What distinctions exist between evidence and scientific evidence?
Some evidence cannot be repeated. Some evidence cannot be measured by instruments that can be calibrated for accuracy and certainty of measurement.
But anecdotal and other sparse evidence is still evidence.
For instance, experiments in cold fusion could not be repeated easily. Sometimes they would work and frequently they wouldn't. But this didn't stop some scientists from pursuing the puzzle. They discovered, with careful measurement, why the experiments could not always be repeated. Success required the nodes to remain in a certain state perfect for the work to be done. Not all nodes could achieve or remain in this state.
Perhaps the biggest failure for scientists in the spiritual realm rests on the unwanted extra ingredient that scientists insist on using -- skepticism. If you look closely at the meaning of this word, you will find a potent bias -- doubt. Things like telekinesis, telepathy, remote viewing and the like require faith and no doubt. Scientists have been ruining their own experiments with the poor paradigm of skepticism.
Many skeptics betray their lack of logical skill by insisting that, because there is no evidence to support a thesis, the thesis must be invalid. This is an argument to ignorance type logical fallacy.
Truth doesn't care if you have evidence or not. Truth will remain Truth, whatever that is.
I don't think there is a distinction. Science uses evidence to form conclusions. It doesn't have ownership over it. But the process we use to recognize what is and isn't evidence, is scientific. I often use crossing the street as an example. Because you start with a question "is it safe to cross the street?" Then you test it by looking both ways. You observe that no cars are coming and conclude that yes, it is safe to cross the street. The evidence that proved it was safe to cross the street was already there, but you used the scientific method to observe it.
By contrast, say you're at home and your friend tells you that it's safe to cross the street. Other than trusting your friend's word, the only way you can know for sure is if you walk outside and check. If the evidence is there, you will also confirm it. If it's not, you will conclude that your friend is wrong (for whatever reason).
So, the reason I don't think there is a distinction is because science is built on facts, and evidence is facts. Since claims of the supernatural, be they religious or otherwise, cannot produce consistent evidence (you don't see it when you check for yourself) it falls under the realm of your friend telling you the street is safe to cross. Your friend might be trustworthy, but would you cross the street with their word alone, or would you still look both ways?
by Rhonda D Johnson 7 weeks ago
A Colorado school district is being sued for discrimination. The parents of six year old Coy Matthis, who they say has identified himself as a girl since he was a toddler, are incensed that the school will not allow him to use the girls’ bathroom. An internet search for this...
by aka-dj 2 years ago
A worldwide flood (like described by Noah's flood) is said to be part of many cultures folklore.Creationist proponents belive geological evidence "supports " such an event. Atheists (and others) do not. What do you think?
by Sean Thomas Gartland 6 years ago
If you have any evidence please present it.
by Joseph O Polanco 21 months ago
As an Atheist, would you say you accept all evidence or just scientific evidence?
by The Reluctant Revivalist 2 years ago
Is there scientific evidence that God exists?
by sibtain bukhari 5 years ago
There is no scientific and logical evidence of self existence of universe, therefore,only logical conclusion is the creator of universe not proving its self existence .
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|