|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
Is campaigning against building electric wind farms selfish?
campaigners against wind turbines for electric: Would you accept them if the companies offered to pay for sound proofing, and put up trees around them so you couldn't actually see them?
i would allow it ... if the sound proofing works. it's good for the environment and they would only choose a spot if they know the wind speeds are high and constant in that area.. so they are a bit restricted as to where to place the windfarms. they don't look ugly at all so trees don't matter.
I definitely wouldn't want to wake up every morning to a wind farm in front of me, and it could decrease the property value so I understand people's concerns. But at the same time it is a great alternative energy source. I understand why people would campaign against it and it's not really being selfish in my eyes but it's being smart, trying to save your house's value. Only way I'd accept the turbines being by me is if they could provide power to my house or something in the case that it would be ideal for me because I would have no electric bill then.
of course it is selfish. it's ok, i guess, to pollute the planet because most of us will be dead before it really does serious damage but these same people will say how much they care about our world. it drives me crazy when i see people boycot wind farms. we have them where i live and they are awesome. i wouldn't care if they were in my backyard, i do care if my grandchildren have air worth breathing when they get to be my age though.
Campaigning is fine, people are allowed to say and stand up for what they believe in. However wind farms will never generate enough power to support our power needs, they are expensive and only provide power when there is wind.
Data shows that each turbine meets the average annual electricity needs of 1,000 homes. Where a nuclear power station would generate 8,891 GW•h annually where a Wind turbine will create 5.3 GWh annually. So we would need 1678 wind turbines to replace one nuclear power station.
I don't think it is selfish, the sight of 1678 thousand wind turbines would be a bit much and ruin a large area of natural landscape.
I'm curious what manner of trees anyone thinks would be tall enough to conceal a wind turbine . While wind farms do take up a bit of space, they are excellent for energy and -- unlike nuclear plants -- do not pose a potential hazard to the world. I live in Wyoming, where we have a lot of land that can't be used for farming or anything else due to the lack of water and high clay content in the soil. However, we do have prevailing winds throughout much of the state. Here, wind farms have done very well. The space that has been used for them is still inhabited by local wildlife, and the farms have also created a number of jobs that pay much higher than the state average. Wind and water (hydroelectric) power the entire state and then some. There has also been a push recently for more solar power, and anyone who has done it for their homes and outbuildings have ended up with more than they need. They estimate that it will take about 5-8 years before the cost savings offsets the price of the panels, and most panels have an estimated life span of 30 years.
Is campaigning against wind farms selfish? Possibly, though I'm sure those that do have reasons that are very valid to them. The one thing that I would consider selfish would be to campaign against any type of natural power. Nuclear power may be efficient, but it has proven many, many times that it is not safe -- and when something goes wrong it rarely goes a little wrong, and in severe cases it may take a lot of lives with it and leave a vast radioactive wasteland where the plant used to be.
by CMHypno4 years ago
So do you think they are a good idea?http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthn … study.html
by Aya Katz5 years ago
Which alternative energy source is more efficient and cheaper to maintain: solar panels or windmills?
by Shil19786 years ago
Which renewable energy sources offer the most promise?
by GUINNESSBILL7 years ago
If the Government's of the World want to cut emissions why are they not developing mini wind turbine
by peterxdunn7 years ago
I am looking for feedback on an idea that I have developed for a new concept vertical axis wind turbine. If there is anyone from an engineering/design (nuts and bolts), architectural or computer aided design background...
by Marites Mabugat-Simbajon5 years ago
What’s the environmental impact between oil sands and wind farms?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.