A Newsweek poll of Americans in April of last year found that..."Nearly half (48 percent) described themselves as both "religious and spiritual," while another 30 percent said they were "spiritual but not religious." Only 9 percent said they were neither religious nor spiritual.
What does it mean to be spiritual but not religious? Do you have to be pro-active in some way? Is this another term for "New Ager?" Does Spiritual infer belief in God?
Just curious. The subject came up in another thread.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/192915/page/1
I am a 'deeply spiritual person'. All it means is that i am very 'in tune' with my self and the world around me..Like being in a constant state of meditation. I speak the truths of my heart and soul. There's nothing 'eerie' or anything like that about it. It's just simplicity.
But i'm also down with a number of spiritual practices, and concepts, because they help to relax and open the mind..Like buddhism, zen, feng shui, sacred tibetan teachings..etc..It is the power of inner peace..Is what spirituality is.
I consider myself to be spirtual but not religious. This is because I truly believe in a higher power and see values and morals that I agree with throughout a bunch of different religions. However, I do not practice "rituals" of any kind in particular. I "pray" in my own way, I "bless" my loved ones, food or surroundings in my own ways, or I even battle my intuition to determine my "best actions."
In the modern era the attribute of being "spiritual" infers the compromising of oneself into being content with life around you, without actually putting forth the effort to learn and investigate that life. I've noticed that far too many people don't have confidence in their own judgment, and feel that they will be deceived. In light of this, they "create" their own religion, or shell, to protect themselves and their notion that they have not been deceived. It's understandable. Modern society has advocated the mindset of "reward without effort." This is part of the reason of the new age distaste of "organized religion." The modern rendition of spirituality requires no sacrifice and no effort to master oneself. It is built upon sandy foundations and will eventually falter.
Of course, this mindset has always existed, but has been fueled in today's world. Just like schooling and work, all knowledge and happiness requires effort, study and application. There is really no way around it. That's life. To be content and happy without the actual effort to "seek" answers is farce, and will only cause further misery and distress.
It is meaningless. There's no such things as spirits so it makes no sense that one is "spiritual" - philosophical claptrap.
earnest you see through a lazerbeam that cannot move
I would suspect that those who make claims to being spiritual are the arrogant ones, don't you think?
Then, explain yourself, why do you think I'm arrogant making that post?
For starters, your attitude is, 'I am right and you are wrong.' Is that not a prime example of arrogance?
What makes you think you have the answer to what the truth is Earnest? In which way are you superior?
How do you get that from my post?
A long bow indeed! Or is that your psychotic little god speaking for you?
You quoted 'Sometimes it is the truth'..Was that not an indication of you seemingly knowing truth?
Forget your own post?
"I am a 'deeply spiritual person'. All it means is that i am very 'in tune' with my self and the world around me..Like being in a constant state of meditation. I speak the truths of my heart and soul. There's nothing 'eerie' or anything like that about it. It's just simplicity.
But i'm also down with a number of spiritual practices, and concepts, because they help to relax and open the mind..Like buddhism, zen, feng shui, sacred tibetan teachings..etc..It is the power of inner peace..Is what spirituality is."
So when you make flat statements somehow that is "truth"?
To speak from the heart, to be honest, that is pure truth, is it not?
You get an exemption because you speak "from the heart"?
Hilarious!
You exempted yourself by saying what you say is "truth from the heart" So yes, you did exactly what you accuse others of!
you wouldnt know truth if it slaped you in the face!!!
I never said such a thing, I simply offered an opinion from a reality based position, one in which the physical laws of the universe are firmly planted. "Spirits" clearly violate a number of our physical laws, hence they can't possibly exist.
If you have some evidence for spirits or can explain to me how they can violate our physical laws, feel free to present it. I await your intelligent response.
Quantum physics is a science is it not?
Physical laws are not what they once were.
When people choose to be close minded, how can they learn about these things?
If there was physical evidence, we wouldn't be having this discussion, obviously.
I don't care to prove anything to anyone. This thread posed a question, and i was simply answering it.
