Democrats Request Vote to Axe Abortion in Health Care
84- Make Money
- 2297 posts
- Joined: 17 months ago
- Hubs: 9
- Fans: 121
Democrats Request Nancy Pelosi Allow Vote to Axe Abortion in Health Care
October 23, 2009
"Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Congressional pro-life Democrats have sent their third letter in recent months to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi asking that she allow a vote on an amendment to strike the abortion funding in HR 3200, the health care bills. Now, in total, 38 Democrats have requested such an amendment."
100- Mark Knowles
- 10497 posts
- Joined: 2 years ago
- Hubs: 264
- Fans: 2217
Make Money wrote:
Democrats Request Nancy Pelosi Allow Vote to Axe Abortion in Health Care
October 23, 2009
"Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Congressional pro-life Democrats have sent their third letter in recent months to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi asking that she allow a vote on an amendment to strike the abortion funding in HR 3200, the health care bills. Now, in total, 38 Democrats have requested such an amendment."So - a bunch of fascist christian hypocrites think they should be able to dictate what a women does with her body.
What is your point?
94- Jonathan Janco
- 397 posts
- Joined: 3 months ago
- Hubs: 17
- Fans: 39
Mark Knowles wrote:
Make Money wrote:
Democrats Request Nancy Pelosi Allow Vote to Axe Abortion in Health Care
October 23, 2009
"Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Congressional pro-life Democrats have sent their third letter in recent months to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi asking that she allow a vote on an amendment to strike the abortion funding in HR 3200, the health care bills. Now, in total, 38 Democrats have requested such an amendment."So - a bunch of fascist christian hypocrites think they should be able to dictate what a women does with her body.
What is your point?Probably the same congressmen who support the death penalty and take bribes from the death-dealing arms industry.
Do you think health care reform should involve federal funding for procedures performed for socio-economic rather than medical reasons?
87- Poppa Blues
- 1629 posts
- Joined: 15 months ago
- Hubs: 63
- Fans: 88
It's simple. The Constitution defends the rights of ALL INDIVIDUALS to the pursuit of happiness. Now that includes women, but at some point that fetus becomes an individual and as such deserves the protections granted it under the constitution.
82- A Texan
- 3227 posts
- Joined: 5 months ago
- Hubs: 42
- Fans: 147
Mark Knowles wrote:
Make Money wrote:
Democrats Request Nancy Pelosi Allow Vote to Axe Abortion in Health Care
October 23, 2009
"Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Congressional pro-life Democrats have sent their third letter in recent months to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi asking that she allow a vote on an amendment to strike the abortion funding in HR 3200, the health care bills. Now, in total, 38 Democrats have requested such an amendment."So - a bunch of fascist christian hypocrites think they should be able to dictate what a women does with her body.
What is your point?Now the Democrats are fascist, you are comical.
81- Madame X
- 1575 posts
- Joined: 7 months ago
- Hubs: 18
- Fans: 154
Funny how Pelosi gets to decide on what Congress may or may not address. Used to be any congressman could introduce any issue he deemed to be of importance to the American people.
- C.J. Wright
- 533 posts
- Joined: 3 months ago
- Hubs: 5
- Fans: 25
Mark Knowles wrote:
Make Money wrote:
Democrats Request Nancy Pelosi Allow Vote to Axe Abortion in Health Care
October 23, 2009
"Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Congressional pro-life Democrats have sent their third letter in recent months to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi asking that she allow a vote on an amendment to strike the abortion funding in HR 3200, the health care bills. Now, in total, 38 Democrats have requested such an amendment."So - a bunch of fascist christian hypocrites think they should be able to dictate what a women does with her body.
What is your point?Actually, I think they are questioning whether or not tax dollars should be used to pay for it.....
- 100
- Mark Knowles
- 10497 posts
- Joined: 2 years ago
- Hubs: 264
- Fans: 2217
C.J. Wright wrote:
Mark Knowles wrote:
Make Money wrote:
Democrats Request Nancy Pelosi Allow Vote to Axe Abortion in Health Care
October 23, 2009
"Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Congressional pro-life Democrats have sent their third letter in recent months to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi asking that she allow a vote on an amendment to strike the abortion funding in HR 3200, the health care bills. Now, in total, 38 Democrats have requested such an amendment."So - a bunch of fascist christian hypocrites think they should be able to dictate what a women does with her body.
