How is DNA related to God?
- Graceful Guardianposted 15 years ago
0 So this is good news. Apparently genes influence everything from what flavor of ice cream I like and pick out at the local Ben and Jerry's stand all the way up to what kind of a woman I would like to screw.
On my books everything is God, including all DNAs
Chimpanzees, too
Or, more pessimistic view, those 2% constitute Gods image. You don't need more to show off the image
maybe we are only 2% god. lol.
98% chimp.how dare I go here, but the "genitals" and the nose. OMG, stop me or I will go to Hell. muaahhahahahha.
yeah, the nose, for sniffin through bullsh*t. hahahahah.
LOL Sandy, you definitely got a whole lot more saucy lately
Or should it be saucier?Hey Jewel! Have you ever studied the Diamond Sutra? I think you would really love it.
I have down loaded a couple of versions of it...and will check it out. thanks
wouldn't it be great if all we had to do was OMMM all day long and beg for food one meal a day!?
I don't think too many people would appreciate us...let alone understand.
actually I would rather apply my energy to helping people in practical ways now that I don't have children around that I have to care for day to day. so I am trying to do that in new and differnt ways.
oops are we on topic...maddie might come and shut us down !
- Zarm Nefilinposted 15 years ago0
Umm, looks like my brains are too old for this
Thanks Mark anyway...You just need to convert to sci-fi, the only TRUE religion, then you would know all about quantum computers and parallel universes. it's all there if you just open your heart to the truth
This is not sci fi:
http://www.quantum.at/zeilinger/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anton_Zeilinger
"In quantum cryptography, Zeilinger’s group is developing a prototype in collaboration with industry. While most of the community was working on the much easier scheme of using weak laser pulses, Zeilinger based his approach exclusively on the more demanding scheme using entangled photons. A recent proof that entanglement is a necessary condition for the security of the quantum channel confirms that this choice is correct.
Zeilinger’s experiments on the distribution of entanglement over large distances began with both free-space and fiber-based quantum communication and teleportation between laboratories located on the different sides of the river Danube. This was then extended to larger distances across the city of Vienna and most recently over 144 km between two Canary Islands, resulting in a successful demonstration that quantum communication with satellites is feasible. His dream was to bounce entangled light off of satellites in orbit.[2] This was achieved during an experiment at the Italian Matera Laser Ranging Observatory.[3]"
Eventually I hope to work with people such as this man and in a field such as his.
Nothing science fiction about what he does, even if I am optimistically speculating about some of it.
btw lol @ picture
P.S.
This guy might have a sci fi feel to him but he is a very accomplished theoretical physicist who envisions a future of bold possibilities:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michio_Kaku
"Kaku is the author of several scholarly Ph.D. level textbooks on string theory and quantum field theory and has had more than 70 articles published in journals covering topics superstring theory, supergravity supersymmetry, and hadronic physics. He is also author of the popular science books, Visions, Hyperspace, and Parallel Worlds, and co-authored Beyond Einstein with Jennifer Thompson. Hyperspace was a best-seller and was voted one of the best science books of the year by both the New York Times[1] and the Washington Post. Parallel Worlds was a finalist for the Samuel Johnson Prize for non-fiction in the UK.
His latest book, Physics of the Impossible, examines the technologies of invisibility, teleportation, telepathy, star ships, anti-matter engines, time travel, all regarded as things that are not possible today but that might be possible in the future. In this book, he ranks these subjects according to when, if ever, these technologies might become reality. In March, Physics of the Impossible hit the New York Times Best-seller list."
He is 99% speculation and 1% legit (I like to say that just for effect ).
Btw Leonardo DaVinci conceived of a helicopter to the tune of some 400+ odd years before its existance
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonardo_da_Vinci
"As an engineer, Leonardo conceived ideas vastly ahead of his own time, conceptualising a helicopter, a tank, concentrated solar power, a calculator, and the double hull, and outlining a rudimentary theory of plate tectonics. Relatively few of his designs were constructed or even feasible during his lifetime,[c] but some of his smaller inventions, such as an automated bobbin winder and a machine for testing the tensile strength of wire, entered the world of manufacturing unheralded.[d] As a scientist, he greatly advanced the state of knowledge in the fields of anatomy, civil engineering, optics, and hydrodynamics"
These are all people from whom I draw inspiration and whose life inspires me in my own humble endeavor to understand things and be creative.LOL all that does not explain a bit about what quantum computers are.
You know, I deal with computers for more than 20 years, and pretty much understand how bits work and how they are implemented.