People are free to learn about the physical world around them and to understand why things like spirits can't exist. If they remain close minded, that is their own fault.
Then, why would you believe in spirits?
Me too.
Because there is no physical evidence, does not mean that evidence can not be seen for ones self.
You agree that you don't care to try prove any thing to others, yet here you are, 'informing' me about the non-existence of 'spirits.'
Spiritual person is one who knows himself very deeply. He can't do anything wrong, if by mistake something wrong done then he can't repeat same mistake again.
He has love for all whateever he or she may be. He understand God and understand others.
He speaks soft and sweet. Any one can be a spiritual person and it is not hard. now question arise how??---Wake up early in morning and wash your face. Now seat on chair, slowly forget about this world, try to forget yourself and think as you are small light (soul) and then go away from this world to red world where there is so much light and God is front of me. Take all power from him, talk with him, talk with self do for 15-20 min, then plan yourself what you have to do for whole day--sure you will enjoy your whole day not only you but whoever comes in contact with you they will also feel happy.
Try this surely life will change.
Thanks for posting. I also checked out your website. Thanks, but my colon is just fine the way it is.
Not a chance. An honest person doesn't lie to themselves. To believe in the invisible and undetectable is intellectually dishonest.
Human Spirituality is through honest action, for which, protects their integrity and love for oneself, while you love and understand, and have mercy on those who do not know how to do the same.
Faith is to be placed in oneself and other human beings.
Edit: Human Spirituality doesn't not require religion or religious belief in a god.
I'm one of those "spiritual but not religious" folks.
For me, being spiritual means that I am interested in, focused on, and find it important to 1) be a good person; 2) give to my fellow humans; 3) see the meaning in life and appreciate it; 4) think and feel beyond the superficial level of the ego.
No, religion has nothing to do with it. I know plenty of folks who are deeply religious but just don't "get it."
Sounds like Buddhism without the Buddha.
Would you say there are different varieties of spiritualism just there are different theologies?
Absolutely.
I don't believe that ANY two people can believe and perceive EXACTLY the same thing about ANYTHING. We just aren't made that way. We may think we see things the same, but we don't. Each person's perspective is unique.
I don't know (unless I missed your point.) I'm working with a young man right now who does not feel that "connectedness" to anything or anyone. So, IS it inborn and innate, or is it learned?
Now really, this conversation is just getting humanist- nice
With the varying degrees the eye may have in focusing, most certainly all eyes see the world around us, if functioning correctly. The world does not change from one person to another.
Profoundly true, when it comes to things unseen.
A Spiritual person is one who know God the Father.
Everything else is fake but who is the one who can Judge only the Spiritual themselves.
Spirituality and world's religion go in separate direction.
They're full of all kinds of nasty spirits. Spirit of bigotry, coveting, greed, lying, pride and that spirit of false teaching. I'd rather have the spirit of the granite or a slug.
marcel285 wrote:
I am a 'deeply spiritual person'. All it means is that i am very 'in tune' with my self and the world around me..Like being in a constant state of meditation. I speak the truths of my heart and soul. There's nothing 'eerie' or anything like that about it. It's just simplicity.
But i'm also down with a number of spiritual practices, and concepts, because they help to relax and open the mind..Like buddhism, zen, feng shui, sacred tibetan teachings..etc..It is the power of inner peace..Is what spirituality is.
Will Benson wrote:
Thanks for your thoughtful answer. Would you say that a spiritual person concentrates mostly on the present instead of some future life? Is inner peace it's own reward -- here and now?
Will Benson wrote:
Thanks for your answer.
I think things like treating others fairly, and feeling connected with natural things are inborn and shared regardless of our belief systems.
Lynda Gary wrote:
I don't know (unless I missed your point.) I'm working with a young man right now who does not feel that "connectedness" to anything or anyone. So, IS it inborn and innate, or is it learned?
Will Benson wrote:
I guess I was thinking of some posts in this forum and elsewhere that pondered whether atheists have a personal motivation to act ethically or morally, since they're not reined in by religious beliefs.
