that are holding their own against inflation....
by Deforest 3 years ago
poor" by Gore Vidal. He added that the rich are living off the federal government (contracts and tax breaks...).I definitively agree with him. Your opinion?
by rhamson 8 years ago
The topic of trade deficit spending always brings with it the lost jobs in the US. The race to the bottom sends more and more jobs overseas with the demand for profits and growth by companies in the US. To compete with these overseas job markets are we just trading our standard of living for...
by ptosis 9 months ago
yea or nea? Are you HAPPY! that the richest .01% get less taxes? I mean - they did earn it didn't they?Do they just work harder? Is everybody else just stupid and lazy? Hard work will only get you so far if circumstances aren’t amenable. Do you believe that “If you’re still poor at 35, you...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|