jump to last post 1-5 of 5 discussions (7 posts)

Do you believe that some bible versions are translated to fit doctrine?

  1. SwordofManticorE profile image80
    SwordofManticorEposted 5 years ago

    Do you believe that some bible versions are translated to fit doctrine?

  2. renegadetory profile image99
    renegadetoryposted 5 years ago

    Oh, most definitely... in the King James versions the word "sheol"  was used as "hell" in many instances when it should have just been "grave" or "pit."  Putting in the word "Easter" and other such discrepancies.  I could find much more...

    1. Disappearinghead profile image77
      Disappearingheadposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Well I was going to post an answer but you said it all. smile

  3. fjohn profile image60
    fjohnposted 5 years ago

    No. It is not translated to fit the doctrines. It is to understand better and know the context well. but now a days people are misusing to fit their own doctrines, that is not appreciable.

    1. SwordofManticorE profile image80
      SwordofManticorEposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Then explain why they put the word hell in most versions when the word hell replaced other words that had other meaning, and the end days doctrine is based on verses like Matt 24:3 when the actual word is "age", not world.

  4. profile image0
    Deepes Mindposted 4 years ago

    Most definitely. A lot of people try to trim the bible to fit their own purposes so that they can reach some people with the purpose of controlling them.

  5. celafoe profile image63
    celafoeposted 4 years ago

    especially the  new ones by some rather unsavory characters, being used to push their doctrines of men

 
working