I believe that morality and connectedness are probably part of our inborn nature...probably genetic, since it probably increases our evolutionary survival advantage.
When we are overly stressed and depressed we often feel isolated, but hopefully you can motivate your client back to a feeling of being normally "connected." Good luck.
goldenpath wrote:
"...Just like schooling and work, all knowledge and happiness requires effort, study and application. There is really no way around it. That's life. To be content and happy without the actual effort to "seek" answers is farce, and will only cause further misery and distress."
Will Benson wrote:
I agree that probably many people who call themselves "spiritual" don't put much effort into walking that walk. I also know some however, who have done the spiritual meditating and study for decades. They all seem very centered and comfortable in their own skin.
Ques - What do you think would have to happen in order for young people to seek their spirituality from religion rather than from secular sources? Should religions modernize or stand pat?
Thanks for posting.
I think we are seeing the fruits of religions modernizing right now. I take comfort, however, that my own chosen faith is very careful not to compromise doctrine for the sake of numbers and modern convenience. Once you start down the road of compromising your foundation because of what others think, then you have literally stepped off solid ground and onto sand. It is extremely dangerous for an individual and/or religious organization, to justify their actions for the sake of modern views. Lives are at stake.
As far as the young of today - it is beginning to happen. I believe the rising generation is a special and chosen one. It would not be proper to go into the "why" as it is not part of your question posed. The human spirit knows when it has been placed in a perilous situation. A situation fed by media and those of closed minds. Eventually, yet slowly, the spirit longs for answers, liberty and increased agency to choose. One by one, these youth will rise up in the face of such adversity, and will reclaim their bright future. It will be a long road. Will they get it from religion? Not necessarily. What's important is that they not be blind and that they do the seeking for their own answers. They need not be so gullible to accept as truth the banners and snips on the internet or even the opinions of the anchormen on the news. Seek and ye shall find.
I appreciate your comment. I noticed a very interesting sentence though. "They all seem very centered and comfortable in their own skin." I, personally, submit that answers come through consistent sacrifice of those things we hold dear like money, sleep, leisure activity, food and other desires. We are to find joy and meaning in our lives, but we should be far from content in the thought that we are at our full potential. True and meaningful happiness comes through sacrifice. The search for truth and answers is a lifelong process and can be an arduous one. It requires constant effort and nurturing of the elements needed. It requires constant effort in serving others without desiring recompense. It requires charity and heeding those opportunities to uplift another. It requires constant study. It requires constant application of various doctrines, principles or knowledge you wish to test and prove for yourself.
Sure, the answers are out there for each one of us, individually. Yet, there is a big difference between the mask of happiness, and happiness without the mask. The one that's lasting and carries deeper meaning, requires work and sacrifice on the part of the self. The other does not or at least requires very little.
goldenpath - Sorry for the delay in responding. It took me awhile to read your answer and digest it. I liked this part:
"The search for truth and answers is a lifelong process and can be an arduous one. It requires constant effort and nurturing of the elements needed. It requires constant effort in serving others without desiring recompense.
It requires charity and heeding those opportunities to uplift another. It requires constant study. It requires constant application of various doctrines, principles or knowledge you wish to test and prove for yourself."
I may frame that. Thanks for posting.
Thank you for your consideration.
I am religious, but the path to spirituality lies not in stone in religious practices. I'll illustrate this and my previous post with this experience.
I knew this frail old lady who did not go to church, had no desire to go, and yet was grounded in the principles of work that our previous generations were raised with. She was poor and had little heat for comfort in the winter. Still, though, she had knitted blankets for people she did not even know, for years, until her death.
On the flipside, there was this lady who was very staunch in church attendance. She was very "by the letter" in her tithing and was a nice enough person. However, she did very little in service to others. Her entire church going existence hung on the "letter" and not the "spirit" of the law, and therefore didn't progress.
So, which one do I believe progressed spiritually and has found favor with God? The first! Why? Simply because the first took the time to "seek" answers and happiness through the application of charity, which is among the greatest virtues that one can nurture.
