Are editbots useful/helpful?

Jump to Last Post 1-7 of 7 discussions (15 posts)
  1. vocalcoach profile image94
    vocalcoachposted 7 years ago

    I find these to be distracting and a waste of time. My time is limited on hub pages and I prefer to use this time reading/writing hubs. Please share your thoughts.  Thanks.

    1. Marisa Wright profile image90
      Marisa Wrightposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      The point with editbots is that they have already made the corrections for you, so if you're happy with their corrections, you don't need to do anything. 

      I went through my Hubs when they first came out and found that 95% of the corrections were fine.  Sometimes it had changed a perfectly correct spelling to another alternative, but it was still correct so I didn't mind.  So now I just ignore them.

      1. Faith Reaper profile image84
        Faith Reaperposted 7 years agoin reply to this

        Yes, being they are already corrected, nothing to do except take time to check if one wants to check.  Initially, the editbots were a distraction, but I guess I am used to them now, and plus knowing they are correcting necessary typos, is a good thing for ranking.  Most are in comments, but I did find one that the editbot needed to be unchecked, as it was a hubber's name and possessive.  That is understandable that it would not be able to read that correctly.

      2. vocalcoach profile image94
        vocalcoachposted 7 years agoin reply to this

        Thanks Marisa.  Appreciated your comments. Good point.

      3. Sherry Hewins profile image92
        Sherry Hewinsposted 7 years agoin reply to this

        Even though Editbot is correct the vast majority of the time,  it does make mistakes. If you have few errors, it does not take much time to check them. I found one mistake that I felt made going back to check worthwhile fof me.

        1. Marisa Wright profile image90
          Marisa Wrightposted 7 years agoin reply to this

          On the other hand - even if you discover the black editbot has got it wrong once or twice, you still have far fewer errors in your comments than you did without them!   

          So yes, I guess I could go through and check all the Hubs and get all the comments perfect, but I'm happy to let the editbots do the work because the accuracy is still far better than it was without them.

          1. Sherry Hewins profile image92
            Sherry Hewinsposted 7 years agoin reply to this

            The one mistake I was talking about was in the article itself. They had changed a name "Peter Noone" to Peter no one. In comments, I wouldn't care so much.

  2. SusanDeppner profile image75
    SusanDeppnerposted 7 years ago

    Hi Vocalcoach.

    Once I got through the editbots initially, they haven't bothered me a bit.

    I had very few personal errors, though there might have been one or two that actually did need correcting, which became a good excuse to update the hub. Most of my bot hits were in comments.

    Bottom line, I'd say they've been helpful and have taken, overall, very little of my time.

    Now, back to writing...

  3. Glenn Stok profile image96
    Glenn Stokposted 7 years ago

    Most editbot hits are with comments. The corrections it makes help a great deal. In the past I used to delete comments that were written with very poor grammar or misspellings. I found that my hubs did better with Google traffic when I deleted poorly written comments.

    Google evidently ranks on anything on the page since it does't know a comment from the main text.

    If it goes as planned, now with editbot, we would get better ranking without the need to delete poorly written comments.

    So it's definitely not a waste of time.

  4. Jodah profile image90
    Jodahposted 7 years ago

    Audrey, It was time consuming initially, going through all my hubs to check and have the editbot symbols disappear, but as the great majority of correction were in comments I was quite pleased they were corrected without me having to do that. Once they were all gone they haven't returned. All in all probably a positive thing in regard to our staus on Google.

  5. profile image0
    Bob Bambergposted 7 years ago

    I have always written headlines for eye appeal and content for how it resonates with the average reader, so I really struggle with the concept of writing to appeal to a search engine.  I've had a few white editbots and appreciate those because I want my writing to be error-free.  But I'm not concerned about the black editbots, and don't think the search engines should be either. 

    We're writing on the world stage and comments come from people to whom English is a second language, so it's expected that their grammar and spelling not be perfect.  That's part of what being human is all about.  I really find the "un-human" (I'll bet that generates an editbot) part of online activity distasteful. 

    The more impersonal it gets, the less time I spend here.  I have a weekly newspaper column that I enjoy writing much more than this.  Things might be different if I understood the technology more, but frankly I don't have enough interest to even try to learn.  For a while, I was updating unfeatured hubs, but even that's low on my priority list now.

    Search engines aren't kind to people who just like to write stuff that appeals to humans.

    1. Jodah profile image90
      Jodahposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      I agree Bob, if Google is as sophisticated as it i supposed to be, surely it should be able to differentiate article content from comments. Comments should not figure in any ratings or reflect on the quality of the article in any way. But everything I have read unfortunately says it does, so until that changes I guess we just have to live with it.

  6. paradigmsearch profile image59
    paradigmsearchposted 7 years ago

    Even though there are zero errors, I have 2 editbots that still refuse to go away. They have now become pets.

    1. vocalcoach profile image94
      vocalcoachposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      LOL!  Love your attitude.

  7. Nanciajohnson profile image72
    Nanciajohnsonposted 7 years ago

    I have lots of editbot friends and guess I should take some time to read through to make sure the corrections make sense.  I have almost no time lately for writing or rewriting so everything just sits.


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)