The picture showing Queen Elizabeth and Michelle Obama with their arms around each other is ubiquitous on the web. I have a blog paralleling President Obama's First 100 Days in Office and our 100 days of being laid off back in 2009 that I'm making into an ebook. In one of the postings, I used this picture,(hope it shows up here) but now that I am making the blog into an ebook, I want to be sure I'm not violating copyright laws. I found the image that I had posted years ago recently on an old article on huffingtonpost and emailed them about permission. They said the picture came from pinterest (??? - shocking) and I should go there to find the permission I need. I don't know how that would work first of all and second of all I don't trust that someone posting it on pinterest had permission. Should I not worry about it since I'll be lucky if I sell 10 of my ebooks or ????
You need to ask the copyright holder for permission before using the image.
Given that this picture is almost certainly owned by a major news photo vendor I would worry about it, and just not use it.
psycheskinner, May I whine like a little kid, "But I wanna! " I would like to find out if I can purchase a license for the use of this picture. When I first posted it in 2009, I saw the photographer's name, but now I can't find it - not that I can afford it. My whole little essay about this is important, I believe, and it is the only illustration that portrays exactly what I wanted. This picture is used so much all over the web, I can't believe everyone and their brother who has used it had permission, but I do understand that is possible. Maybe I should hire an artist to illustrate this picture. Thanks Psyche Skinner
It is from video copyright BBC News 24, apparently--they do not seem to sell their footage.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic … tocol.html
I just emailed them. Maybe they'll supply another breadcrumb on the trail of finding out who ownes with picture. So now that's two newspapers I've contacted. Next, the BBC - ugh!
Ah, I emailed dailymail, but I MUST email the BBC. You're exactly right as can be seen on the bottom left in this picture (Well, if you have a magnifying glass - that's what it says:)
It seems to be a still from a videographer rather than a photo. The Mail are marking it as from the BBC 24 channel.
I did a little bit of research and it appears the PICTURE was (possibly) initially published on April 2, 2009 by csmonitor.com. A VIDEO by CNN with the action of them embracing was published on youtube March 26, 2009 and is titled, First lady's surprising hug from the Queen of England.
Tip: Go to images.google.com and you will see a small camera on the search bar - click on the camera. Upload the image you are researching and any matching images will be cited. You can usually narrow it down to the initial publication and copyright holder. Good luck on your research and publication.
Misolive, That's a great little operation to see where the images are used. I did that and again, this image was used on sooo many websites without attribution, that I can't find the initial publication. When I right click to "inspect" image all I get, of course, is the address of where it sits on the blogger or newpaper or whoever's site has published it. Thank you for that hint, though. I think I'll use that all the time to see all the places where the image is used. Usually I type in the subject of the image and click on "images" in google, but this is a much more efficent and directed search.
yes, images.google.com is a cool little feature and it comes in pretty handy. As for the picture - my guess is the initial image is from a screenshot of the CNN video. Their video is the earliest publication I could find. It appears CNN owns the image.
on the bottom of the image I was able to find it says copyright bbc 24 - so now I'm emailing THEM ! I'm hopeful that this has been around long enough, they might give me permission or let me pay for use (?) I'll post the results here (hopefully within the next 6 months - tee hee)
Just keep in mind that CNN published the video BEFORE the BBC published the screenshot.
miss olive, thanks for this bit of information.
I have followed those instructions with a photo from one of my hubs, just to see what came up.
The only copy of that photograph is in Pinterest. To find out more about it I will have to sign into Pinterest.
I know virtually nothing about that site. What is it? What is it for? If I sign in, will I get bombarded with stuff that I don't want? Why would they be using it?
If anyone belongs to Pinterest and wants to look at the photo in question I am happy to post it here.... but you can see it in my hub about mulch filters. It shows water cascading into the mulch filter, with an old hubcap in the center. If you can enlighten me, I would be grateful.
This is really useful information, MissOlive. Thank you.
