Why raising taxes on corporations is BAD

Jump to Last Post 51-89 of 89 discussions (330 posts)
  1. profile image0
    Leta Sposted 10 years ago

    Ralph, you are funnnnny.  Kinda wondered about you...

  2. profile image0
    Leta Sposted 10 years ago

    Agree entirely with Lifebydesign.

    Things are more complicated than meet the eye, but agree with you, too, Misha!  That's why I did not want him banned from Hubpages.

  3. Misha profile image66
    Mishaposted 10 years ago

    LOL Louise, you should take a look at his early threads - he was a total troll. Only Lita kept talking to him - and this is in that sense that I meant he is her creation smile

    1. profile image0
      Leta Sposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      Let's just say I saw a couple things, lol!  But I'm sure he is entirely (well, almost) his own creation...

      Total agreement all the time would be 'utopia' and I'd probably get bored, smile.

      1. Lifebydesign profile image62
        Lifebydesignposted 10 years agoin reply to this

        Hi Lita, there is something about him that makes you engage rather um, passionately with him. lol. Boring you guys sure aren't. :-)

        1. profile image0
          Leta Sposted 10 years agoin reply to this

          LOL.  Yeah.  Am as I am... 

          He's not completely stupid as the uh, opposition--that's always good.    smile

  4. Lifebydesign profile image62
    Lifebydesignposted 10 years ago

    Hey Misha, yeh I read thru them. I don't get the troll bit although he makes a strong arguement.  But enough about him as you say. :-)

  5. Ralph Deeds profile image65
    Ralph Deedsposted 10 years ago

    I'm under the impression that Lita's actually attracted to more mature men! :-)

  6. profile image0
    sandra rinckposted 10 years ago

    I was sorta thinking Lita and Nick had a romantic connection.  Like opposites attract! lol

    1. BDazzler profile image77
      BDazzlerposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      ROFL!

    2. Sufidreamer profile image82
      Sufidreamerposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      Imagine the Oprah show about that one! - "True Love - We met on Hubpages"

      I have only ever known married couples argue that much. wink

  7. Misha profile image66
    Mishaposted 10 years ago

    LOL I love the turn this thread took smile

    1. profile image0
      sandra rinckposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      lol and neither wish to comment.  hmm....I wonder why?  smile

      1. Mark Knowles profile image60
        Mark Knowlesposted 10 years agoin reply to this

        Well, nicky is a well-known troll and I have even had people sending me photos of what he really looks like. Not sure why, I gave up responding to his baits after the first couple proved to be just that.

        He sure hooked lita though big_smile

        1. profile image0
          sandra rinckposted 10 years agoin reply to this

          well hook up the pics!  These people must have sent you the pics so if you see him on the streets you would be sure to avoid him. lol

    2. Sufidreamer profile image82
      Sufidreamerposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      A wonderful fairytale - "The Liberal Beauty and the Neo-Con Beast" smile

      I hope you all realise that we are dead once Lita reads this - I am going to blame Sandra for everything. wink

      1. BDazzler profile image77
        BDazzlerposted 10 years agoin reply to this

        I figure we can blame it on Nick, since she's already willing to kill him.

        1. profile image0
          sandra rinckposted 10 years agoin reply to this

          Kill him nothing, she loooooovvvveeeesssss hhiiimmmmm, muah, muah, muah, smootchie, smootchie. 
          lol.  smile

          1. BDazzler profile image77
            BDazzlerposted 10 years agoin reply to this


            "And Man knows it! Knows, moreover, that the Woman that God gave him
                Must command but may not govern—shall enthral but not enslave him.
                And She knows, because She warns him, and Her instincts never fail,
                That the Female of Her Species is more deadly than the Male. "
            - Runyard Kipling

            1. profile image0
              sandra rinckposted 10 years agoin reply to this

              you are talking about blank widows right? lol smile

              1. BDazzler profile image77
                BDazzlerposted 10 years agoin reply to this

                Our good friend RK was speaking of humans smile

      2. profile image0
        sandra rinckposted 10 years agoin reply to this

        me!!!  Mr. Deed's started it. lol.

        But I would like to please the 5th if Lita reads this.

  8. Misha profile image66
    Mishaposted 10 years ago

    Cause they are busy with more important things? wink

    1. profile image0
      sandra rinckposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      oh yes, Nick is off taking away womens rights and Lita is behind him cutting of his....