What is your point?Actually, I think they are questioning whether or not tax dollars should be used to pay for it.....
The same tax dollars that are used to buy nukular weapons and invade Iraq and bail the banks out?
I see what you mean..... - 82
- A Texan
- 3227 posts
- Joined: 5 months ago
- Hubs: 42
- Fans: 147
Mark Knowles wrote:
C.J. Wright wrote:
Mark Knowles wrote:
So - a bunch of fascist christian hypocrites think they should be able to dictate what a women does with her body.
What is your point?Actually, I think they are questioning whether or not tax dollars should be used to pay for it.....
The same tax dollars that are used to buy nukular weapons and invade Iraq and bail the banks out?
I see what you mean.....
Comical - 100
- Mark Knowles
- 10497 posts
- Joined: 2 years ago
- Hubs: 264
- Fans: 2217
A Texan wrote:
Mark Knowles wrote:
Make Money wrote:
Democrats Request Nancy Pelosi Allow Vote to Axe Abortion in Health Care
October 23, 2009
"Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Congressional pro-life Democrats have sent their third letter in recent months to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi asking that she allow a vote on an amendment to strike the abortion funding in HR 3200, the health care bills. Now, in total, 38 Democrats have requested such an amendment."So - a bunch of fascist christian hypocrites think they should be able to dictate what a women does with her body.
What is your point?Now the Democrats are fascist, you are comical.
Now go look up the word "fascist." I think you will find it appropriate.
You shure r funny tho. Were you making a point as well? Because i lost it. - 82
- A Texan
- 3227 posts
- Joined: 5 months ago
- Hubs: 42
- Fans: 147
Mark Knowles wrote:
A Texan wrote:
Mark Knowles wrote:
So - a bunch of fascist christian hypocrites think they should be able to dictate what a women does with her body.
What is your point?Now the Democrats are fascist, you are comical.
Now go look up the word "fascist." I think you will find it appropriate.
You shure r funny tho. Were you making a point as well? Because i lost it.You can't lose what you never had.
What a joke! - 82
- A Texan
- 3227 posts
- Joined: 5 months ago
- Hubs: 42
- Fans: 147
Mark Knowles wrote:
A Texan wrote:
Mark Knowles wrote:
So - a bunch of fascist christian hypocrites think they should be able to dictate what a women does with her body.
What is your point?Now the Democrats are fascist, you are comical.
Now go look up the word "fascist." I think you will find it appropriate.
You shure r funny tho. Were you making a point as well? Because i lost it.Now say something about Christians
- C.J. Wright
- 533 posts
- Joined: 3 months ago
- Hubs: 5
- Fans: 25
Mark Knowles wrote:
C.J. Wright wrote:
Mark Knowles wrote:
So - a bunch of fascist christian hypocrites think they should be able to dictate what a women does with her body.
What is your point?Actually, I think they are questioning whether or not tax dollars should be used to pay for it.....
The same tax dollars that are used to buy nukular weapons and invade Iraq and bail the banks out?
I see what you mean.....Do you? It would seem that your logic only encourages wastefull spending. In other words if the government spends on something you disagree with then they MUST spend on something you agree with. Or even worse, no request for funding can be denied. To what end will that lead?
Again, they were only asking for a vote to amend funding. merely asking a question makes them facist?- C.J. Wright
- 533 posts
- Joined: 3 months ago
- Hubs: 5
- Fans: 25
Madame X wrote:
Funny how Pelosi gets to decide on what Congress may or may not address. Used to be any congressman could introduce any issue he deemed to be of importance to the American people.
Your right, although it normally takes more than one....however it apears there are 38. Seems more than enough to open a debate.
