Morality is objective

Jump to Last Post 1-9 of 9 discussions (52 posts)
  1. lovetherain profile image72
    lovetherainposted 9 months ago

    There is good and evil, right and wrong. KLH may object, as do many materialists.

    God gave us a conscience to help guide us. It is one of the main things that make us human, that separates us from animals.

    1. Muhammad Ashhar profile image74
      Muhammad Ashharposted 9 months agoin reply to this

      Every object in the universe, tangible or intangible, is recognized by its opposite. There would be no reason to call something itself unless the opposite of that thing existed. For example, joy is distinguished by sorrow, knowledge by ignorance, appearance by reality, and so on. Similarly, good or right are distinguished by evil or wrong. No matter how much anyone condemns evil, it will always exist, as long as good exists.

      Here is an intricate concept. We all know it to be true that good is where our conscience leads us, it always will. Good can be found everywhere, in every part of the world. Sometimes, the situation is somewhat complicated and things seem to appear in the grey area. In some situations, lesser bad may need to be done for the greater good, which will be the "right" thing to do for the moment - otherwise, if we follow literal meanings of morality, doing lesser good at a moment may uproot greater bad eventually, which will ironically be "wrong".

      Now, this is a very delicate subject and must be scrutinized with open heart and mind. All I want to say is, the final judgment is case-sensitive and some things cannot just be perceived with binary intention.

      Thank you for sharing this.

      1. PhoenixV profile image65
        PhoenixVposted 9 months agoin reply to this

        ..."We all know it to be true that good is where our conscience leads us, it always will."...

        How do you account for that?

        1. Muhammad Ashhar profile image74
          Muhammad Ashharposted 9 months agoin reply to this

          Generally speaking, the natural conscience is ingrained with the knowledge of good. Of course, it is not always easy to access the conscience, in some people, it becomes so twisted that it molds their complete thought patterns.

          Otherwise, how do you assume the collective wisdom of people agree whether some "practice" or "action" is good or bad? Think of an extremely horrible action from someone. What made you evaluate that it was horrible?

          I think people are naturally inclined toward love, and love leads to the good of things. However, the world is complex, and so are people. We can twist our own thoughts and make ourselves into believing bizarre things.

          1. wilderness profile image96
            wildernessposted 9 months agoin reply to this

            "Generally speaking, the natural conscience is ingrained with the knowledge of good."  If that were true we would find morals pretty similar through time and area.  We don't, and that's because what the conscience finds good or bad comes from the moral code, not the other way around.  Just as you say, we can and do twist things into believe the truly bizarre...to us; others find OUR beliefs and codes "bizarre" and "wrong".

            1. lovetherain profile image72
              lovetherainposted 9 months agoin reply to this

              You have it backwards. There wouldn't even be a sense of right and wrong if there wasn't moral objectivity. That we even have a conscience proves this.

              1. Aime F profile image83
                Aime Fposted 9 months agoin reply to this

                So how do you explain the in what’s considered to be moral over time? The difference of morality between cultures?

                1. PhoenixV profile image65
                  PhoenixVposted 9 months agoin reply to this

                  I could be wrong but I believe LTR is suggesting some underlying objective morality that is the source of conscience itself. Some objective moral pattern or matrix that exists outside a humans subjective use of conscience and morality. Maybe LTR can clarify.

                  Happy New Year btw. How was your Christmas? Coal?

                  1. lovetherain profile image72
                    lovetherainposted 9 months agoin reply to this

                    Christmas was wonderful, my father survived.

                  2. Aime F profile image83
                    Aime Fposted 9 months agoin reply to this

                    Happy new year to you as well!

                    Christmas was okay... not as much coal as I wanted but what can you do? Guess I’ll have to be even snarkier this year.

                2. lovetherain profile image72
                  lovetherainposted 9 months agoin reply to this

                  People choose to go against their conscience.

                  1. Aime F profile image83
                    Aime Fposted 9 months agoin reply to this

                    Which people? How do you know whose version of morality is the objectively right one?

            2. Muhammad Ashhar profile image74
              Muhammad Ashharposted 9 months agoin reply to this

              I think I am getting your point. "...what the conscience finds good or bad comes from the moral code, not the other way around." If we are really evaluating everything around us based on the established moral code, knowingly or unknowingly, that would just raise more questions. Who established the moral code? How did they establish it if their own conscience followed a prior moral code, and who established that?

              There must be a First Cause. The source of everything that enters into this world, good or evil, is one. The First Cause is divine/natural. The glimpse of this First Cause is ingrained in human beings; let's say it the Natural Conscience. All one can do is try to perceive it. How else can we explain the infinite innocence of children, what moral code is a newborn sent with?

              People may develop different perspectives of good and bad with time, but love is found everywhere and at every age. There must be a naturally ingrained inclination in human beings. How people use/twist/abuse their conscience is another matter.