Upon death, you leave with the same spirit you died with. If your heart and mind is filled with the love of your fellow beings, than you will be more teachable and more apt to grasp further principles that you'll be taught on the other side. If you leave with a hardened heart towards man, you will still retain that pride when the time comes to learn further principles of our existence, and you will not be as likely to accept or grasp it.
This is why application in this life is so important for those we serve and for us.
I wanna be the ghost of Christmas future, he was always the coolest! Is that what we're on about here?
Right, everyone has the right to believe what they choose too. Wrong, it is wrong to belittle others beliefs..One who has no moral standards and compassion for fellow beings.
Spiritual? The word itself suggests that spirituality is something that links you to celestial stuff and all that. Impressions of someone with a far away look in his eyes ... not bothered about whats going on ... not responding to humor ...
My opinion of course.
Someone who is hell bent on ethics is far more valuable.
Q wrote:
I simply offered an opinion from a reality based position, one in which the physical laws of the universe are firmly planted. "Spirits" clearly violate a number of our physical laws, hence they can't possibly exist.
If you have some evidence for spirits or can explain to me how they can violate our physical laws, feel free to present it. I await your intelligent response.
Will wrote:
Q - I think we should bear in mind that our physical laws (Physics) are often revised as new hypotheses graduate to become accepted theories. Quantum theory, while not experimentally proven by any means, does leave some wiggle room for realities unfamiliar to us.
"String theory is of interest to many physicists because it requires new mathematical and physical ideas to mesh together its very different mathematical formulations. One of the most inclusive of these is the 11-dimensional M-theory, which requires spacetime to have eleven dimensions, as opposed to the usual three spatial dimensions and the fourth dimension of time."
Ref: M. J. Duff, James T. Liu and R. Minasian Eleven Dimensional Origin of String/String Duality: A One Loop Test Center for Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics, Texas A&M University
An 11-dimensional metaverse wouldn't mean Spirits or God necessarily exist, but until/unless its nature were known, anything's possible.
True, string theory works well mathematically but it is still hypothetical (though it's the darling of many physicists).
So, looks like we're stuck with faith and belief, or not, for now.
My thoughts, respectfully.
It is one of the most successful theories science has ever discovered. There are mountains of hard evidence. Ever hear of a particle accelerator?
String theory is purely mathematical and has not yielded a single result. I'm not familiar with that branch of mathematics, but then, few are. And, if there is something that comes from string theory, it will not give any credibility to the supernatural as these theories are for our physical world.
Faith is all there is, nothing more.
In my estimation, just my own, it seems the discussion became two-toned. Being "spiritual" and "spirits" in general. These are two, very different subjects in my judgment. Many know my doctrines on the nature of spirits, but that is not what the thread asked for.
To me, being spiritual is the journey or path in one's life in achieving the fulness of joy and happiness. The word "spiritual" implies the exploration of that part of life which is unseen by the natural eye. Again, notice my use of verbs again as in previous posts. Exploration, true exploration, requires effort in navigation and the courage to accept or deny that which you find. Yes, everyone is an individual and is different. For this reason, everyone's "spiritual exploration" will differ greatly one from another. As mentioned before, what's important is that we are all, at least, making the effort to explore this unending field.
This is what I've often referred to as the "gospel lens." Part of the reason for so much discord on the forums about religion is the view, or perception, of life that each of us have. For those of us who uphold and stand by certain codes of conduct and views, tend to look at the world through the lens of the spirit, or through a set of doctrines and principles upon which the prism of life discerns it's colors. This causes us to see alternate meanings in the events around us, hence a "spiritual perspective."
At the same time, and in respect for the other side, life is viewed through facts, figures and those things which are tangible and easily obtained through the natural senses. That is the world we live in. Both schools of thought are pertinent to happiness in this life. There is room for both. The journey, or exploration, also consists of the painful, yet vital, dilemma of combining both schools of thought so that they work in harmony and concert one with another. This can be painful, I know, but it can happen.
