jump to last post 1-5 of 5 discussions (10 posts)

Atheists, what would constitute as reliable evidence that God exists?

  1. rgeter profile image58
    rgeterposted 5 years ago

    Atheists, what would constitute as reliable evidence that God exists?

  2. profile image0
    JThomp42posted 5 years ago

    Just look around at the beauty he created. The world and the living on it had to have been created. If it was the bi bang "Theory" the earth would be a pile of rubble.

  3. rgeter profile image58
    rgeterposted 5 years ago

    ChristinS- I agree that the spiritual and scientific gap can be bridged and the more we discover the more it is. It is noteworthy that not all believers are against science we just think science compliments our belief. I also agree that the entity should make himself known to the masses. Now someone like myself (who is a believer) would say that God did reveal Himself to the people in the form of Jesus. But the people, not everyone rejected Him. Now looking at all of the archeological evidence outside of the bible that support not only the existence of Jesus, but who He was to the people as well as all of the manuscripts found that match the content of the bible we have today is that not enough evidence to go off of?

    1. profile image0
      JThomp42posted 5 years agoin reply to this

      AMEN rgeter!!

    2. ChristinS profile image96
      ChristinSposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      point to any valid scientific evidence that Jesus was the direct descendent of a diety and not Joseph.  Also, provide direct evidence of scientific proof of biblical studies.  Many stories from the bible are myths that were shared among other culture

  4. ChristinS profile image96
    ChristinSposted 5 years ago

    funny my original answer isn't posted anymore? wow - so much for discussion and open minds lol you post your answer and then delete my original one I'm done with this conversation.  Typically the premise of asking a question is to get answers is it not?

    1. rgeter profile image58
      rgeterposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Hey the deletion of your comment was not purposeful, but accidental. Sorry about that.

  5. junkseller profile image83
    junksellerposted 5 years ago

    Impossible. You can not ask someone who believes in observable evidence to believe in the unobservable. Even if there is archaeological evidence that Jesus lived, that isn't proof he is the son of God or that God exists. It simply means some dude named Jesus once lived. If a cosmically powerful being appeared on Earth and could snap their fingers and make amazing things happen, you might call them God, I would just call them a cosmically powerful being. Nothing more, nothing less.

    1. rgeter profile image58
      rgeterposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      I would be reluctant personally as science has been wrong about things. No one has experienced nor can we measure infinity yet the term exists to describe something that surpasses the finite. Why create the term unless something could fit the mold?

    2. junkseller profile image83
      junksellerposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      And no one ever WILL experience infinity. It is always the thing beyond our grasp, no matter how far we reach. If someone did grab it, it would no longer be infinity. If you can hold it in your hand, it isn't God.

 
working