      1. Misha profile image66
        Mishaposted 10 years agoin reply to this

        ROFLMAO

        I thought along different lines though smile

        And yes Sufi, we are risking our lives here - but wasn't it you who started all this mess? wink

        1. Sufidreamer profile image82
          Sufidreamerposted 10 years agoin reply to this

          hmm You can't prove anything - circumstantial evidence.......

          Can I plea bargain?

          1. Misha profile image66
            Mishaposted 10 years agoin reply to this

            I can't decide for Lita... smile

            1. Sufidreamer profile image82
              Sufidreamerposted 10 years agoin reply to this

              I just want to remain anatomically intact. hmm

              1. Mark Knowles profile image60
                Mark Knowlesposted 10 years agoin reply to this

                If it is any consolation - you only need one testicle. Just look at Lance Armstrong big_smile

                1. Sufidreamer profile image82
                  Sufidreamerposted 10 years agoin reply to this

                  That may be the plea bargain I enter - only one. hmm

                  1. Mark Knowles profile image60
                    Mark Knowlesposted 10 years agoin reply to this

                    Left - or right?............

  9. Misha profile image66
    Mishaposted 10 years ago

    LOL I just meant women don't know between left and right tongue

  10. Misha profile image66
    Mishaposted 10 years ago

    Sorta physically attached? I guess every male is wink

    1. profile image0
      sandra rinckposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      No, I have seen some things that I really wish some certain friend of mine would neglect to share with me as he often thinks it is funny when I almost gag and yell turn that "   " off! 

      not all men are as attached to their pieces.  now that is scary!  smile

      1. BDazzler profile image77
        BDazzlerposted 10 years agoin reply to this

        Are you really talking about a prosthetic ... whateiver?

        1. profile image0
          sandra rinckposted 10 years agoin reply to this

          Oh dear Lord I wish I were....I wish I were.  Um...

          1. BDazzler profile image77
            BDazzlerposted 10 years agoin reply to this

            Never mind, I've decided I don't want to know.

            1. profile image0
              sandra rinckposted 10 years agoin reply to this

                Good choice, I am still looking for a magic mind eraser syrum myself.  sad

  11. Misha profile image66
    Mishaposted 10 years ago

    keep talinkg, keep talking, keep talki...

    1. profile image0
      sandra rinckposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      your dirty!!! lol tongue

  12. Misha profile image66
    Mishaposted 10 years ago

    As you say My Goddess smile

  13. Misha profile image66
    Mishaposted 10 years ago

    I guess we need enough posts to get to the next page, for efficient covering up smile

    So yes, I am with Sandy on this, taxes in any form do not get my vote, and this one is no exception smile

  14. BDazzler profile image77
    BDazzlerposted 10 years ago

    OK, I got a way to get this back on track, speaking of wine, bear etc ...  ... I'm going to blatently cut and paste from wikipedia ...

    The Whiskey Rebellion, less commonly known as the Whiskey Insurrection, was a popular uprising that had its beginnings in 1791 and culminated in an insurrection in 1794 in the locality of Washington, Pennsylvania, in the Monongahela Valley. The rebellion was the result of tax imposed on whiskey. The rebellion occurred shortly after the Articles of Confederation had been replaced by a stronger federal government under the American Constitution in 1789.

    ...

    This marked the first time under the new United States Constitution that the federal government used military force to exert authority over the nation's citizens. It was also one of only two times that a sitting President personally commanded the military in the field; the other was after President James Madison fled the British occupation of Washington, D.C. during the War of 1812.

    The military suppression of the Whiskey Rebellion set a precedent that U.S. citizens who wished to change the law had to do so peacefully through constitutional means; otherwise, the government would meet any threats to disturb the status quo with force.

    The suppression of the Whiskey Rebellion also had the unintended consequences of encouraging small whiskey producers in Kentucky and Tennessee, which remained outside the sphere of Federal control for many more years. In these frontier areas, they also found good corn-growing country as well as limestone-filtered water and therefore began making whiskey from corn; this corn whiskey developed into Bourbon.

    ...

    So with all the blaming of our immediately previous George W.  The REAL culprit on taxes is the FIRST George W ...

    Who just happened to own his own distillery ...

  15. Mark Knowles profile image60
    Mark Knowlesposted 10 years ago

    Hmmmmm Bourbon.....

    1. Sufidreamer profile image82
      Sufidreamerposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      mmmmm. Whisky.... tongue

      1. Mark Knowles profile image60
        Mark Knowlesposted 10 years agoin reply to this

        Haven't been able to even stand the smell of whisky since a childhood experiment with scotch and aspirin.

