workers in government

Jump to Last Post 1-13 of 13 discussions (25 posts)
  1. JON EWALL profile image59
    JON EWALLposted 14 years ago

    Just recently a report came out regarding employment.The report stated that the average pay in the private market was $40.00/hr. and the average pay in the public sector was $70/hr.

    In the public sector the fringe benefits also are higher.Could it be that in the public sector 50% of the workers are in unions.
    Maybe government needs to go back to the time when workers were considered civil service employees.

    Part of the problems in the country is that government continues to grow larger.One can imagine that if the union employee is being paid higher than the private sector, a correction must be made by governments.

    During the recession years 2008 and 2009 congress took their annual raises.Government workers got raises while the private marketplace went into a recession.

    It may be the time that the people should question their elected officials as to why government employees are exempt from a downward economy.

    Congress and the president failed in the first year of the Obama administration to get the jobs that he promised in the campaign for the presidency.

    1. Tadeusz598 profile image77
      Tadeusz598posted 14 years agoin reply to this

      The comparasion only makes much sense when you are comparing like job with like.

      In general, when you do that, you discover that actually private sector empolyment is better renumerated. Traditionally, people worked for the state because alothough it offered lower pay, it compensated by offering greater security of tenure.

      The reason the average pay in the state sector is higher is probably because state sector positions demand higher levels of educational attainment, while many private sector positions such as in retail and service require low skills levels. It may also be because state employees have greater union leverage.

      I would add also, that the private sector is often extremely mean towards lower level employees, paying them very badly, so badly, indeed that many have to hold down several jobs just to get by. That the state does not pay so ungenerously is surely intrinsically a good thing.

      And if those state employees have money to spend now then that is a good thing: they can visit shops and restaurants and employ private sector workers in these difficult times.

      It may be the time that the people should question why the private sector has been so disasterous. Why the private sector car industry, its banks and financial services have been so badly run?

      Obama had the misfortune to inherit Bush's legacy, a legacy so shameful that it will take years for the US economy to recover. So sniping at Obama is missing the point rather.

    2. profile image0
      cosetteposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      actually i have worked in both the public and private sector, and have always found that the government pays less than private companies. well, for technical positions anyway. much less.

    3. profile image0
      Ghost32posted 14 years ago

      I'd settle for figuring out where on Earth the average private sector pay comes out to $40 an hour in the first place.

      1. ngureco profile image80
        ngurecoposted 14 years agoin reply to this

        Once you collect taxes from the people, you have to return the same money back to the people using various outlets. One of the best political outlets is through government workers.

        The main decisions are made by government workers and if it was to happen you pay them less then the outcome will be that they will not leave any cent on the table for the private sector.

        1. GNelson profile image61
          GNelsonposted 13 years agoin reply to this

          Fretting about how much a working person makes is like beating the horse because the wheel broke.  Management needs to buy the grease and schedule the maintenance and they didn’t do it.  They take the credit when things are going great but blame the working guy when they screw it up.  Have you looked at their pay lately?  200 times the average worker and growing.   I don't hear much about that.

      2. skyfire profile image80
        skyfireposted 14 years ago

        Here in asia, government workers do corruption,bribe and do everything to eat green paper and nickel. 99.991% government workers are corrupted and if any wanna-be non-corrupted joins them then they take him down in all possible ways. Spot a non-corrupt worker in any asian government and you'll be millionaire.

      3. MikeNV profile image67
        MikeNVposted 14 years ago

        Then numbers don't add up.  I read a report posted in Yahoo Finance and this ABC News Article:

        "The average American this year made something like $37,000. Celebrities went into the stratosphere," said Parade Magazine editor Janice Kaplan.

        The Yahoo Finance article stated 75% of Americans make 60k a year or less.

        The work week is 8 hours a day x 50 weeks = 2,000 hours.  2 Weeks of vacation not included.

        So the math is pretty easy.

        $37,000 is $18.50 per hour not including benefits.

        1. WriteAngled profile image72
          WriteAngledposted 14 years agoin reply to this

          Two weeks vacation! I'm glad that's not me. As a freelance, I work 70+ hour weeks when I work, but I also have one or two long (3-4 day) weekends off most months, plus 4-5 holidays abroad for 1-2 weeks each time per year.

          Do US employers really only offer 2 weeks vacation? I thought I was hard done by as an employee in the UK when I had the rights to 5 weeks vacation per year.

          1. Cagsil profile image70
            Cagsilposted 14 years agoin reply to this

            Hey WriteAngled,

            Not everyone in America earns 2 weeks of vacation. It depends on other factors. Example: my mother where she works and your length of employment was giving her 4 weeks every year.

            Most average dead-end jobs get 2 weeks vacation, after 6 months - 1 year on the job. smile

            Hope that cleared it up. smile big_smile

            1. tobey100 profile image59
              tobey100posted 14 years agoin reply to this

              Wages, vacation time and hours worked can be very tricky mainly because what sounds really good isn't.  For example, I'm a salaried employee in law enforcement criminal investigation.  I make roughly $45 an hour, however, I work about 80 hours a week so even though my salary sounds great, i wind up making only about $18 an hour.  I get a 3 week vacation but so far haven't had one in 6 years.  thank God I like what I do.