I hope American's of all political persuasions are paying close attention to all of this nonsense. Practically all of the sitting congress should get a hard look at re-election time.- 100
- Mark Knowles
- 10497 posts
- Joined: 2 years ago
- Hubs: 264
- Fans: 2217
C.J. Wright wrote:
Mark Knowles wrote:
C.J. Wright wrote:
Actually, I think they are questioning whether or not tax dollars should be used to pay for it.....The same tax dollars that are used to buy nukular weapons and invade Iraq and bail the banks out?
I see what you mean.....Do you? It would seem that your logic only encourages wastefull spending. In other words if the government spends on something you disagree with then they MUST spend on something you agree with. Or even worse, no request for funding can be denied. To what end will that lead?
Again, they were only asking for a vote to amend funding. merely asking a question makes them facist?yes. I see they do not question the money spent on corporations who supply weapons to the government Inc. I really suggest you guys go buy decent dictionaries and look up the word fascist. It might make communication somewhat easier.
Wasteful? Not sure how you came to that conclusion either. I was suggesting these are hypocritical scum bags who are quite happy to see as many dead Iraqi babies as it takes as long as Exxon makes a large profit, but have a"moral" opinion on spending tax money on abortion because ..... 
84- tksensei
- 5445 posts
- Joined: 7 months ago
- Hubs: 7
- Fans: 207
Mark Knowles wrote:
C.J. Wright wrote:
Mark Knowles wrote:
The same tax dollars that are used to buy nukular weapons and invade Iraq and bail the banks out?
I see what you mean.....Do you? It would seem that your logic only encourages wastefull spending. In other words if the government spends on something you disagree with then they MUST spend on something you agree with. Or even worse, no request for funding can be denied. To what end will that lead?
Again, they were only asking for a vote to amend funding. merely asking a question makes them facist?yes. I see they do not question the money spent on corporations who supply weapons to the government Inc. I really suggest you guys go buy decent dictionaries and look up the word fascist. It might make communication somewhat easier.
Wasteful? Not sure how you came to that conclusion either. I was suggesting these are hypocritical scum bags who are quite happy to see as many dead Iraqi babies as it takes as long as Exxon makes a large profit, but have a"moral" opinion on spending tax money on abortion because .....When bigotry, illogic, and hysterical far-left conspiracy nonsense collide: The Perfect Storm!
- 100
- Mark Knowles
- 10497 posts
- Joined: 2 years ago
- Hubs: 264
- Fans: 2217
tksensei wrote:
Mark Knowles wrote:
C.J. Wright wrote:
Do you? It would seem that your logic only encourages wastefull spending. In other words if the government spends on something you disagree with then they MUST spend on something you agree with. Or even worse, no request for funding can be denied. To what end will that lead?
Again, they were only asking for a vote to amend funding. merely asking a question makes them facist?yes. I see they do not question the money spent on corporations who supply weapons to the government Inc. I really suggest you guys go buy decent dictionaries and look up the word fascist. It might make communication somewhat easier.
Wasteful? Not sure how you came to that conclusion either. I was suggesting these are hypocritical scum bags who are quite happy to see as many dead Iraqi babies as it takes as long as Exxon makes a large profit, but have a"moral" opinion on spending tax money on abortion because .....When bigotry, illogic, and hysterical far-left conspiracy nonsense collide: The Perfect Storm!
That sounds like a personal attack to me.
- 84
- Make Money
- 2297 posts
- Joined: 17 months ago
- Hubs: 9
- Fans: 121
I don't think we should allow Mark to completely side track this thread like he has done to so many other threads.
The reason why I started it is to consider a universal health care plan if federal funding is not used for socio-economic reasons such as abortion or euthanasia.
What do you think?
Seeing there are so many people without health insurance in the US is it worth considering universal health care if it just deals with medical reasons? 
83- Friendlyword
- 254 posts
- Joined: 2 months ago
- Hubs: 5
- Fans: 25
Make Money wrote:
I don't think we should allow Mark to completely side track this thread like he has done to so many other threads.
The reason why I started it is to consider a universal health care plan if federal funding is not used for socio-economic reasons such as abortion or euthanasia.
What do you think?
Seeing there are so many people without health insurance in the US is it worth considering universal health care if it just deals with medical reasons?I wrote a great hub on this subject.
http://hubpages.com/hub/womenofcongressrevolt