        Couldn't keep anything down for ten days......

        1. Sufidreamer profile image82
          Sufidreamerposted 10 years agoin reply to this

          I have the same problem with vodka - I thought that I was hard and could drink a whole bottle. Never again.

          1. profile image0
            sandra rinckposted 10 years agoin reply to this

            wow and I happen to love whiskey and or bourbon but can't stand gagermeister or tequilla for the same reasons though I did happen to drink a bottle of vodka once but never again!

            1. Sufidreamer profile image82
              Sufidreamerposted 10 years agoin reply to this

              Anyway, off to bed - say hi to Lita and Nick for me. wink

              1. profile image0
                Leta Sposted 10 years agoin reply to this

                Sufi, you oughta be ashamed. lol  And here I was saying you were a peacemaker, etc., etc...

  16. profile image0
    Leta Sposted 10 years ago

    Oh. My. God.  You guys!  Ya didn't cover it up well enough...

    It seems I have acquired a reputation at Hubpages, and now I am soooo, sooo ashamed.  (Why is it ALWAYS the woman??)  smile  And I must say, you all make a lovely 4 or 5-some yourselves with your very OVERT banter.

    And for the record, Ralph has it right, lol--I prefer my men real & a little more on the mature and liberal side. 

    Understand, also, Mr. Nick has a very nice girlfriend, even if he does come off as a troll!

    1. profile image0
      sandra rinckposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      sure, you are now my favorite liberal!  Misha is my favorite anarchist and saint, Mark is my favorite atheist, BDaz is my favorite Jesus message teacher preacher, Sufi is my favorite Greek-ian, TK is my favorite pessismist, Knowyourself is my favorite one liner, Eng M is my favorite muslim, Mo is my favorite poet, LG is my favorite rebell, Mike is my favorite catholic, SJ is my favorite astro-spiritual speaker, RFox is my favorite buddhist but she isn't around much anymore, RockinJoe is my favorite comedian and GmaJohnson is just sweet as pie love her hugs!...

      and all because they have certain things in common, they are all good people.  smile

      1. BDazzler profile image77
        BDazzlerposted 10 years agoin reply to this

        Awww ... Sandy ... Shucks! Thanks! [Big Hug]

        1. profile image0
          sandra rinckposted 10 years agoin reply to this

          your welcome hugs back, did you get the message I sent?  I sent it to your msn account.  smile

          1. BDazzler profile image77
            BDazzlerposted 10 years agoin reply to this

            Just checked it.  Will reply soon.

  17. Lifebydesign profile image62
    Lifebydesignposted 10 years ago

    Sandra you're pretty good people yourself, and apparently you're also a Goddess! :-)

    1. profile image0
      Leta Sposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      Yes, thanks for pointing that one out, ahem!

      1. profile image0
        sandra rinckposted 10 years agoin reply to this

        LOL, I pay Misha to say that...has it caught on? LOL.  ROTFLMAO!  no really, thanks LBD, so are you!  xoxoxo

  18. profile image0
    Leta Sposted 10 years ago

    Yah, OK, Sandra, lol...

    But you gotta keep order among these guys, you know.. If me or Pgrundy or MM or Kerryg are not around.....

    You KNOW how they are,  smile

    1. profile image0
      sandra rinckposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      Well I usually leave it to me saying something completly off the wall and they all leave!  smile lol. like roaches in the light.  hahahaahahahha.

  19. Misha profile image66
    Mishaposted 10 years ago

    LOL http://hubpages.com/forum/topic/3289 for those who were not around at ancient times. Enjoy smile

    1. profile image0
      sandra rinckposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      oh yes, the four fold gods!  I nearly forgot, where is Jenny anyways?

    2. profile image0
      Leta Sposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      Ha, Misha!  And don't think I don't know how YOU are either.  Shame, smile.

      1. Misha profile image66
        Mishaposted 10 years agoin reply to this

        LOL Lita, no matter how hard I try, I can't decipher what you said...

        1. profile image0
          sandra rinckposted 10 years agoin reply to this

          you like girls!  smile

          1. profile image0
            Leta Sposted 10 years agoin reply to this

            Unanimously noticed! smile

  20. Misha profile image66
    Mishaposted 10 years ago

    She doesn't come down too often nowadays, guess she is too busy over there on Olympus smile

  21. profile image0
    Leta Sposted 10 years ago

    That's OK....!    Just...you and the ladies, Misha.  I've noticed...  smile

  22. Misha profile image66
    Mishaposted 10 years ago

    Oh, thanks you girls! And yes, I love you smile

  23. TheMoneyGuy profile image69
    TheMoneyGuyposted 10 years ago

    I can't believe I spent an hour catching up on this thread.  LOL.

