Many people don't, and MAY NEVER, have a true understanding of faith. Yet we all understand compassion, mercy, empathy, and kindness. Be it atheist, christian, muslim, or any other belief, I suggest we focus on the things we agree on. I believe ALL religions teach unity rather than disunity.
i agree with you but religion is so emotionally attached subject why its followers that discussion becomes impossible...as u said compassion,empathy are universal ...
I am sure some one will post here: "we all understand compassion, mercy, empathy and kindness, because, mind you, it is Jesus Christ who taught it all "
So, we should just ignore the things we don't agree on like the fact that your loving, compassionate, merciful and kind god will send me to burn for an eternity in a lake of hellfire?
Do we just skip over that small detail for the sake of agreeing on other things?
Oh yes, we do understand faith, and it is a very scary thing.
The problem with religion is that they all profess to be the only path to "heaven" and you must follow their teachings if you wish to be with god in the afterlife.
But any religion is like just another corporation looking to expand their market share for not only the souls of believers but their capital too.
Still, all religion has a role to play in society. They also accomplish some good some charity and I'm not one to belittle the beliefs of another, so have faith, practice your beliefs, live and let live.
That might be like vegetarians finding commonalities with meat eaters. And maybe not. Every belief system "could" POSSIBLY??? find more common ground than at first thought.
What about them? If they are capable of reasoning, then the value of unity should be obvious enough to empower them to dedicate themselves to a principle which has positive results for all.
The Ten Commandments For Understanding Another's Religion
1. Thou shalt learn to walk in another's moccasins.
2. Thou shalt aim at understanding above all else, and before all else.
3. Thou shalt learn humility in the face of the phenomena of religion.
4. Thou shalt strive for empathy towards one's own and towards another's religion.
5. Thou shalt not, too quickly, follow ways that reduce religion to another sphere of
experience, culture, or mode of explanation.
6. Thou shalt learn the many ways that one can approach the study of religion.
7. Thou shalt strive to be thorough in one's investigation and research,
acknowledging the contributions of others.
8. Thou shalt learn a flexibility of spirit, a generosity of intellect, and a fullness of
9. Thou shalt come to understand religion as a meeting place of the human spirit
and the divine.
10. Thou shalt learn a spirit of playfulness, and a capacity to enjoy even while being
Danny R Hand said .
I suggest we focus on the things we agree on. I believe ALL religions teach unity rather than disunity.
I would agree with this statement if we just wanted to get along ....But the extreemest won't let that happen. Agreeing to disagree is a state that is better than a declaration of war...
BUT.. nothing ever gets settled that way.
If it could be done in peaceful conversation??? I believe it to be better to eleminate the diffrences by discusing them AND validate the reason for one belief over an other.
Unfortunately as humans, we tend to "stuborn up" and cease discusion when we see support for our beliefs dwendling
No progress will ever be acheived until we can overcome this reflex (fight or flee).
...Communication might be better, if we eliminate all of the "name & title" belief systems, for starters.
I would think this is true to an extent. Denominational tilles and names yes should not be adressed; diffrences within "Christianity" or within Islam etc should be adressed and settled during the process.
Once this has been done we might find fewer diffrences between the "isms".
Need to start someplace such as "does" being babtized in a Church that has a piano in the corner of the room; invalidate my babtism, or what day It took place?
To discover what issues are truly revelant and which are not.
40, love; advantage philo.
could be a double fault for The Ism.
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|