HubPages added a lot of Squidoo pages - yet the Quantcast traffic indicates it has returned to the average pattern of all this year. Net gain - exactly nothing. Let's hope they didn't part with any money.
So what if?
What if HubPages stop talking about QAP and start really doing it.
There is endless rubbish on this site from years ago that should no longer be here.
Get the bright one in the office to delete all the non-performing pages - less than 5 visits a month say. People can take them elsewhere. That should take an hour to do.
Next up - police that Amazon / eBay limit and link-out limit properly. ENFORCE IT. No need for pretty please and smiles on top - just set the rule and delete the lot.
That would be another hours worth of coding.
And - non-English with too many howlers - for goodness sake - get rid!!!
The traffic 'quota' that Janderson refers to would probably mean the overall traffic remains the same BUT maybe Google would see some genuine attempt to clean up the stable.
Agreed. I can't understand why HubPages is putting money into editors - if they'd put the same number of people on to clearing out the obvious trash, they'd get rid of an enormous amount in a short time.
Even simple things - I noticed someone posting about finding Hubs on m@sturbation, for instance. If we can find them with a simple search, why can't HP put a staff member on to doing those searches and bulk deleting all the offending Hubs they find?
The Amazon/eBay limit IS policed, but from everything Paul E says, it's obvious that one product per 50 words is still too generous. So lift the limit - make it one product per 150 words, say.
That's a good example of what I was mentioning on another thread - on the internet, when someone mentions a problem, it gets exaggerated.
There is nothing wrong with Amazon or eBay capsules per se. I have hundreds of eBay ads on my blogs which have never had a tremor from Panda (touching wood as I say that!). The key is that they have to be completely and utterly relevant to the text and helpful to the reader. I think 50 words per product is too low, because what can you really say about something in 50 words? But 2 capsules per article is unnecessarily strict.
Mark Ewbie's concern for quality hubpages is okay. But, I can't agree with his suggestion of deleting the articles below 5 views a month. You can not measure quality by views. Traffic gets flown by glitters and superfluous makeups. You can't judge things by the traffic. You should see the quality. Quality articles should be retained whether they receive traffic or not.
All other suggestions are okay. And I support the suggestion of allowing only 2, 3 ads per article to maintain the importance of the content and to prevent distractions.
by Sherry Hewins3 days ago
I knew it couldn't be that good forever, but I am concerned that it's Healdove that seems to be getting hit.
by Will Apse4 years ago
In his hub 'What We Don't Know About Google Panda?', Paul Edmondson points out that Google seems to expect sites to leap high above any bar that might reasonably be set for quality purposes.Paul seems less than happy...
by Steve Andrews4 years ago
When it was first introduced I was annoyed by it but made an effort to tweak my hubs to get them out of Idle status. Now, a whole load have got zzs against them again and many of them are hubs that at one point were...
by Dr. John Anderson2 years ago
Recently Paul E http://hubpages.com/forum/topic/132583#post2758981 stated that he has considered: "splitting HubPages into one version that is high service and another that is very lightly moderated" but for...
by topclass4 years ago
Many good quality pages are Idled (become unfeatured) via ‘Analysis of the how engaged readers are with a Hub over an extended period of time’ – essentially because they get low traffic.It appears that this...
by Susan W3 years ago
I suppose with the latest Google Panda update and all the low traffic we've been getting, I guess it's time to start writing more hubs. While I wasn't affected too badly by the update, I still want to increase my...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.