Something from nothing?
huh?
Your first assumption is that Humankind came from nothing.
Which would be a lie. We know we came from something. What's not answered is where or how?
Your question "If so will that prove God exists?" - No! Because, as I said before.
Why do you assume that Humankind came from nothing?
Do you not understand science?
Just a thought.
Great some one else who understands Jesus words about man being god, thank you Seyiari.
Kess and you are god send
In my belief, God is what came from nothing. God created all else... (maybe created is the wrong word)...
I believe God is everything and nothing, those are the two sides to the coin of God.
I believe nothing existed and at some point everything existed. the only thing that can exist with nothing else (an opposite) is nothing.
(by everything I don't mean everything we have now, the original everything may have merely been a microbe...)
'before the beginning' there was only Nothing and nothing is the only absolute concept that can exist without an opposite.
Using numbers:
nothing is in the negative... everything is in the positve... 0 is the middle ground.
If we started with -100 0 +100 representing existence today...
the begining would be represented as 0.
Technically, if there is only Nothing, then Nothing=Everything, hence God is the Alpha and the Omega,... that which simply is...I am Who am...
{Which is another reason why I think a simple circle is a better symbol for the representative symbol of God.}
(maybe that is where the 'Halos' originated?)
I was being ironic
Nothing is a proof of God. Prove me something !
I think that demarcation and the explanation are made well by Lawrence Kraus.
'before the beginning' there was only Nothing and nothing is the only absolute concept that can exist without an opposite.
Using numbers:
nothing is in the negative... everything is in the positve... 0 is the middle ground.
If we started with -100 0 +100 representing existence today...
the begining would be represented as 0.
Technically, if there is only Nothing, then Nothing=Everything, hence God is the Alpha and the Omega,... that which simply is...I am Who am...
- thetruthhurts2009posted 14 years ago
0 - Twenty One Daysposted 14 years ago0
-
- Twenty One Daysposted 14 years ago0
I see, I think next you'll say -1, -2 etc. are nothing#1, nothing #2 and so on respectively
- Will Bensonposted 14 years ago0
Krauss said: "Forget Jesus! The stars died so YOU could be here today!"
That explains a lot
I love you more when you giggle
I like boxes. I like chocolatey pink bits too
No worries. Sorted
We dont know, we includes you?
So you don't know, you said it, we accept it.
Me, I do know but you wouldn't understand.
Nice doin businessThank You for Playing...
And since we know that Humans and Humanity could be wrong. That leaves Humans as the HIGHEST Life form we know and everything else is less.
So when you write those hubs you write where you say you do know and he is coming back, you are just lying then?
You know he made us and you know he is coming back.
The Baker?
Remember - 100% total lack of evidence may not be absolute proof - but it is a good indication.
Why do you need to do that?
Still - what is the lowest form of life? I presume you know this?
- Twenty One Daysposted 14 years ago0
milk and two, thanks
Is thank you for playing long hand for P*** off?
It seems he thinks he owns the thread
Nothing interesting in his posts anyway !True. He keeps going back in to this lower/higher life loop.
Could be a short circuit or a crook relay.
-
I think he's in the playground ! He found it at last !
Mark Knowles: "Still - what is the lowest form of life? I presume you know this? "
Mikel: "The more I think about this the more I suspect it may be God as well...
Everything being the highest positive
Nothing being the lowest positive(non-negative), but still something(this use of the word nothing will confuse ding dong
)
('God' by definition being something )
do you follow?
{negative numbers being the 'other side' of the God coin}"No - I am not following.
You are just assuming a god and making up nonsense to justify it. You are the one that is stating that there MUST be a higher form of life and you KNOW it is not anything we are aware of.
And the reason you keep stating is that if there is a lowest form there must be a highest.
I do not see or understand "lowest" or "highest" forms of life.
And neither do you apparently.
By the way bacteria has been around a helluva lot longer than a belief in invisible boogymen.
No question. I am not seeing this "lowest" form of life crap as anything other than yet another way of saying, "There must be a god because I cannot imagine there not being a god, therefore there is one."
Oh......... And I know He is coming back.
Ah geez.
If only my outside the house life were this entertainingWell then, you have come to the right place bc!
I'm sure!
I will be working close with police also. If I keep myself out of trouble, nose clean, I might even get a foot in with the police department.
BC that is a cool thing to do. I know the stats are bad, but each good person in the mix helps.
More power to you!Thanks you two
@earnest, you are an aussie, yes? You know much about perth?A little yes, my twin sister has lived there for a long time.
I am in Melbourne. I had heard. I commend you for doing this, those kids need a hand.
Thanks
again Thank You for Playing
LOL
Here is the maths:
2 options:
1. A god exists
2. A god does not exist
50/50 - so far.
1. Infinite numbers of possible gods
Therefor there is infinitely more chances that god does not exist than he (christian god - option number 2,999,887,928,668,464,776,377,487,990,465) has it right.
Out of a book.- and if infinity is the top end... then half of infinity belongs to the 50 percent that is on the there is a God side.
- shazwellynposted 14 years ago0
So ingratiating to my less than firm dance with reality cum deluded god like image of self
Here is the second episode of Discovery which has Lawrence Kraus explaining his theories. I posted the first episode some time back, but will find it if requested.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/p0 … ce_Krauss/In the immortal words of Jim Carrey, Ace Venture..."Well, alrighty....then!
- Smooth as Silkposted 14 years ago0
Stardust!
:
Amazing, we are all made of stars
And an eco system within.and the scale of particles and galaxies and universes.
Any wonder man went in to space. I have been really enjoying Professor Kraus's "Explorer" series on the BBC, he is so good at offering theory that can be understood by ordinary folk.
Related Discussions
- 47
Supernatual/Paranormal Occurences prove God is real?!
A friend and I had a conversation/discussion on this and she believes such occurrences are proof that God is real.She went on to say:If evil spirits are out there, there must be good spirits...like angels God is real.Equal and opposite reaction argument.While I understand her theory or reasoning on...
- 883
Believers Have to Prove the Existence of God
Many believers like to say that Atheists should prove that there is no God. Believers should know that existence has to be proved, not the non-existence. If a thing exists, it is possible to prove its existence. So believers should prove the existence of God if he exists. But if they want to do it,...
- 18
I refuse to prove that I exist, says God, for proof denies faith, and without fa
I refuse to prove that I exist, says God, for proof denies faith, and without faith I am nothing.But," says Man, "the Babel fish is a dead giveaway isn't it? It proves you exist, and so therefore, you don't," "Oh dear," says God, "I hadn't thought of that," and...
- 1184
Show me proof that God does not exist.
Atheists claim that God does not exist, show me the proof that backs up this claim.
- 579
The Burden of Proof is on Believers
The following post is in response to a statement made by another hubber and the many posts I've read using logical fallacies:"the burden of proof" is NOT on the believers. There is no burden to prove He exists because it is by FAITH that we believe. It is by faith we called on to believe....
- 56
What evidence would it take to convince you your religion is false?
This is a hypothetical question. If in fact whatever religion you happen to believe in was not true, what would it take to persuade you? Obviously, the more severe the charge, the more evidence we demand in order to accept it. For example, if your buddy told you he had Chinese for dinner last...