sort by best latest
But how can something be 'neutral' if there are not two sides (good and evil) to be neutral to? The definition of neutral is as follows: Not helping or supporting either of two opposing sides
There are different degrees of 'good' which we would still be able to distinguish. Also, without evil neutrality would be the worst action. Feed 10 people good, 20 better, 0 worse. Evil isn't seen in any action but we can tell which is more good.....
- See all 2 commentsHide extra comments
Elliott Ploutz says
Child rapist and killer. What shade of good is that? Evil exists.
Agreed!!^^ I believe that good cannot exist without evil. There probably wouldn't even be the word 'good' in our dictionary. If we were, however, able to, "compare degrees of good" then we would not be able to fully appreciate what 'good' is.
Calynbana, a child rapist and killer's actions would be a very dark shade of gray. The outcomes of that person's actions is that he pleases himself, he feels good, that's a good thing. He got to the good thing in a very bad way, that's a bad thing...
- See all 3 commentsHide extra comments