landmark ruling on euthanasia

Jump to Last Post 1-3 of 3 discussions (6 posts)
  1. pisean282311 profile image60
    pisean282311posted 8 years ago

    Germany's Federal Court of Justice overturned the conviction of a lawyer who advised an elderly comatose woman's family to cut off her feeding tube, in a landmark ruling on euthanasia.

    The high-profile case involved 71-year-old Erika Kuellmer who slipped into a vegetative state after a cerebral haemorrhage in October 2002 and, confined to a nursing home, was fed through a tube for five years.

    Although Kuellmer had expressed the wish not to be kept alive under such circumstances, the home's management refused to let her die.

    On the advice of her lawyer, Kuellmer's daughter finally cut the feeding tube with a pair of scissors in the presence of her brother and Kuellmer died two days later of "natural causes", according to an autopsy.

    A lower court acquitted the daughter of killing her mother because she had "mistakenly" followed her lawyer's advice. The son committed suicide a few months after the death of his mother.

    Meanwhile the attorney, Wolfgang Putz, was convicted and given a nine-month suspended sentence.

    But the federal tribunal found that Putz, a prominent patients' rights advocate, had acted legally and in the patient's interest because she had clearly expressed her wish not to be kept alive artificially.

    "An improvement in her health condition was not to be expected," the court said in a statement on the ruling.

    "The expressed wish of the patient in September 2002, which her carers had approved and confirmed, was binding."

    A German law went into effect last September allowing patients to pre-determine which life-saving measures they would opt not to receive in a medical emergency.

    Chief justice Ruth Rissing-van Saan had said when agreeing to hear the case that the court aimed to define the line between "killing" and "natural death".

    "The expressed wishes of the patient... justified not only the end of treatment via the withholding of further nourishment but also the active step of ending or preventing the treatment she no longer wanted," the court said.

    The issue is particularly charged in Germany, where the Nazis cynically labelled a mass extermination programme for around 100,000 disabled people deemed unfit to live "euthanasia".

    Before the court, Putz had argued that Kuellmer's life was no longer worth living in the eyes of her family.

    Justice Minister Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger hailed the ruling as a victory for self-determination and dignity in death.

    "There may not be forced medical treatment against a person's will," she said.

    But patients' right organisations warned that Germans needed to be "crystal clear" in formulating their wishes.

    "Only clearly formulated living wills can be respected," Sonja Hecker of the German Association for Provision and Care Rights advised, to spare dying patients and their loved ones battles in court.

    1. fresnavee profile image52
      fresnaveeposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      It's funny, I remember reading a forum post linking to a news story about a man who was being kept alive by a pacemaker. He was essentially a vegetable and could not simply hav ethe life support device turned off. This seems like a similar story, except in Germany, not America.

      What bothers me in this is that the lawyer, form as far as I can tell, acted completely legally and according to the wishes of the patient.

    2. psycheskinner profile image82
      psycheskinnerposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      It seems to me that this is still in the territory of how hard to fight to keep people alive, not authanasia which is taking a direct action to stop life processes.

  2. profile image0
    Will Bensonposted 8 years ago

    Physician Assisted Suicide and/or Euthanasia are subjects that no politician wants to deal with and so antiquated laws, pre-dating modern science, still hold sway. We can spare our pets from an agonizing death, but not grandpa.

    Life and death decisions should be made jointly by the patient, the physician, and the family. The moral aspects of such a decision should be dealt with by the patient and the family.

    My thoughts, respectfully.

    1. lorlie6 profile image83
      lorlie6posted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Thanks Will, I totally agree.

  3. Ohma profile image74
    Ohmaposted 8 years ago

    There are just some things the government should not be involved in and end of life decisions made by patients is one of them. A person should always have the right to determine what measures can and can not be used to sustain their life. It should never be the decision of the courts.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)