|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
There would be no wars. Just a bunch of jealous countries not talking to each other
You mean men are not jealous or what?
There are so many women who lead countries.. do they not talk to each other... ? I am a little slow maybe... your questions has me all confused..
the hungry, thirsty and sick people of the world would be taken care of first. Wars would be off the table and there'd be compromise not death to those who disagree...
There would be a bunch of jealous countries...swearing not to see each other again....
Wasn't expecting that...
Hmm, or maybe all the countries would be civil in person and talk bad about each other behind their backs? Am I doing it right?
Shoes Plus handbags will be the two currencies. All the alleys, sidewalks and roads will be colorful.
Honestly its going to be good, there would be love, mercy peace.Just that make-ups would take the lead everywhere. Smile!
The world would look more like Bangladesh..poor & hopeless
Behind every great leader there already is a woman in control!!!!!!
No wars. Rubbish. A country would be nuked every 28 days, or that's what I heard anyway.
Well, for one thing, there would be no testosterone in charge and that would be a definite plus. But it would also have a downside. That testosterone that fires up men to fight, is also creative energy that would get things done. As long as women stayed in control and directed the testosterone, it would be a great world. Yes, there are women who act like men, but for the most part, women have been very successful as leaders. If they ruled the world, we might have a chance to survive. If men continue, we will keep fighting until we have destroyed each other.
It really probably wouldn't be that much different. I think the situations would still be the same, but it would differ because of how females and males handle things. Both handle things differently.
Females are more known for being over emotional and overly caring, but that isn't nessicarily true or the case. I think that is an old stereo type which many people still haven't let go of. Men and women are just as capable of making the same decisions when leading countries, as with anything else. The people 'leading' some countries are for the most part just figure heads anyway, so in actuallity there would be no difference(Except for countries with different political systems, like dictatorships). Women still may try to help people more, concentrating probably more on health care and rights as well as more individual things, but that would probably be the only difference.
Women already do rule the world. They even got to pass on all the accountability to men.
I guess you mean what if women ruled the handful of countries that appear to run the world. More and more women get elected/appointed into positions of power every year. I think the results are obvious enough if you know where to look. Just an example from my own experience. When I was in high school twenty years back, I was passionately opposed to the death penalty and to nuclear weapons. This was considered by many to be overly idealistic, fringe political views at the time. I still hold the same views on both issues but I feel both viewpoints have become significantly more mainstream. I definitely feel that the overall dominance of the male perspective is generally lessening and it is beginning to show in government among other places especially in this century.
Trust me to be the cynic. But, women are just as fallible as men, IMHO. Having said that, if all women existed in a society where they were allowed to prosper, share ideas and challenge the "norms" which have been put in place by men, without fear and hindrance. Then yeah, they'd do an absolutely brilliant job, IMHO.
If women ruled the world, then men would be compelled to wear jock straps, wear aftershave at all times and shave off all of our body hair.
Yeah, they'd probably go further and force us to wear pink shirts and white trousers. Maybe we'd have to carry handbags as well <shudder>
and don't forget... all toilet seats would be down!
I believe we do rule the World already! If we did not exist man would not exist.
I could not imagine seeing a man giving birth, its funny enough when they freak out over a needle. lol!
Love our men but we as women do Rule The World.
Nor do I see one woman fertilizing another.
If I were a woman, I surely would not admit to ruling the world, as it is for the most part in sorry shape. I would blame men for screwing it up.
For me, I believe we should rule together, hand in hand, with common goals and a willingness to share.
But what do I know, I'm just a man!
Hasn't anyone ever seen "Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus"? Men are highly competitive and territorial by nature. It's part of survival. When they need time alone they go into their caves.
Women communicate with each other. That's why we always want to 'talk it out' while the men at the other end of the rubber band are pulling away and saying 'I thought we just did that."
So instead of war, we'd be talking each other to death. When the confrontations finally reach an emotional head, we'd cry, then hug each other and go on with our business. No sending our kids to kill each other.
I'm sure it's not as simple as that. The first thing I'd do as president is ban anything higher than 2" heels as unsafe.
If women ruled the world, the world would make a whole lot, whole lot, much more whole lot . . . of sense.
Stay at home moms would get paid:)Imagine if all moms stayed home and raised their children what a different world it would be.
@ts what do u mean by IF?....it already is....some men think that they call the shots but in end it is women who rules be it be in family or nation...
I believe there'd be much more peace throughout this world, less poverty, and many, many more things that need to be improved upon.
Unless Kim Kardashian becomes president of the United States... of course.
by Seiboi Misao23 months ago
Do you agree with the view that men ruled the world but women ruled the men?
by Gadfly11 months ago
What would it be like if Women ruled the world?This question was posed on a morning television programme recently and the response was over whelming.
by ngureco5 years ago
Which are the Countries with More Women than Men?
by CCahill6 months ago
Does Evening Primrose Oil (EPO) Raise OR Lower Testosterone levels in Men?
by Tijani Achamlal21 months ago
Why on earth do you think 60 year old wrinkly fat bald men get 21 year old girls?Even if it were “natural,” there’s nothing innocent or harmless or healthy about older men pursuing ceaselessly younger women. The...
by Nare Gevorgyan5 years ago
What will happen to the World when Mitt Romney becomes president?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.