Aren't late night thoughts fun? Preliminary thoughts
Anyway, on to the point. Let's assume at the beginning of this discussion there is only "one universe," which happens to be the one humans currently inhabit. This universe is all there is (physically speaking). So, the universe would encompass all of physical reality; in fact, to speak more accurately, it would BE reality. The universe is synonymous with reality.
From this, some strange implications follow. For example, physicists tell us the universe is expanding, even at an accelerated rate! This means that reality is also expanding. If the oscillation model had been accurate, we could say reality would condense itself, and then expand itself again, forevermore. Imagine such a conception of reality!
Philosophers and great thinkers conceptualize perspective as "expanding" or "limited", but this is more of a metaphorical sense, not a literal one. What happens when we add multiple universes?
It wouldn't be accurate to speak of "multiple realities." What would be accurate is a fundamental conceptual change in how we think of reality itself, and a change in the definition of a universe. Before, we could simply define the universe as "total reality," but with multiple universes, that's no longer the case, especially when other universes are vastly different from our own.
A new definition of a universe and reality must fully capture modern scientific breakthroughs. Perhaps it could be something such as, "an aspect of reality that contains planets, galaxies, stars, and is connected to a 'web' of universes." Reality now is defined as an infinite (?) web of universes mysteriously connected. Under this conception, human beings are not even blindly poking a part of the elephant; we are poking an infinitely large elephant that can never be scaled.
At the centre of which is only oneself and ones view from their little perch in the said multi-verses.
I forgot I posted this discussion! I was aiming for some dialogue and clarity, but no one responded, until now.
You're correct that we would be a speck inside of one universe, which was part of a universe ensemble. Multiverse theory hasn't been completely accepted yet, so this discussion was all speculation.
But imagining we are on our little perch in a multiverse would be enough to give me extreme humility.
by Austinstar5 years ago
Most people I talk to have a concept of the universe as a fixed amount of space with some sort of boundary surrounding it. Some people believe God lives beyond this "boundary".Please explain why you believe...
by God shet2 years ago
What is the smallest 'thing' in the universe, currently? Well, it's 'quarks'. Now the question is: What are 'quarks' made of? Is it true that 'quarks' are made of even smaller particles? Then, what are those...
by Csaba Bebesai4 years ago
Does the Universe have an ending? Can you explain?
by emrldphx5 years ago
For those who are interested, I am putting together a primer on the difference between subjectivity and objectivity. Much of the disagreement in this forum is due to confusion between the two. We'll start with a...
by Alexander A. Villarasa2 years ago
We all agree that no two snowflakes are alike, when viewing its variegated intricately complex design. One could analogize it to the similarly intricate/complex design of the cosmos. String theory proposes the existence...
by David Bowman5 weeks ago
Warning: This thread is intended as a serious discussion for those interested in philosophy. Posts that attempt to proselytize or derail the discussion with an unrelated subject matter will not receive a response from...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.