Why are the two mutually exclusive? Is there really no third choice? Can't it be both?
In my opinion they can. I contend, and I may be a minority of one, that evolution is the plan designed by God to governed the development of creationism. In other words, when God created the universe, he laid out a road map for the future and we named that road map evolution.
My visceral response is evolution. However, an answer truer to my feelings/conclusions on the comparison is more nuanced. Where religion gets extremist and militantly rebukes natural selection in favor of some magical "things are because that's how He designed it/"the way they're supposed to be", I either ignore it or fume in disgust. Similarly, when your rock-rigid scientists (and those so oriented) hear the word "rellgion" and shut their ears off and go "la la laa...I can't HEEEEEAR yoooou!!", before considering any logical or phenomenal way in which the two can co-exist, their credibility wrt considering ALL data and/or analyses takes quite the hit as well. So, the "this or that" format of the question is itself something with which I have a bit of a problem.
Many (all?) biblical literalists interpret the timeline in Genesis to give us a very young age to Earth. These Young Earth Creationists feel that the universe and Earth are between 6000 and 12000 years old. But that's only one interpretation of the Bible.
Science gives us a far older universe and Earth. Though science is not right on everything all of the time, they are right so much of the time that we have to consider their input.
If the Bible is right, it would match reality. Science studies reality and has done an excellent job of it. Just look at our technological society. To ignore reality is to court delusion. Therefore, if the Bible does not seem to match science, then it is possible that either science is wrong or that the interpretation of the Bible is wrong. Notice, I said that "interpretation" is wrong, not the Bible.
In science's favor is the fact that so many different sources within science give us an old universe. It seems more likely that the one interpretation would be wrong when stacked against hundreds (thousands?) of scientific observations.
The biblical literalist thinks their interpretation is right, but in the search for truth, humility is required. Holding onto one's own interpretation can be the antithesis of humility.
I have found a different interpretation of Genesis that yields a biblical timeline compatible with those of science. In fact, it explains a lot of the apparent enigmas found in Genesis like,
* The seemingly outrageous longevity of the early patriarchs.
* The fact that the addition of all those years comes up far short of the reality found by science.
* The reason why God gave seemingly unjustified protection of a murderer and a liar (Cain and later, his descendant Lamech).
* The identity of the elusive "daughters of men" found in Genesis 6.
* The reason behind the Great Flood of Noah.
* The existence of the Kabbalists' "Tree of Life" matrix embedded in 2 chapters of Genesis.
What is startling about this new timeline is that it gives an age of humanity far older than the current minimum age found by scientists. In other words, they have many more bones to discover before they get the true age of humanity. But that new biblical age of humans seems to show that, though everything else evolved slowly, Homo sapiens may well have been created or engineered in an epoch when giants roamed the Earth
Both and "Salvation".................................................
by Csaba Bebesai 5 years ago
Did it happen, I mean, seriously? What if a God just dropped us here from the space? Or we just came out of thin air? Why Evolution?
by AKA Winston 7 years ago
Someone else asked the question: Do Christians accept evolution, and it occured to me that whether or not evolution accepts Christians would be the more relevant question. Will natural selection eliminate those too rigid in their beliefs to adapt?
by thetruthhurts2009 8 years ago
If evolution were true how do you explain homosexuality? If we are just here to past on our genes, doesn't homosexuality seem like a defect? If you're a evolutionist it does. You see what kind of problems the evolutionary mindset has on society? Blacks and Jews are not evolved enough(racism), gays...
by aka-dj 7 years ago
I just posted the below in another thread, but, because it can get lost within all the other posts, I decided to repeat it in it's own new thread.Here it is:I am so amazed!!I look at the human body, and with what little I know, it is SSSOOO intricate, complex and perfectly well tuned to function,...
by Alexander A. Villarasa 4 years ago
Someone once said that if one does not believe in the existence of God, then one ends up believing anything and everything. This emanates from the perception that atheism's interpretation of existence is primarily nihilistic, devoid of purpose and meaning. For what is purpose and meaning but an...
by CJ Simonelli 4 years ago
Change - mutations, adaption, survival of the fittest, variations based on the environment, and perhaps even some speciation, as in a new "species" of flies - are undisputed facts that do NOT contradict the Word of God and do NOT reveal evolution theory's premise, but rather reveal an...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|