Surely Best should consist of only the best writing. If so, why are these Hubs not all Editors Choice Hubs? Latest should consist only of all recently published Hubs which have passed the QA. Hot should be those Hubs which are currently receiving traffic.
The forum and questions should be in their own category far away from the public eye. Any comments made on the forum over a year old should be deleted from the site as these old threads are being re-opened even when they are no longer relevant.
Well said Sally. I hope the HP staff read these suggestions and take notice.
Spot on, Sally. Good on you ! I so agree with what you say.
I absolutely agree with all comments above - which is an edited version of what you said - basic principles - definitely Yes!
Many writers choose to opt-out for Editors Choice. It's bad enough their work is no longer considered for Hub of the Day. I wouldn't like to see them left out of "Best" as well.
Otherwise, I think you make some good points.
Perhaps they might like to consider it if their Hubs were to be shown with the so, called 'Best' but you do make a very valid point, one I had not considered because I opted in. Thank you for sharing that.
Maybe they would, but I don't know that the benefits of being included in "Best" would outweigh the negatives of having a successful Hub re-indexed with a new url.
As regards Editors Choice, I have about seventeen, none of which perform any better as far as I am aware than they did when they were first written. They are spread throughout my stats though none can be found at the bottom end of my stats. It makes it harder I think for the owners of this site to make a decision on how to split the wheat from the chaff should they ever decide to do so. How much easier it might have been for them had the so called 'Best' all been in one basket:)
@Sallybea The feedback from Hubbers has been great. Thank you.
Expect to see higher quality latest Hubs soon. Our system is somewhat complex in that we need to train our system to set the bars where we want them and that takes a few weeks. The tweaks we are working on include more emphasis on grammar and spelling, more details (substance), plus some more subtle improvements to how we rate new Hubs. This should help with the latest list quite a bit.
One thing I'm excited about, is we can see signs that the community is interacting and encouraging Hubbers in ways I didn't anticipate (in a very good way) by putting latest Hubs front and center.
Another side note. Traffic to the homepage has been reshuffled, but the net is a lot more people are coming to the home page and to topic pages now.
As always we are reading lots of Hubber comments and working on several things. Thanks again for the comments.
There is certainly a mixed bag of things happened on HP. However, I have to agree with you Saly. Why would they put anything but the best under "Best". Certainly a poor representation of our site.
It seems little by little we are losing our beloved HP!
I reckon it is up to us, time to start building the bricks back up again. There has been far too much negativity lately. I value this site, I appreciate the fact that I am earning a residual income from it and I really don't want that to come to an end..
I would be totally heartbroken if HP went away. It has been a great place for me to test my writing, learn how to improve and share the friendship of so many wonderful people sailing in the same boats!
The last time Hot Hubs were viewable, many writers didn't like how having their traffic success pointed out made their hot content the most stolen and spun.
So this feature was removed.
How is this whole situation not going to just repeat itself now that this feature exists once again?
That is really interesting. I did not know about that or the effect it had on the site. I think we will just have to wait and see whether Paul and the team can strike the right balance. Right now it is not a good showcasing the best writing, These writers need to reap the benefits and rewards which come from their effort.
It is much exciting to see these kind of discussions going on here. I appreciate Sallybea for moving this discussion and our hubbers participating in it . Each and every response casted some new light on the topic. And Paul Edmundson's assurance is quite a relief that they are doing something to set things right on track.
I particularly feel much embarrassed at the "latest" feed appearing on our homepage, as almost all of you agree, at the way the old feeds are popping up as latest threads due to some random, unmindful activity of one of us not knowing the consequences of it.
I appreciate the support, thank you so much and to everyone else, please contribute to this discussion, let us make it a positive one and make each opinion count.
by Christin Sander 2 years ago
Which free WordPress themes have the best features?I am starting another new site using WordPress to sell items I make that can be customized. I don't want to invest in a custom theme just yet and I am wondering what free themes are the most customizable and user friendly? I like the Oprum...
by Carolee Samuda 3 years ago
Why is it that some writers do not respond to individual comments on their hubs?I noticed this with some writers who have been on HP for two years or more. They will choose to respond directly to some comments and ignore the others. Doesn't it make you feel like not commenting on these writers...
by RocketCityWriter 9 months ago
Is it rude to point out grammar/spelling mistakes on hubs via comments?I've come across numerous hubs that have grammar and spelling errors, some minor and some littered with mistakes. Otherwise, these hubs would be interesting and will written in my opinion. Is it rude to point out these mistakes...
by Haunty 9 years ago
I find that most of the comments on hp are either thanking or reassuring the writer. I think hubbers believe it's worth more petting the writer on the back than telling him or her if something feels wrong. This way we might miss great opportunities to give our fellow hubber a chance to 1. see...
by carol stanley 15 months ago
Do you continue to read hubs of those you follow if they don't comment on your hubs?When you have limited time do you just comment on those who regularly comment on your hubs?
by Tessa Schlesinger 8 months ago
I was quite stunned a week or more ago when someone made a statement on one of my hubs that she had commented twice and I had snubbed her by not replying. Her comment had been particularly flattering, and probably because I've spent a lifetime being flattered by others only to find that they wanted...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|