Not surprising the B.B.C. is responsible for this footage! Mrs Obama here has committed
a serious breech of Royal protocol by even daring to touch our Queen, notice how Her Majesty is merely only gesturing not embracing the woman, as the Queen is too much of a Lady toward her guests. Fortunately the B.B.C. has not lowered itself to the level of the 'gutter press' with outrageous accusations over some hi jinx a (then) 4 year old Princess Elizabeth had as a child, plus the slanderous rant of a 'wanna be' comedian.
limpet, Regarding the recent accusations of the 4 year old Princess Elizabeth, I agree that it's outrageous. I'm viewing a 4 CD video of the History of the United States by Oliver Stone with live footage and it's shocking. We forget that in the very beginning government officials and world leaders didn't know what to think about Hitler. It was inconceiveable to them that he was about to embark on one of the unbelievable, disgusting genocides in the history of mankind. It was disingenuous to drag that picture out, out of context of the times.
Regarding THIS photo, as an American, I saw it in a whole different light. My essay was doing a whole comparison of Maya Angelo's poem "And Still I Rise" and class and privilege and the disparity of wealth as it's felt in the US. Of course, sometimes I'm shocked at my OWN breech of even COMMMON "protocol". I imagine at the very least, I could try to not wear jeans everywhere I go or attempt to do a decent job of combing through my Brillo-pad hair before going out in public (tee hee). Maybe the Queen at her age, like me at my age, is thinking "Oh, what the heck...Let's just go with it" Thank you for your perspective.
I'm surprised by this photo as it's strictly against protocol for anyone to touch the Queen. Are you sure it's not a fake pic?
Glennis, Way back in 2009 when I saw this picture, I am sure that in that room were a score of photographers. I think there might be several shots of this photo, one of which is from a video. The video is on youtube. This is not a fake picture, I believe, because it was used by news agencies all over the world. (Well, maybe THAT doesn't prove anything, tee hee).
It's not fake. There was quite an uproar at the time, and images are available from other angles: https://goo.gl/NXdgU5
I'd check a few of the US Government sites. I'm sure there were probably official photographers there that day, and while the picture might be from a slightly different angle, at least you'll be able to use it.
I'd try USA.Gov first.
Chris, I tried that. There are none in the archives that show that pose. Every one I found is from the front OR if there is one from the back, it's not BOTH their arms around each other and that is critical for my essay on class, privilege, power, wealth, and what felt at the time as a brand new day. Thanks though. I still haven't heard from ANY of the news agencies and the Huffington Post apparently got it from PINTEREST of all things because that's where they referred me. I can't find it there, but I should look again.
Did you check pictures and videos? You can always just pull a frame out of a video and use that.
This was one of- if not the first, foreign trips for President Obama (I'm pretty sure it was during his first G20), and it was his first time meeting Queen Elizabeth as President, there is no way that there wasn't official film/photography there.
Chris, I did find the video on youtube and did pull out a frame. I can use that? Really? That would solve a big problem for me.
Error; in my previous posting i gave H.R.H. Princess Elizabeth's age as 4, should be 7 at the time of that occurrence. Sorry that i got off topic as the 'main thread' is about intellectual property rights. The British monarchy has indeed tried to adjust to the 21st century by getting closer to the public in line with other Kings and Queens in Europe who have been familiar with their subjects for generations.
limpet, Thanks for the clarification. I think It's fun and informative to discuss different viewpoints thoughtout the world. Like so many other Americans of my generation who were born here, I have never been outside of the US. My world view is very narrow. Cheers.
by John Lannoye 4 years ago
Hi, all,I'm posting this to share that I recently shelled out $1,600 for a photo I didn't have copyright to use. Let me explain so that this never happens to you.Several years ago, I grabbed a picture off Pinterest and used it on my private blog with a post. Last year, I got a series of letters...
by ruthwalker 8 years ago
Hi there, joined HP a little while ago but only just got round to writing my first hub. It is going to be an historical piece but seem to be spending most of my time trying to find who owns copyright to the images I would like to use, which are all dated between 1920's and 1950's, and then trying...
by lee 4 years ago
I have not used hubpages for around a year and have recently started to get back into it, I must admit that in the beginning I was a little Naive and posted images into my hubs willy nilly without thought of where they came from. I have recently recieved an email from a photo place saying that I...
by tamron 8 years ago
I looked everywhere on bing but can't find if the images can be used or not and if they can be used who do you give credit too Bing or the link?
by Ellen 10 years ago
Okay, Hubpages. I was giving you all kinds of love because you have a track record of being sensitive to copyright issues. Because of that, I'd started posting my original photo essays here even though they make more money elsewhere.Now, you've joined the ranks of sites more concerned about...
by ofmelancholy 12 years ago
Picture covers bon jovi by the way.
Copyright © 2022 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of Maven Coalition, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|