For the life of me, I can't understand this about those qua-qua bites reading this wikipedia article... And Leonardo da Vinci's helicopter is not of a big help here eitherhttp://computer.howstuffworks.com/quantum-computer1.htm
excerpt from page 2:
A read-write device reads these symbols and blanks, which gives the machine its instructions to perform a certain program. Does this sound familiar? Well, in a quantum Turing machine, the difference is that the tape exists in a quantum state, as does the read-write head. This means that the symbols on the tape can be either 0 or 1 or a superposition of 0 and 1; in other words the symbols are both 0 and 1 (and all points in between) at the same time. While a normal Turing machine can only perform one calculation at a time, a
quantum Turing machine can perform many calculations at once.
"Today's computers, like a Turing machine, work by manipulating bits that exist in one of two states: a 0 or a 1. Quantum computers aren't limited to two states; they encode information as quantum bits, or qubits, which can exist in superposition. Qubits represent atoms, ions, photons or electrons and their respective control devices that are working together to act as computer memory and a processor. Because a quantum computer can contain these multiple states simultaneously, it has the potential to be millions of times more powerful than today's most powerful supercomputers."
From page 2 and also:
"This superposition of qubits is what gives quantum computers their inherent parallelism. According to physicist David Deutsch, this parallelism allows a quantum computer to work on a million computations at once, while your desktop PC works on one. A 30-qubit quantum computer would equal the processing power of a conventional computer that could run at 10 teraflops (trillions of floating-point operations per second). Today's typical desktop computers run at speeds measured in gigaflops (billions of floating-point operations per second)."
From page 2.
Hope that explains
- Zarm Nefilinposted 15 years ago0
Oh, yeh oops!
I will oneday be studying and learning Quantum Mechanics in college and either end up in cosmology or working directly on quantum teleportation projects.
Hence the interest
Not enough reason to convert I think
If they could explain steelhead trout mystery, then I would have thought about convertingSome mysteries are only available to the initiated
Nope, not really. Both wiki and your link leave out the part of how to match a particular thread or task or whatever you call it to the particular value out of eternity of qubit values. This is the part I think I can't really grasp. Of course it is possible I did not grasp something else and the problem I am thinking about does not exist at all
And all this relates to DNA and God...how??!!
I can see how it relates.
Your right Mark, my take on what is happening concretely in the here and now is more science fiction than science reality at the moment, although it is not theoretically impossible at this point given the current understanding of the laws of quantum mechanics, which by implication <<currently>>makes it theoretically possible. I suppose the reason I romance with such ideas is because I am a theoretical physicist at heart, and if there is anyway to extrapolate given certain data then the harder it is to extrapolate the bigger the challenge involved and the more happiness I get from it. Perhaps I am just a visionary inventor who would like to create a device that made teleportation possible, safe, and effective, as well as energy efficient. I would like to see such a project through to completion even if it is damn near impossible. If after years of college and subsequent conversations, experiments and projects such a thing was found by me to be something that was only conceptually possible then I would have to give up, but our current understanding of quantum mechanics (as I understand the current understanding of quantum mechanics) makes entertaining the idea of a teleportation device and it's construction theoretically feasible albeit very difficult to grasp. Essentially we already have teleportation devices, but they teleport things on a sub atomic level. While it does not follow (necessarily) that such a thing could operate successfully in such a manner as to say 'revolutionize the shipping and recieving industry' or 'revolutionize the transportation industry' it certainly seems like the stars are worth shooting for so to speak. Here are some quotes from one of several articles I have read:
Anton Zeilinger:
Here is an article by him (and btw he is being seriously considered for a nobel prize atm):
http://www.signandsight.com/features/614.html
Here are quotes from that article (quotes an in Q and A format):
What are you doing?
Transferring the properties of light particles over certain distances onto other light particles, with no time delay. The procedure is based on phenomena which exist only in the quantum world, and is known as "quantum teleportation.""
It sounds almost as exciting as "beaming".
Yes, but there are two major differences. Firstly, we transfer properties, not matter. And secondly, until now we have had more success with light particles and occasionally with atoms, not with larger objects
Another quote:
Some teams of physicists are already teleporting single atoms. So what really stands in the way of beaming humans?
We are talking about quantum phenomena here – we have no idea how we could produce these with larger objects. And even if it was possible, the problems involved would be huge. Firstly: for physical reasons, the original has to be completely isolated from its environment for the transfer to work. There has to be a total vacuum for it to work. And it is a well-known fact that this is not particularly healthy for human beings. Secondly, you would take all the properties from a person and transfer them onto another. This means producing a being who no longer has any hair colour, no eye colour, nix. A man without qualities! This is not only unethical – it's so crazy that it's impossible to imagine.