    That is why I like this place.

    TMG

    1. kerryg profile image82
      kerrygposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      LOL, me too

  24. Misha profile image66
    Mishaposted 10 years ago

    Hope you had some giggles along the way smile

  25. profile image0
    Leta Sposted 10 years ago

    And yet you still reply....Those were NOT generalities spoken to Pam, Nick?  "I want to be obscenely rich..."  And that she sees from a poverty perspective?  Sounds not like a generality, but like empty tin.  Know her?  Read her work?  Or is that just a lot of hot air for you to target someone to keep your paradigm of 'conservative' going?

    I think understanding emotion, etc., may just be needed skills in the courtroom and if you don't understand that, you may be at a loss.  Hmmm, think Obama understood that.

    You insult everybody who disagrees with you..it has little to do with real ideas or relative theory.  Ya wanna stop sometime?  And no, you are not that fascinating--intelligent, in a kind of brittle way, but hardly what I'd call fascinating.  I did use the term annoying, I believe.

    And it does not seem that the popular mood here on hubpages or within the country in general is exactly proving your point that 'conservativism' will prevail...  I do not and will not output fluency on any ideas or issues until I feel like it and I have the time.  I have books to write and my own fortune to worry about, ie.  But of course, that is a knowledge element--people as people instead of symbols for your railing--that you refuse.

    1. Nickny79 profile image69
      Nickny79posted 10 years agoin reply to this

      And yet you have the time to write pages lambasting me.  That's "brittle" alibi if I ever saw one....All rhetoric and fluff.  Hey you should write an op-ed for the NY Times!  I bet what's-his-name will link you on the forum and save you the trouble of responding to time.  lol

  26. Misha profile image66
    Mishaposted 10 years ago

    LOL Her we go again lol

    Where was my pop-corn though?

    1. Lifebydesign profile image62
      Lifebydesignposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      lol

      Butter or salt Misha?

      1. profile image0
        Leta Sposted 10 years agoin reply to this

        LOL LBD....

        I think I'm done here. 

        Unless he says something so repulsive I have to verbally smack him. 

        You go for it TMG....I know you are not an evil neocon & you're male, so he MAY hear you.

  27. TheMoneyGuy profile image69
    TheMoneyGuyposted 10 years ago

    Making a Beer run Misha want me to pick some up for ya?

    TMG

  28. Nickny79 profile image69
    Nickny79posted 10 years ago

    No worries, honey.  I understand you're a working-gal.  wink

    1. profile image0
      Leta Sposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      No, that's you.  I'll bet the ladies--and who knows, guys--of the upper east side get a work out whenever you're around.  Wig and all.  LOL

      Sorry!  You shouldn't even try within this realm, wink

      1. Nickny79 profile image69
        Nickny79posted 10 years agoin reply to this

        I'm a little frightened how you have the details of my hubs and my life committed to memory.  Yet a basic argument in favor of the Right to an Abortion you cannot give unless somehow it involves attacking me.  Apparently, this is the only "realm" you function in...You're a hub stalker...creepy, creepy....

        1. BDazzler profile image77
          BDazzlerposted 10 years agoin reply to this

          Aww...you two are SO Sweet! big_smile big_smile big_smile

          (Sorry couldn't help it!)

        2. profile image0
          Leta Sposted 10 years agoin reply to this

          Cannot let you have the last word, you know...

          When I write and think, I obliterate the competition, Nicky.  Only way to do it.  Especially on things like the freedom of choice--which incidentally, was a debate I considered at a high school level that I was drawn into by a little cyber troll in a wig, lol.

          And doubt I've ever seen you on the upper east side--that was a line I remembered and stole from hubpages own MM.

          And let us not utter a word about hub creeps....!  wink    Now go play lawyer for the day...

  29. profile image0
    Leta Sposted 10 years ago

    You're losing your touch.  That wasn't really repulsive enough...

    I'm sure you know (but then again given the way you think, maybe you don't) that there is stuff you can write pretty easily--like ad copy and lol, lambastic responses to you--and there is real stuff.  Like NYC Op Ed pieces that win Nobel prizes, books, poetry, or even grant proposal legalese crap (even if that is one dimensional & brittle verbally)

    You're just jealous of others' skills.

    By the way, your last sentence makes no apparent sense.  Essay content C-, mechanics, C.