            3. pattyfloren profile image81
              pattyflorenposted 9 months agoin reply to this

              And sometimes we get fed up with the good wrong people do to us, thinking its bad.

  2. psycheskinner profile image86
    psycheskinnerposted 9 months ago

    That is a statement of your subjective belief -- unless you are the only perfect omniscient human being and the rest of human diversity is error. 

    I mean, we all think our beliefs are correct or we wouldn't have them, but claims of their universal and objective truth are veiled attempts to force others to follow them-- and we don't have the right to do that.

    A more productive approach to to find widely agreed 'good' things, such as that suffering is bad, and people should be able to pursue their own goals-- and society should try to make those two things happen without overly trampling each other.

    1. lovetherain profile image72
      lovetherainposted 9 months agoin reply to this

      That is why I mentioned conscience, which we all possess.

      1. psycheskinner profile image86
        psycheskinnerposted 9 months agoin reply to this

        I am not sure how that helps with trying to assert your beliefs are objective truth.  But as a matter of inconvenient detail, not all people have conscience, and some animals do -- if you operationalize it as empathy and guilt (or pretty much anything objectively observable).

        1. lovetherain profile image72
          lovetherainposted 9 months agoin reply to this

          I didn't say MY beliefs are objective truth. I said morality is objective. There is good,and there is evil.

    2. AF Mind profile image69
      AF Mindposted 9 months agoin reply to this

      If morality is subjective, why is it that someone does not have the right to do that? Not saying that they do, but if morality is subjective then calling that good or bad is subjective as well.

      1. lovetherain profile image72
        lovetherainposted 9 months agoin reply to this

        They know there is a right and wrong

  3. wilderness profile image96
    wildernessposted 9 months ago

    If morality was objective it would be the same over time and all over the world.  It is far from both, pretty much proving that morality is dependent on the people of the time and area.  Subjective, in other words.

    1. lovetherain profile image72
      lovetherainposted 9 months agoin reply to this

      People choose evil over good all the time. Doesn't make it subjective at all.

      1. wilderness profile image96
        wildernessposted 9 months agoin reply to this

        And they also claim that what YOU call evil is actually good.  Sometimes even good as ordained by God.

        Which totally makes it subjective...unless you're claiming that only you know what is good and what is evil - that anyone that disagrees with you is wrong.  Which once more makes it subjective, if it all has to come from one person.

        1. lovetherain profile image72
          lovetherainposted 9 months agoin reply to this

          Only God knows. We as humans can sort of figure it out.

          1. wilderness profile image96
            wildernessposted 9 months agoin reply to this

            If so, morals would not vary so widely.  We wouldn't have people killing little girls for going to school.  We wouldn't have people hating gays.  We wouldn't have had slavery.  The killing fields of China would not have existed.  The Inquisition would never have happened, and neither would child abuse. 

            But they did and do.  All done in God's name...because people define what God wants according to what they want.  Because people everywhere define their own morals and they don't often match with what others define.  The only (nearly) universal moral is the Golden Rule, and that is so often twisted and spun until whatever the person wants to do is "moral".

            It's called being subjective.

          2. Aime F profile image83
            Aime Fposted 9 months agoin reply to this

            If God has decided what’s moral then it’s not objective. It would be dependent on God’s subjectivity.

            1. parrster profile image85
              parrsterposted 9 months agoin reply to this

              Morality is determined through God, but not determined by some process of  random selection, but rather by the very standard of His character, His nature. God's character determining God's will. God’s holy and loving essence governing what He commands from His creation. Thus the values of morality are not based primarily upon what God has said, but upon who He is.
              As humans created in this God's image, morality is part of our heritage. We have been purposely ingrained with a sensibility toward right and wrong; a conscience that finds its innate objectivity in Gods architecture of us. It is part of us. We are morally aware due to design; not evolution, not biological advantage; not even religion. Design.

              1. Kathryn L Hill profile image80
                Kathryn L Hillposted 9 months agoin reply to this

                We learn it from our parents ... Or maybe we don't.  Maybe we unlearn morality from our parents. Then we have to relearn it from religion.

            2. AF Mind profile image69
              AF Mindposted 9 months agoin reply to this

              God did not decide what was moral. He is perfect, so he would have perfect morals based on an objective standard, not something that he comes up with out of nowhere.

              1. Aime F profile image83
                Aime Fposted 9 months agoin reply to this

                Then what does God have to do with morality at all? If it’s some other objective standard then that reduces God to nothing more than a messenger. And which God are we assuming displays perfect objective morals? How do you know that God represents the objective standard and not some other one?

                1. AF Mind profile image69
                  AF Mindposted 9 months agoin reply to this

                  It does not mean God is the messenger. It means that he himself is the message.

                  I am referring to the God of the Tanakh and Brit Hadasha, what you call the Bible.

                  1. Aime F profile image83
                    Aime Fposted 9 months agoin reply to this

                    And that’s the correct God because... why?