For myself, I have no inconsistencies between the two. To me they work in concert. I view the world through a "gospel lens", and through that lens I discern and apply all science as well as all religious doctrine so that I may be able to look beyond the here and now and gain a clearer view of the end goal.
Just a few more of my own personal views.
Thanks G.P.
Now you've got your homily all written for Sunday.
Actually, for the most part, yes. However, for the first time in local history I've been asked to speak at a Catholic Good Friday service coming up. A Mormon speaking before a Catholic congregation - truly remarkable times, indeed.
Yes, remarkable. It just goes to demonstrate the hatred your cults propagate to those who don't share your beliefs, indeed.
GP - Congratulations on your joint service with the Catholics. Hope all goes well.
Here is a sermon for you, from the good book!
Death for Blasphemy
One day a man who had an Israelite mother and an Egyptian father got into a fight with one of the Israelite men. During the fight, this son of an Israelite woman blasphemed the LORD's name. So the man was brought to Moses for judgment. His mother's name was Shelomith. She was the daughter of Dibri of the tribe of Dan. They put the man in custody until the LORD's will in the matter should become clear. Then the LORD said to Moses, "Take the blasphemer outside the camp, and tell all those who heard him to lay their hands on his head. Then let the entire community stone him to death. Say to the people of Israel: Those who blaspheme God will suffer the consequences of their guilt and be punished. Anyone who blasphemes the LORD's name must be stoned to death by the whole community of Israel. Any Israelite or foreigner among you who blasphemes the LORD's name will surely die. (Leviticus 24:10-16 NLT)
Kill False Prophets
1) Suppose there are prophets among you, or those who have dreams about the future, and they promise you signs or miracles, and the predicted signs or miracles take place. If the prophets then say, 'Come, let us worship the gods of foreign nations,' do not listen to them. The LORD your God is testing you to see if you love him with all your heart and soul. Serve only the LORD your God and fear him alone. Obey his commands, listen to his voice, and cling to him. The false prophets or dreamers who try to lead you astray must be put to death, for they encourage rebellion against the LORD your God, who brought you out of slavery in the land of Egypt. Since they try to keep you from following the LORD your God, you must execute them to remove the evil from among you. (Deuteronomy 13:1-5 NLT)
2) But any prophet who claims to give a message from another god or who falsely claims to speak for me must die.' You may wonder, 'How will we know whether the prophecy is from the LORD or not?' If the prophet predicts something in the LORD's name and it does not happen, the LORD did not give the message. That prophet has spoken on his own and need not be feared. (Deuteronomy 18:20-22 NLT)
That should put the fear of god in em!
Q wrote:
It is one of the most successful theories science has ever discovered. There are mountains of hard evidence. Ever hear of a particle accelerator?
Will Benson wrote:
The Quantum theory/superstring branch is successful only as a mathematical framework but it is not yet supported experimentally. Not at all. Its really Quantum hypothesis. The LHC may support it or the elusive particles may be beyond its production/detection capability. If Quantum is proven viable, most scientists will probably agree that we then would have a workable "theory of everything." I see no reason why this will have any effect on attitudes toward religion or spirituality, which is what this thread is about.
Q wrote:
String theory is purely mathematical and has not yielded a single result. I'm not familiar with that branch of mathematics, but then, few are. And, if there is something that comes from string theory, it will not give any credibility to the supernatural as these theories are for our physical world.
Will Benson wrote:
String and superstring theory -- is a branch of Quantum theory which shows great promise in uniting relativity (dealing with small things) with cosmology and everything in between -- into a single mathematical model. It is untestable as of now, but if it proves workable, the experimental evidence should be doable.
Q wrote:
Faith is all there is, nothing more.
Will Benson Wrote:
??? The Pope couldn't have said it better.
