Is social media company Facebook and internet search engine Google "too big to fail"?
Recent revelations about FB and Google are very troubling in the least. Their objectivity is in question? The question for the consumer is, are they too big to fail? or they are in danger of losing their dominance? Competition brings out the best...
I think no company, for that matter no country, is ever too big to fail. Look at Nokia, 10 years ago they practically were synonymous with handphones. FB and G might be larger, but given enough mistakes, they would also fall. Only thing is, they might be wealthy/influential enough to slow the decline. Or in the process of decline, manage to reverse the downturn.
Remember that My Space was the big one before FB.
Alta Vista, WebCrawler and others preceded Google.
The thing that may cause a change today, is that both of them invade our privacy, and if an adequate social site, and search engine that doesn't invade out privacy might trigger a change.
We seem to be creating new generations of people that don't care about their privacy, and think that bad things only happen to other people. It is bad enough that the US government spies on everyone, not just the bad guys. They even didn't balk at what should have been an unconstitutional passing of the Patriot Act, as this act should have required a declared war.
So in my opinion, the Achilles Heel of FB and Google is Privacy.
I agree privacy and what they choose to do with that personal data. What is worst for Google and Facebook is if they cross the line of impartiality when it comes to their products. Their customers expect nothing less. No one likes being deceived.
Addressing the main question I don't think Facebook will follow the lines of MySpace anytime soon. The key from peeking around is if they keep up with the trends for mobile usage with their platform and apps they will remain dominate a long time.
Google is simply mind boggling to me. They are the leader and dominant regard search engines market shares. All there statistics are mind boggling.
I looked at these resources for anyone to peek at it if interested:
Global social media research summary 2016 by Smart Insights
http://www.smartinsights.com/social-med … -research/
Marketing: 96 Amazing Social Media Statistics and Facts for 2016 by BrandWatch (Note: There are Google Stats here too. One amazing fact is Google uses 0.01% of worldwide electricity.)
https://www.brandwatch.com/2016/03/96-a … -for-2016/
Worldwide desktop market share of leading search engines from January 2010 to January 2016 by Statista
http://www.statista.com/statistics/2165 … h-engines/
(Note: There are a multitude of links to internet statistics at this site from usage by country to advertising revenue to posts per minute at Social Media sites. For instance at 347,222 tweets per minute.)
I discovered one interesting article by Forbes regard Facebook and Google failing. The article 'Here's Why Google and Facebook Might Completely Disappear in the Next 5 Years' written 2012 points out contrast with management type. It also points out it may be related to generational differences of users regard the transition of the internet from Web 1.0 → Web 2.0 → Mobile.
It states, "With each succeeding generation in tech the Internet, it seems the prior generation can’t quite wrap its head around the subtle changes that the next generation brings." It hints at users and the industry. It at that time questions why Google and Amazon have not made the transition to the social market. Pehaps that is why so many algorithm changes these most recent years? Penguin hit the web 2012. Comparing 2010 to 2014 mobile skyrocketed at 394%. An interesting point is that 21% of Millennials do not use a desktop preferring Mobile.
For me it is revealing how I may view writing articles today and what articles to write regard traffic. I may have to change as pointed out by that Forbes article.
They are not objective. Google is censoring ads by gun companies and payday lenders, legal products, because of its own biases. However, due to the sheer volume of internet traffic and content it controls, treating it as a utility that has to be unbiased would be appropriate.
Facebook is censoring conservative members and groups. This wouldn't be bad if that was part of the rules of the site, but they say they are neutral. And then they do things that are clearly biased - which is a violation of their word. Plus there is the sheer degree of it.
Facebook Censors Swedish Story About Rapes by Muslim Refugees
http://www.mrctv.org/blog/facebook-cens … m-refugees
Trump supporter BLOCKED by Facebook for complaining about site's censorship of right-wing activists
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article … z4ASJRkbdZ
Facebook censors Michael Savage post of Muslims protesting
http://www.wnd.com/2015/12/facebook-cen … LMgc2JT.99
Media Ignoring a MAJOR Part of the Facebook Scandal
http://www.mrctv.org/blog/mainstream-me … ok-scandal
Includes censorship of smaller conservative groups and individuals
by Will Apse 4 years ago
'To the best of Matt’s (Cutts) knowledge, there are currently no signals in the ranking algorithms that put any weight on how many Facebook likes or Twitter followers a specific page has.'http://www.searchenginejournal.com/matt … lly/87277/Drive traffic okay. Forget organic search rankings.
by kkinfy 7 years ago
Avoid self promotion in these forums!
by Christin Sander 4 years ago
I know, we should write for both and I do, but the majority of my traffic comes from social media and lately I've stopped honestly caring about trying to figure out what Google wants. My highest ranking hubs for example do exceptionally well on Pinterest, FB etc. and get little to no Google...
by GA Anderson 6 months ago
Looking at the claimed biases of Google and Facebook, should these sites police their output for "Fake" news and such similarly labeled publishing?One caveat: Assume it is a "given" that "bot," (anybody's bot), output should be policed.For context of the biases...
by Kate Swanson 3 years ago
For those of you hoping you can ignore Google and become successful via the social networks, this survey is not good news:http://searchengineland.com/study-organ … l-5-202063Basically, for most websites, the search engines are still by far the biggest source of traffic, and social is a tiny...
by Jessie Watson 4 months ago
*Cortisol is a very common type of stress hormone released in the body generally following periods of anxiety and depression. Article: https://www.inquisitr.com/4850038/quitt … udy-shows/Cal Newport, an associate professor of Computer Science at Georgetown University has been trumpeting this...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|