    2. MizBejabbers profile image90
      MizBejabbersposted 9 months agoin reply to this

      Gee whiz, Wilderness, another area in which we agree. Lordy Mercy! But I don't see how anyone versed in history can disagree that morality is subjective. I've always said that sin, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. Take dancing, for instance. How can anyone possibly say that beautiful ballerina is creating sin? Especially when some religions use dance as an instrument of worship.
      How can anyone say that having a drink of alcohol is sinful when the Lord Jesus turned water into wine and probably consumed a couple of cups at that same wedding? Oh, how we love to judge.

      1. wilderness profile image96
        wildernessposted 9 months agoin reply to this

        No doubt the earth will open up and swallow us both!

        Absolutely we judge others...based on the code of morals/ethics we have designed and built for ourselves.  Theirs doesn't matter, does it?

    3. AF Mind profile image69
      AF Mindposted 9 months agoin reply to this

      Objective morality does not mean everyone would agree on the same thing just like everyone does not agree on everything else that is objective. Facts can be denied. And we have the choice to say something is wrong even if it is right.

      1. MizBejabbers profile image90
        MizBejabbersposted 9 months agoin reply to this

        That sounds like being subjective to me.

        1. AF Mind profile image69
          AF Mindposted 9 months agoin reply to this

          No, it just means some people have the wrong idea about it. If someone comes up with a scientific theory you would not call that subjective. You would test it to see if it is correct. Morality is the exact same way.

          1. wilderness profile image96
            wildernessposted 9 months agoin reply to this

            How do you test morality?  A poll of earth's residents with the majority being right regardless of what others, or past people, believed?

            1. AF Mind profile image69
              AF Mindposted 9 months agoin reply to this

              You take every detail into context. What is happening? What will be the result? Who is involved? Why are they doing this? It is not always as simple as saying x is always right and y is always wrong. There are some things that I believe to be completely wrong such as murder or rape, but we have to look at things logically and see what the result would be in order to determine if it is good or bad.

          2. Live to Learn profile image80
            Live to Learnposted 9 months agoin reply to this

            Never heard it put that way, but good job. You're right. A free society is constantly evaluating morals and determining if they are good for the whole. Morality has evolved over the years in our society; in an attempt to ensure the ultimate goal is continuously fine tuned to be more inclusive of greater numbers of individuals. Thus the constant conflict. We have to prove, through action, how adjustments are 'good' or 'bad' within the framework we define as morally good. If a proposed change proves not universally beneficial then it eventually falls to the wayside. If, through implementation it proves 'good' in the minds of the majority it gets more time for thought and may eventually gain a permanent foothold.

            So, the framework you start with is subjective but the implementation and evolution becomes objective.

  4. Kathryn L Hill profile image80
    Kathryn L Hillposted 9 months ago

    KLH here. Yes. Morality is objective. It is based on the laws of nature. Morality is not based on the passing fancies and whims of the human mind. It is based on the reality and truth of existence.

    What is basis of existence?
    Is it something that randomly unfolded with the procession of
    accidentally-occurring evolution??
    NO!

    Rather, it is something that unfolded with the carefully-guided procession of evolution.

    1. Kathryn L Hill profile image80
      Kathryn L Hillposted 9 months agoin reply to this

      Unified Super Force, commonly referred to as Mighty Triple O. 



      ... well, what do YOU suppose is the power, intelligence and love behind

                                           N A T U R E?

  5. PhoenixV profile image65
    PhoenixVposted 9 months ago

    There has to be some very complex inherited genetic polygenic master program to explain blue eyes and a conscience, I want to believe.

    1. lovetherain profile image72
      lovetherainposted 9 months agoin reply to this

      Genetics explains protein structure. Nothing more.

  6. Kathryn L Hill profile image80
    Kathryn L Hillposted 9 months ago

    Is it moral to wear low-cut revealing dresses, etc., as so many movie stars did in the Golden Globes tonight?
    Especially in light of the # Me Too movement?

  7. Kathryn L Hill profile image80
    Kathryn L Hillposted 9 months ago

    What is the good of morality?

  8. cheaptrick profile image72
    cheaptrickposted 9 months ago

    Define 'Good' and 'Evil' regardless of time and circumstance;Until then the terms are simply to nebulous for discussion .

    1. Kathryn L Hill profile image80
      Kathryn L Hillposted 9 months agoin reply to this

      "too nebulous for discussion." I disagree. We have to know What "Good" refers to. We have to define Why something is "Evil." Why it should not be done.

      The concept of Good vs Evil is good for adults to discuss, but not children.

      What are the benefits of morals as set forth by religion?

      I would say they are good for self and others.

      They are laws of decent behavior. We can't just act without reason for restraint.

      We can act, and set good examples, as we wish children would for their own sake, individually, and for the sake of society as a whole.

  9. Kathryn L Hill profile image80
    Kathryn L Hillposted 9 months ago

    The Ten Commandments are good. But following them does not make one good. It makes one wise.

    It is good to be wise.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)