Atheist or Agnostic

1. 66

   Eng.Mposted 13 years ago

   after going through some ideas by whom called themselves Atheists
   I was wondering how they can be very sure God doesn't exist?
   
   natural selection ? evolution ?
   were these theories proven to be probably true at least?
   where are the fossils?
   do proposed theories explain the major question ever, the origin of life?
   
   why don't Atheists call themselves Agnostics instead in case they have thought there are no enough evidences for creationism?
   
   thanx

   replyreport
2. 81

   earnestshubposted 13 years ago

   It's simple really. Atheists choose not to believe in fairytales and then base their lives on them!

   replyreport
   1. 63

      TheSituationposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      AWESOME!  best quote of the day!

      replyreport
3. 73

   Cagsilposted 13 years ago

   Creationism is religion's form of explaining.
   
   Evolution is humanity's form of explaining.
   
   Does Evolution answer the origins of life? Yes, it does. There is no need for fossils or anything else.
   
   Science has proven Earth in and of itself is Evolving. And, continues to evolve as time continues to progress forward.
   
   Life came from Earth's evolution.
   
   Religion has no supportive evidence for it's own creationism explanation, except to claim it comes from the "GOD" concept.
   
   Religion created by man. Therefore, the "GOD" concept is false, just as Jesus' work claims.
   
   Remember, the interpretation of Jesus' work is misconstrued and out of context. Also, religion was around and enslaving human beings, long before Jesus was ever born.
   
   Also, even within religion there is a conflict, because Jesus' work/teachings specifically states that He himself was against religion and the false "GOD" it claimed to worship.
   
   So, this pits Jesus's work against Moses and Abraham. Only one of them can be correct.
   
   Science uses Evolution and all other fields, such as biology, physiology, psychology and every other scientific method, to explain life. In the 70's it took a shot at debunking religion and in doing so, was attacked by the Roman Catholic Church.
   
   The Roman Catholic Church was successful at discrediting biology and psychology, because those were mere infant sciences. However, over the last 30+ years, those fields are FULLY CREDITED and no longer dismissable, as much as they were then.
   
   Therefore, Science HAS debunked Religion's claim of God.

   replyreport
   1. 66

      Eng.Mposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      hi
      
      you say:
      (Science has proven Earth in and of itself is Evolving. And, continues to evolve as time continues to progress forward.)
      
      which could support the creature diversity matter
      
      
      and say:
      (Life came from Earth's evolution.)
      
      please back up your argument
      how could evolution explain the beginning of life?
      
      thanx

      replyreport
      1. 73

         Cagsilposted 13 years agoin reply to this

         The animals came from the planet, just like humans came from the planet. ALL life-forms that live on Earth, came from Earth's changing.
         
         Evolution doesn't need to explain the beginning of life. You ask a question that is useless. And, never actually need be answered. It's a theologians way to try and discredit science's achievements.
         
         Common-sense dictates Earth came to be. Afterwhich, Life began. Human life began once Earth evolved to support human life.
         
         Life is just that. It simply exists, because of Earth exists.
         
         No need for anything else.

         replyreport
         1. 66

            Eng.Mposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            how did earth exist?
            
            is earth an infinite object ?

            replyreport
         2. 66

            Flightkeeperposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            What a bunch of hooey!  Can't even think to ask questions about evolution. 

            replyreport
   2. 60

      Valerie Fposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      Cagsil, what you say about the Catholic Church attempting to discredit sciences they regarded as "infant" in the 1970's would be laughable if you didn't make the mistake of taking it seriously.

      replyreport
      1. 66

         Flightkeeperposted 13 years agoin reply to this

         Valerie, they are laughable, they did make that mistake and they don't question it. And what's funnier is they're so dogmatic about it!

         replyreport
4. 66

   Flightkeeperposted 13 years ago

   Atheists and agnostics are just stupid people.

   replyreport
   1. 81

      earnestshubposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      ......... Whereas the sky fairy believers are geniuses!

      replyreport
   2. 61

      tantrumposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      thank you very much !
      Appreciate it !

      replyreport
      1. 67

         drej2522posted 13 years agoin reply to this

         don't take it so personally, tantrum...haha...it's not like Flightkeeper wasn't being polite.

         replyreport
         1. 61

            tantrumposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            So she was being polite ?
            Oh ! I don't want to know what's she like when she isn't !

            replyreport
            1. 67

               drej2522posted 13 years agoin reply to this

               ha, sorry, I should have indicated that I was using sarcasm there.

               replyreport
   3. 63

      Mishaposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      Thank you. Christians are terminally stupid, really. And you are leading the pack in that sense

      replyreport
      1. 66

         Flightkeeperposted 13 years agoin reply to this

         Misha, you are a prime example of those moronic atheist/agnostic or whatever dogmatics.  Thank you.

         replyreport
5. 66

   Flightkeeperposted 13 years ago

   See what I mean?

   replyreport
6. 72

   wyanjenposted 13 years ago

   To answer your question, I don't call myself an agnostic because... I'm an atheist.
   
   What do you mean by in case?
   Why don't christians call themselves Buddhists instead, in case there is "not enough evidence" of heaven?
   

   replyreport
   1. 0

      mdawson17posted 13 years agoin reply to this

      Good point wyanjen

      replyreport
      1. 72

         wyanjenposted 13 years agoin reply to this

         thanks.
         
         If you have a "just in case" inclination, that's cool.
         But you don't have enough conviction to really identify yourself as one thing or the other if you are saying "in case".
         

         replyreport
7. 66

   Flightkeeperposted 13 years ago

   Hi Tantrum!

   replyreport
   1. 61

      tantrumposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      you call me stupid and then you say hi ????
      
      ????????????????
      that's funny !

      replyreport
      1. 66

         Flightkeeperposted 13 years agoin reply to this

         I'm glad you find it funny!

         replyreport
8. 66

   Flightkeeperposted 13 years ago

   But you are the exception.

   replyreport
   1. 60

      Rayalternatelyposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      Yikes... If tantrum's the exception, that means I'm clearly in the "stupid" camp, and I haven't even posted yet!

      replyreport
9. 0

   zampanoposted 13 years ago

   all this is simply preposterous.

   replyreport
10. 67

    drej2522posted 13 years ago

    I think everybody is stupid...holy cow!

    replyreport
    1. 63

       Mishaposted 13 years agoin reply to this

       LOL No question about that. Yet some are more stupid than others

       replyreport
       1. 67

          drej2522posted 13 years agoin reply to this

          oh yes...different levels of stupidity for sure.
          
          wyanjen ~ tantrum totally stole the idea..

          replyreport
          1. 72

             wyanjenposted 13 years agoin reply to this

             well, it is a good look...
             You seem to have started the latest avatar fashion trend
             
             I'll be going back to purple coffee mug soon, myself

             replyreport
    2. 72

       wyanjenposted 13 years agoin reply to this

       Are you and tantrum dressing the same on purpose?
       
       I can't tell you guys apart tonight.
       It's not because I'm stupid. You are both wearing effective camouflage.

       replyreport
11. 74

    cheaptrickposted 13 years ago

    Any one familiar with Gnostic beliefs?
    Specifically,Christian Gnostic's?

    replyreport
    1. 72

       wyanjenposted 13 years agoin reply to this

       I know very little about Gnostic beliefs.
       Do you have a hub about it? I'd be interested to read it.

       replyreport
       1. 74

          cheaptrickposted 13 years agoin reply to this

          Hi Wynjen,It would be a very long complicated Hub so may take some time to do it justice.
          I'll try but not sure I'm capable of it.
          Made me a Christian again.

          replyreport