It seems to be a common practice in China and the developing world to abort female babies because male babies are preferred and bringing up children is expensive. Women are calling this gendercide. Immigrants from India, Pakistan, China etc. are also aborting female children here in the US and already in the UK. Now there are activists in the UK who think that the government should crack down on doctors and clinics who help couples to commit gendercide. So should the State command people not to selectively abort and put people in jail who do and those who aid and abet them?
And couldn't this be the beginning of a slippery slope, if there was a gene found that accurately predicted that the baby is a homosexual, and couples don't want a homosexual baby, should the State step in and allow abortion? It's not far from only accepting babies that have the desired features.
For those who think that babies are not being aborted, this should not concern you since it's just a collection of cells, so you don't have to comment.
Seems as unjustified as many other reasons.
When you talk about desired features, it call up the selection of babies with downs syndrome for abortions. If this selection, or a selection for any other medical issue, is acceptable, then abortion for any selected feature is acceptable.
Anyhow, this is not the beginning of the slippery slope. The fact is that the justification for the abortion is in the hands of the woman holfding the child. 'I don't want a child.' looks the same to me as 'I don't want this child.' A life is ending and one reason isn't any dirtier than another.
While I mourn for the stunted population growth, all the missing scientists developing the cure for this and that, friends, etc, my heart is still conflicted. It is acceptable to me for someone to select a child with downs syndrome for an abortion. In my mind, this is still more acceptable than someone commiting gendercide, which contradicts my earlier statements somewhat.
China has forced abortions.
Some people here want us to have forced birth.
Either way--it's gvt force.
OMG!! Talk about kismet!!
by Miss Info6 years ago
I was chatting with a friend, Sam, the other day. He is openly gay, insists that he is a traditional Orthodox Jew and is very adamant about his “rights”. He believed that “people should be able to live however...
by Grace Marguerite Williams4 years ago
According to Huffington Post and Reuters, the Kansas House of Representatives passed a bill on Friday, April 5, 2013 on a 90/30 vote declaring that "life" now begins at fertilization. This is after the...
by Tom Cornett7 years ago
Because.....If liberal progressives are for abortion and gay marriage, then it makes sense that mostly progressive liberals will most often enact those rights...far more than conservatives.Which means...there will be...
by Judy Specht4 years ago
The president has talked up abortion as a safe choice. Kermit Gosnell has just been indited for 1st degree murder of 3 aborted babies that were killed after they were born alive. He was indited for...
by theirishobserver.7 years ago
We have been told time and again that unborn babies under 24 weeks have no chance of survival and so the legal limit in the UK for killing an unborn child is 24 weeks - however - we know from the story below that the 24...
by Asa Schneidermann2 years ago
Before, it was all kind of fuzzy. We knew that abortions took place in Planned Parenthood facilities and fought against it, but other activities were unclear. Now, we have clear, undeniable evidence of the evil - and I...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.