Also this:
"What do think are the limits of teleportation?
Who knows, perhaps in a thousand years we really will be able to teleport a coffee cup. But beware: even the tiniest interference can mean that the cup arrives without its handle. This method of transport would be far too dangerous for humans.
Why is the procedure so sensitive to disturbance?
Because any disturbance – and this goes for a measurement or observation – alters the state of the particles which are involved in the teleportation. The rules of quantum physics are completely different from those of the world we live in. For quantum teleportation we use methods of entanglement. This is a particular state which can connect two or more particles, but which disappears as soon as it is observed from outside.
Entanglement – we should imagine this as...
...there is no way of imagining it. The Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger coined the term in 1935 and also said that the twist in the phenomenon of quantum physics is that it forces us to bid farewell to all our dearly held ideas about the world."
The entire article is fascinating and if you are interested (Mark) and have a bit of time, I think you might enjoy the read of it. Zeilinger is a very bright individual and in the interview Zeilinger goes on to describe the philosophical implications of quantum physics.
Zeilinger talks about what einstein called 'spooky action in effect' and it is thoroughly fascinating to me!
Who knows maybe I just find those things amazing and most other people do not, I don't know. I certainly have not met even so much as a physics student yet let alone a professor. I would like to eventually get in this field, and hopefully someday will have the connections to do so, I sure as hell am gunna work hard at getting into the right school when I do study this stuff.
- sandra rinckposted 15 years ago0
- sandra rinckposted 15 years ago0
so it is like reading 10 as a single number instead of 1 + 0 + triangle etc. right?
Please tell me I am close. - Zarm Nefilinposted 15 years ago0
Take it easy Zarm, ok?
You are NOT required to have answers to all the questions. You will tell me when you learn it yourself. Or, I tell you, if I learn it before you
And yes, you are only afraidThx Misha.
- Zarm Nefilinposted 15 years ago0
- sandra rinckposted 15 years ago0
I would say that unlocking the entire human genome would probabaly aid in the frontier of teleportation. I mean, it would probabaly be a tremedous help to know that after you get zapped from one place to the other that all your molocules are back in the right order so you don't come out looking like a flying speghitti moster. LOL.
I pesonally feel that all the hidden things that science discovers is understanding God to me, though many greatly disagree, but hey just cause I can't see it, doesn't mean it is not there. Of the several points you could have responded to in my above statements, why did you choose that one? I am not stuck in defining spirituality as the dogmas of religion. But your answer seems to be...is that what you mean?
objects are a manifestation of the consciousness of the human mind. consciousness is a manifestation of Spirit/Soul of ultimate Reality...the real Source Energy of all. Until human mind finds/allows that full flow of ultimate consciousness connection with Source...learning to bi-locate in a balanced way of natural occurrence will not be found. But a disconnected imbalanced form of teleportation may.
I think our definitions of reality defer.
- sandra rinckposted 15 years ago0
Related Discussions
- 20
If you believe we are created in the image and likeness of God, do you believe w
If you believe we are created in the image and likeness of God, do you believe we should be like GodGrowing up through many different churches I was taught (by church leaders) not to question church leaders authority, to stay in your box and everything outside of that box shouldn't be looked upon....
- 202
Is Faith Required to Believe in Science of Creation?
Isn't it interesting that we don't know all the species on the earth that become extinct certainly by man's encroaching upon their environment but according to some so-called experts they know every single thing that took place during the so-called Big Bang. In the void between planets, star...
- 14
Why can't God and evolution coexist?
Why can't God and evolution coexist?I am curious about the division between the concept of evolution and the religious mind... why can't God and evolution coexist? What are the rules that define the scientific process of evolution? Can those rules be applied towards religious belief?
- 241
Updates to the new Hub design!
Hello everyone!Thanks so much for all the feedback you've provided regarding the new Hub design. We've taken it to heart and have rolled out two updates to the design:1. If you put your Hubs into a Group, the Hub featured in the top right sidebar will be the next Hub in that Group2. The footer will...
- 60
The Bible states that God created the Waters, but when did He do this?
The Bible states that God created the Waters, but when did He do this?If you notice in the book of Genesis Chapter 1 it does not state the day in which God created the waters within the 6 days of creation. Between verses 2 and 6 it implies that water already existed. However, throughout the bible...