      4. LaVieja profile image60
        LaViejaposted 14 years ago

        I'm moving to the States! I work in the public sector here in London and I can tell you that none of us get that amount!

      5. IzzyM profile image87
        IzzyMposted 14 years ago

        There are many people in the public sector overpaid, especially the bosses.
        If what was quoted was the average pay, then the office girl is on $3 per hour and her boss is on $200!
        Governments for a while during the 80s and 90s have been increasing public sector pay to try and match the private sector (to attract better recruits). Trouble is when the private sector went tits up, all the workers had to accept a pay cut but public sector retained their higher wages.

      6. brimancandy profile image76
        brimancandyposted 14 years ago

        I don't agree with any of these statistics. It is next to impossible to figure the average income of every working american verses those who work in goverment jobs.

        The only thing that may be true, is that the wages of governemnt workers may be going up slightly, while the pay of the average american worker is going down. Mainly because corporations are sending the message to workers that if they do not want to work for less money, they can pick up shop and move to a place like Mexico, and find people willing to work for a fraction of what workers are making today.

        Rates of pay in the private sector go up and down like a yoyo.
        Someone like me, who was once earning $23,000.00 a year, now has in income of $0. per year. So figure that in.

        You also have to consider all the corporate hot shots, and those getting rich overnite on the stock market. Someone who might have been rich last month, is now barely making any money.

        Also you have to consider where the people who come up with these numbers are getting their information. Certainly not from the entire workforce on either side. usually, they poll about 500 people on both sides to come up with their numbers.

        Those people do not include the unemployed, the homeless, or
        people working 3 jobs to get a $10,000.00 a year income, while trying to feed a family of 5. The media wouldn't even think to check there.

        So, when you read numbers like this, give Santa Claus a call and tell him you belive in him too. Because that is about as true as this information is.

      7. LeanMan profile image80
        LeanManposted 14 years ago

        In the UK 51% of the working population is now employed in the public sector, I can't remember the figure for the US, but it is not far behind.
        My background is business improvement within the private sector but then went to do consultancy paid for by the UK government.
        I have never seen so many people in my life with jobs that add zero value to the economy and with highly inflated wages far beyond what they could earn in the private sector.
        There appears to be no control and no concern over how the money is spent, after all it is the "governments" money not theirs! They have no idea of the real world!
        But there appears to be two tiers, those that have the basic jobs that earn less or similar to the private sector, but management jobs are well in excess of the private sector!

        I also worked within education in a voluntary position and became involved in purchasing lighting for tennis courts for the school, the same as for street lighting.
        The company that i was working for had purchased the same lights and the local council regularly purchased these lights from the same company. The price to the government TEN times higher than the private company! No one cares what they spend!

        1. profile image0
          LegendaryHeroposted 14 years agoin reply to this

          The US is only 17%.

      8. tobey100 profile image59
        tobey100posted 14 years ago

        Simple, their bosses have no need to worry about the bottom line and there's no competition.  They have no worries regarding profit or sales.  It's not their money they throw's yours.

      9. LeanMan profile image80
        LeanManposted 14 years ago

        A little more.....

        It is competition that drives improvement, what competition is there in government, what driver is there to become better at what they do and spend less money doing it?

        Without any competition there is no need to do things efficiently, no need to spend less, where else can the customer go?

        1. tobey100 profile image59
          tobey100posted 14 years agoin reply to this

          Wish I'd said that.  You've nailed it

          1. LeanMan profile image80
            LeanManposted 14 years agoin reply to this

            You're welcome!

            This is why they have tried to introduce competion between different areas of the UK health service, in some areas it is actually working with regard to improvements in efficiency but has not yet impacted wages (If they paid less the people would just leave to a different area as no shortage of posts)

            Two of my good friends have gone from working in industry applying lean and six sigma to the health service and are making some huge improvements, but there are many many years to go yet..

        2. sir slave profile image59
          sir slaveposted 13 years ago

          It is because businesses are greedy, and the government(us)
          is less greedy!  I know that sounds oversimplfied
          and there are other reasons, but that is one major underlying factor.  the culture of stingyness being copied and passed aound like used toilet paper!!

          1. Jim Hunter profile image61
            Jim Hunterposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            Yeah, thats it roll

        3. profile image60
          logic,commonsenseposted 13 years ago

          Just wondering, why does the White House need a staff of 300?!
          Wow!  That is just insane!

          1. Jim Hunter profile image61
            Jim Hunterposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            Somebody has to carry Michelle's luggage.

        4. profile image60
          logic,commonsenseposted 13 years ago

          That and there is  a lot of BS to clean up after! smile


        This website uses cookies

        As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

        For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

        Show Details
        HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
        LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
        Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
        AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
        HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
        HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
        Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
        CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
        Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
        Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
        Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
        Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
        Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
        Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
        VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
        PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
        Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
        MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
        Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
        Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
        Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
        SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
        Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
        Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
        AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
        OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
        Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
        TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
        Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
        Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
        Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
        Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
        ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
        Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
        ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)