  30. Nickny79 profile image69
    Nickny79posted 10 years ago

    Is there anyone here who can, with specificity, present a summary of the contents of Obama's Stimulus Bill?

  31. Nickny79 profile image69
    Nickny79posted 10 years ago

    Nancy is saying Nancy wants to kill babies to save money.

  32. Nickny79 profile image69
    Nickny79posted 10 years ago
    1. profile image0
      sandra rinckposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      how bout give me a link where I can see for myself Nancy saying that she wants to kill babies to save money, then I will believe you.  smile

      1. Nickny79 profile image69
        Nickny79posted 10 years agoin reply to this



        It is all over the internet.  If you need help finding it with google, I'm sure Mr. Knowles can assist you.  wink

        1. BDazzler profile image77
          BDazzlerposted 10 years agoin reply to this

          BTW As of this morning, that part of the bill, as well as the re-sodding of the capitol mall has been dropped.

          Here's a link like the one sandy asks for:
          http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.vi … geId=87268

          BTW Obama was against it.

  33. profile image0
    sandra rinckposted 10 years ago

    Well I looked at it, I read it, I watched it but I didn't hear anything about killing babies or abortion. 

    She talked about spending tarp money on contraceptives to reduce the cost of unexpected expenses such as babies. 

    Maybe there is something else I missed but doesn't look like she said any such thing about killing babies to save money.

    Also, Obama is pro-choice but against funding for planned parenthood because it is not a political issue, it private and personal. 

    And Obama does make more sense, that our tax money shouldn't be going to pay for abortions or contreceptives and I see where he is going with it. 

    He saying that funding could go to medicade and such for family planning, to make more jobs and they can in turn fund whomever they want like planned parenthood, but it is not a political issue. 

    I totally agree.

  34. profile image0
    sandra rinckposted 10 years ago

    Oh, did ya'll hear the latest! 

    Just in yesterday.  Florida gets smacked by a freak hurricane, tears their land up! 
    Guess what...sorry I chuckle as I write because it is just too much.

    No more insurance.  There primary insurance broker went belly up and can't pay, so those people are screwed.  What is worse is that they are still paying for it and their insurers are going to sell their customers to other insurance people....

    1. BDazzler profile image77
      BDazzlerposted 10 years agoin reply to this
      1. profile image0
        sandra rinckposted 10 years agoin reply to this

        yes but the cnn report yesterday was a bit different.  Saying something along the lines that some of those people insured with them wont be recieving their payments.

    2. profile image0
      Leta Sposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      Yeah, Sandra...

      Insurance is kind of unethical, just plainly.  House insurance, ie, is sometimes just a scam--they don't like to pay anything.  Ie--and this really happened--after a small house fire, the insurance company my sister had was GOING TO SUE her as they tried to implicate her in the scenario of how it was set.

      1. Ralph Deeds profile image65
        Ralph Deedsposted 10 years agoin reply to this

        Very true. If your house burns down or suffers major damage you need to get a lawyer in order to collect. This was true even they were going broke.

  35. profile image0
    issues veritasposted 10 years ago

    Why raising taxes on corporations is BAD

    How would we know, we never do it?
    Years ago, the Congress through revisions to the tax code, eliminated most of the deductions available to the people. They lowered the income tax rate the year they removed these deductions and then raised the rates the next year. It was a Congressional magic trick, one year you have deductions then next year you don't.

    The point here is that they didn't do this trick with corporations. Executives at many corporations live the large life spending money behind corporate tax deductions. They have corporate jets, yachts, limousines, expensively decorated offices, company cars, golf club memberships, expense accounts for what many would consider personal use, and many other corporate deductions. These are the remnants of the good old boys way of doing business but times have changed and they should eliminate that form of business.

    The cost of these deductions are passed on to the consumers in higher prices. In addition, because of the reduction in taxes paid by the corporations the government feels compelled to tax the people for the difference.

    I see that most of you think raising corporate taxes is bad, but what do you think about reforming the existing taxes with eliminating many of the loophole deductions? I can hear the knee jerk retort now, that will stifle business and corporations will lose revenue. I call this good business and it rewards those corporations that have a superior product that does what it is advertised to do. Marketeers sell the sizzle and not the steak, but a steak that is good tasting and affordable sell itself. My point is that market techniques push the envelope to sell poor products. They are the biggest users of loophole deductions.

    Cleanup corporate business practices and you will get an all around benefit including more tax revenue and better products at a lower price.