I have been reading all of these posts, and have come to the conclusion that I would weigh in on this debate after all. Truelly "faith is all there is." I will have to submit that in every belief system, faith is required. Even atheism is a task- an inner journey to be undertaken. None of this is easy, or it would not be faith: it would be the cop-out of not being aware of our existence (pretending to ignore our own questions). The fact that all of these are faith systems lies in that these systems are constantly being tested. We are forced to think about what we truelly believe in when we enter these debates, that is what makes them so beneficial (and partially why we are drawn to them).
To be spiritual takes a certain leap of faith. To see so many different people weighing in on this subject gives me hope. Faith is not always easy, but to be willing to post a view on this thread: I can at least know that there are those of us (all views included) who are willing to try.
Gypsy - As I read your post, I think I have to agree that most of our beliefs are based on "faith" rather than things we prove first, then believe. I define faith as a personal belief based on evidence that we consider personally relevant. Maybe I was too flippant in posting the emoticon -- I thought it was amusing and admittedly didn't stop to think that it might offend some people. If you are one of those people, please accept my apologies.
Oh- no aplogy needed. There was no offense.
Religion is a manmade contraption. Religion is what we deem as Christian, or Muslim, etc. It is what man has made it to be. It is more or less a study of physical meaning. Whereas spirituality is a personal feed. What one finds within themselve. Whether they are Satanic, agnostic, or Taoist. I am Taoist or eclectic Taoist I am something different every month. I have very strong and strange spiritual beliefs. Although, if ask I will never respond as religious that is what creates wars. Spirituality is what promotes good chi and life within ones self. Personal journey if you will.
Although, this is fun to look at it: Even in the bible Jesus says that he hs not religious he is spititual. He even meditated.
This is what i find in myself though. This could be a completely different meaning all together within someone else. It just depends on the person.
Heatherward15 - Thanks for your very thoughtful post. You said you're a Taoist - do you think for a person to be spiritual they need a framework like Taoism? Does it vary with the individual? Can atheists be spiritual, in your opinion?
Well I'll take a stab at that question. It would depend I suppose on how one defines spiritual. Many people believe that when they are being spiritual they are in touch or in sync with the "Spirit", or following the leading of the "Spirit".
Of course, the eastern religions are different, but people tend to still believe they are in touch with a higher consciousness.
I think for the atheist, or for the spiritual atheist, it is about being in touch with our own (humanity's) better nature.
When a religiously spiritual person seeks answers within themselves, or outside of themselves as the case may be, I believe their spirituality is tainted by their religious beliefs.
When an atheist seeks answers within themselves, our thoughts are generally tainted by the things humanity in general values, and also by our collective knowledge and experiences.
The spirituality of spiritual believers is based on the spirit or "Spirit" of a god, while the spirituality of spiritual atheists would be based on the spirit of humanity's better nature.
So yes, I'd say atheists can be spiritual, but I'm certain there are many religious believers who would say they can't, based on their definition of spiritual.
by Tim Mitchell 7 years ago
What is the difference between a religious person and spiritual person?Where that question leads to is can a spiritual person be a Christian? In other words, does a Christian have to be religious?
by snapcracklepop 7 years ago
What's the difference between a "spiritual person" and a "physical person" Is there a difference?
by Gary R. Smith 12 years ago
What does it mean when a person is 'spiritual'?That is, what are the characteristics of a truly spiritual person in your view?
by Sarah 14 years ago
Why is the general populace so afraid of a Spiritual person?Generally, a Spiritual person is more grounded than the average person. There have been studies that reflect when a person has a Spiritual experience they become more stable than the norm. Typically, a Spiritual person cannot...
by Phyllis Doyle Burns 11 years ago
I am a spiritual person -- this does not define my beliefs or my religion. What it does mean is that I am true to myself and my beliefs. I was raised a Christian and still have the basic beliefs, that God and Jesus do exist. I pray to God and I talk with Jesus for guidance and healing -- I also...
by AE Williams 12 years ago
Is Religion Lost On you?I want to know how you feel about religion as a way of life. This is for those who have not yet determined a religion or don't understand religion in general. Is there a reason you feel a certain way?
Copyright © 2025 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2025 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |