Can anyone tell me why this hub has gone from 'Editor's Choice' to 'not featured - quality'? It ticks all the boxes: http://daisychain.hubpages.com/hub/gizzards
Many thanks for any enlightenment.
In the Learning Center I found this info. http://hubpages.com/learningcenter/Featured-Hubs
HubPages blog: "Update to the Quality Assessment Process: Improving the quality of ALL Hubs!" http://blog.hubpages.com/2013/05/
ADDED: Sometimes quality hubs are unfeatured due to traffic. Was this hub getting search engine traffic?
Hi, colorfulone, it was getting a lot of traffic for my hubs - one of the best performers so it can't be that otherwise all my hubs would be unfeatured. Pleased to find you here in the Squidoo afterlife and thanks for leaving a message.
It's another case of one hand does not know what the other is doing at HP. If an editor deemed it worthy of the EC designation, and a QAP rater deemed it low quality, I think you should contact HP. That's pretty ridiculous.
Sorry for the confusing and possibly frustrating experience.
Regarding your Hub's Editor's Choice status, we have increased the review rate of Editor's Choice Hubs, which may mean that some Hubs will lose their EC designation. Please visit this post for more information.
We sent you an email from the team inbox a few minutes ago with additional details. Hope this helps! Feel free to respond to that email if you have more questions/concerns.
This is new news to me, didn't realize. Although I'm opted out of EC, I'm curious and need to clarify. You said some EC designations have been lost because the rating criteria has increased which means some will lose the honor? But I also read the link you posted which stated that when this new criteria was implemented, some hubbers lost their designations by mistake. So is it both? Was this change in response to the uproar several weeks ago about the unfairness of EC designations in 'Related Hubs?' Thanks.
Thank you all for your advice. Yes, frustrating to have to play the 'what's up' guessing game but it seemed to be the ads that were causing the problem. Difficult to know, once the yellow warning notice has gone, how many ads and what sort of ads are acceptable. Anyone who has ever prepared gizzards will know that a very sharp knife is essential - knife ad gone.
I very much appreciate the prompt feedback and the emails.
It seems to me like the left hand does not know what the right hand is doing! Id it did then the whole site would perform better.
Google seem to have rattled the owners so much that they run around like chickens with their heads cut off. Which is probably not an acceptable comment anymore, but you get my drift?
by Marina 5 years ago
This week we will begin assessing older Hubs that haven't yet gone through the Quality Assessment Process. Instead of only holding newly-published Hubs to the heightened quality bar introduced in March, ALL published Hubs will need to meet minimum quality requirements in order to remain or become...
by Gary Anderson 3 years ago
I thought if a hubpage was listed in Google search it was featured. But apparently that is not the truth. I guess I will keep the hubs up and run my own check on them.
by Dr. John Anderson 6 years ago
The purpose of this post is NOT to moan and groan, but rather to better understand it, by sharing your insight and experiences. Obviously we now have to work using its parameters. Stayin' Alive Ha Ha Ha
by Andrew C Ross 5 years ago
I see this message when my Hub is rejected: "Heads up! It looks like your Hub is not cleared for publication because it did not pass the Quality Assessment Process. No need to fret; every new Hubber goes through Boot Camp, and all you need to do is improve the Hub so that it meets our quality...
by Chang Lee 2 years ago
Hi Hubbers,I'd like some help with passing the Quality Assessment Process. Will you please give feedback on my Hub Gift Inspiration - Themed with Doggie, Cat, Horse or Owl by Alex Clark (must be signed in to view). What can I do to improve? Thanks!Few more questions; 1. Are 5 featured hubs required...
by Raye 5 years ago
http://blog.hubpages.com/2013/04/five-f … b-barrier/The new blog post that just went up today really caught my eye. The crux: "Until you have published five simultaneously-Featured Hubs, new Hubs that do not pass the Quality Assessment Process (QAP) will be unpublished rather...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|