    A better solution to the tax issue is to simplify the tax code to eliminate loopholes used only by the rich. Replacing income tax with sales tax would reduce the overhead of the government to oversee the complex ever changing tax code. The IRS could be reduced by using the sales tax mechanism found in most states to simply collect an additional tax on sales.

    Sales tax is fair as long as necessary basic products are exempt to not penalize the poor. A person buying a $300,000 car would pay the same percentage as a person buying a $20,000 car. Sales tax is paid daily as it is received and that is a better system than waiting for tax dates. I feel another retort coming, there will be evasive methods used to buy high ticket items out of the country. This already exists and it is the burden of the government to close those loopholes.

    Income taxes are a mechanism to allow the government to invade your privacy without due process. You are forced under penalty of perjury to be a witness against yourself by being forced to include any illegal activity that generated revenue. If you kill someone you have the right of the 5th Amendment's protection against self incrimination but not in hiding money. Al Capone got convicted of tax evasion not for being a mobster or for his criminal activity.

    Isn't there a connection between the rich and corporations in paying little or no taxes?

    1. Nickny79 profile image69
      Nickny79posted 10 years agoin reply to this

      On the contrary, we have the highest corporate taxes in the world.  Part of the reason why there is such an exodus of manfuacturing from the US is because of the exorbitant corporate tax rate.



      Cite the specific years, the specific law (please provide the USC title and section) and the specific deductions you are referring to.  I think you are referring to a Clinton era "tax cut."



        Why do you care how other people spend money?  Are you jealous?  Don't you know that this sort of consumption STIMULATES the economy.  Who do you think makes these jets, yachts, limos, office furniture, cars, golf clubs and balls and golf courses?  Who do you think benefits from expeditures from expense accounts?  Do you know why restaurants and department stores are going out of business in NYC?  It doesn't take a genius to connect the dots.  Why does your reasoning stop short of the "large life" and not consider where this money flows?  Your statements only demonstrate your economic ignorance and class envy.



        Most people don't even PAY income taxes in the United States.  And receive all of their withholding back in a tax refunds!!  Most of the income taxes in this nation are shouldered by the top earners and redistributed to the rest of the nation.  Homework assignment:  Find on the web what tax bracket produces the highest percentage of income tax receipts.  What tax bracket produces the lowest. 



      Forget about loopholes, I think there should be no corporate tax AT ALL.



      This is not a knee jerk retort--it's elementary economics.  JOBS ARE LOST WHEN CORPORATION LOSE REVENUE.





      Cleanup corporate business practices and you will get an all around benefit including more tax revenue and better products at a lower price.

        Cleanup gov't and elimintate bureaucracies and maybe we won't need to tax people so much.  It's infuriating to hear how gov't waste money at every level.  It costs the state of New Jersey 10 times more to build a mile of road than it would cost a private company.  This is notorious example which exemplifies the wide-spread inefficiencies of gov't.[b]



      [b]  The "rich" are the only who pay taxes.  Loopholes are a mute point if you don't pay anything to begin with.




        I agree, there should be no income tax whatsoever and I think a sales tax would be more fair.  You will see this was discussed at length earlier in the thread.



        No.  There is a connection between irresponsible spending by gov't bureaucracies and high, punishing taxes.

      1. profile image0
        issues veritasposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  36. britneydavidson profile image60
    britneydavidsonposted 10 years ago

    i am agree with you...government is the main player in all this things so it is good if we have democracy then choose the right person..

  37. Nickny79 profile image69
    Nickny79posted 10 years ago

    Thank you for that amazing insight.  wink

  38. profile image0
    Leta Sposted 10 years ago

    As you like it!  wink  I'm sure even your tax ideas would be palatable.

  39. LibertyUnchained profile image60
    LibertyUnchainedposted 10 years ago

    As near as I can tell, corporations do not pay taxes anywise.

    Meaning that whatever taxes are levied upon corporations are taken out of the little guys pocket. Why would they take taxes out of their own pockets when they could instead simply take them from the potential wages of those that work for them?

    No matter what road you follow, the way our taxes are being enforced is designed to eliminate the middle class and keep everyone but the rich in a state of poverty.

    The taxes a corporation does not pass on to its "employees" are passed on to the public in the form of higher costs. No matter what, it is the average man or woman who pays for everything.

    Any corporation that actually just ate the taxes, kept their prices the same, and raised its employees wages to keep up with the government inflating the currency ( inflation ) would be closing its doors quite quickly.

    We could eliminate the income tax tomorrow by reducing the government to the size it was only twenty years ago.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)