Companies like Shell and Exxon operate on a 7% profit margin. This currently means we are paying them approximately $0.25/gallon of gas. Yet, many people call outrage that they charge such high profits as 7%.
Insurance companies operate on a 4% profit margin, but they are blamed for the high costs of health care.
Hmm, what about Apple? Apple runs a 28% profit margin! Maybe we are mad at the wrong industries.
Interestingly enough, the Post Office runs on a -7.6% profit margin... government efficiency at its best.
The price point on Apple products is so high because there are a very large number of people who will pay it. The backlash for Apple's prices is minimal because it's viewed more as a want than a need. Other companies who compete with Apple, such as Amazon and BlackBerry, sell considerably cheaper products that do similar things, but a very large number of people don't care and want the Apple product bad enough to pay the higher price. There's nothing wrong in that. With regard to your Exxon example, they could hike their prices, and the people who are loyal to Exxon or think Exxon offers a superior product may continue to pay those higher prices, but I suspect the vast majority of the people will purchase their oil-based products from someone other than Exxon or who doesn't purchase oil from Exxon. Further, I don't understand why you'd be mad at either of these companies. If you don't like their prices, don't buy their product.
The whole post is tongue-in-cheek to a degree, I don't think it makes sense for anybody to be mad at the oil companies for the price of gas, as they contribute so little to the high prices.
The Apple example is just to show that profit isn't necessarily an evil thing, and companies should be allowed to charge what they want for their products.
I was hoping some of the big-business haters might take a new look at how the free-market operates, and who they should really be angry at.
Cool. Without knowing it was tongue-in-cheek, the whole post just seemed so weird to me, lol, as I'm more on your side of the fence. Just to throw another example out there, it's similar to people getting angry about athletes making obscene salaries. They get that kind of money because people spend so much on those products, going to the games and so on, and because TV stations are willing to shell out huge dollars to broadcast the games. If it doesn't go to the athletes it will just get filtered to someone else in the organization -- probably the owners. If people think Apple is making too much money, they don't have to buy its products, and if people don't like athletes making mountains of money, they don't have to support the teams.
Profits guide the hand to build what is required by society.
People look to the market, see profits in some sectors, and realize that they can safely build a production change in such sectors. Then profits reduce as competition increases.
IF the oil companies make 7%, and people think it is too high, then they should start their own oil companies and break the margin.
If they can't do this, or they refuse, then they are just blowhards who want government to restrict freedom.
This is how the road to serfdom begins: a failure to understand economics.
by JaxsonRaine 6 years ago
Alright, I'm tired of debating healthcare. I'm just going to give some information for everyone.The US leads the world in obesity rates, and obese people pay $1,500+ per year more than non-obese.The US leads(or nearly) the world in diabetes rates. Diabetics spend 2.3 times as much on healthcare...
by kerryg 8 years ago
Go ahead, boycott BP. Not only do you get to send a message to the company that has proved incapable of stopping the undersea gusher unleashed on April 20, but (unless you live in a one-gas-station town) you can do it without much pain to yourself.Drive right on by the BP station and pull up to the...
by Gary Anderson 6 years ago
Worried about the price of gas? Our oil companies aren't. They export oil in the SF Bay and in April will start exporting West Texas Intermediate (WTI) from the Gulf of Mexico. http://www.businessinsider.com/the-asto … rum-2012-3Here is my response. We can thank libertarian thought for the...
by Harvey Stelman 8 years ago
I voted Democratic because I believe oil companies' profits of 4% on a gallon of gas are obscene but the government taxing the same gallon of gas at 15% isn't.
by Brian 7 years ago
This may not be news to a whole lot of people, but, I am getting sick of this. Why isn't the Government doing anything about it, especially when they know that it is killing our economy? Not, to mention that we are fighting wars over it, only to have the countries we are "Aiding" are...
by flacoinohio 5 years ago
What do you think about oil companies lowering the price of gas just before a Presidential election?There was a small statement made by Mitt Romney about the price of gasoline being $4.00 a gallon during the second Presidential debate last evening. The price of gas in our area dropped 20...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|