Did HubPages provide an explanation regarding why you can no longer easily share a Hub on Twitter using a button on the Hub? Why did they replace it with Flipboard?
Probably just trying to find the balance between button clutter and social media sites that work. Perhaps their data show Flipboard is more effective than Twitter. They also removed the button to share a hub with your followers internally on HubPages.
I'm surprised the email button made the cut over Twitter. By the way, when you click the email button does anything happen on your screen? I have tested it several times on different browsers, different niche sites, and nothing happens. It's a dud for me.
Yes, it opens giving one a choice of sending the email from your own email addresses.
Thanks Sally. I wonder why nothing happens when I click it. Oh well, I never email HP links anyway.
It seems to me that you don't have that choice anymore. The email will go direct from your own email account/s though perhaps you can still send one via the fan mail button. I will have to take a look.
Mine opens to Microsoft Outlook. All the email queues I have ever used always have. So, I don't know what that means if one does not have Outlook.
Do you have an email program on your computer? Some people just use web-based emailing. If you don't have an email client (program) then the button won't be able to do anything.
It opens your email with the title of the hub in the subject and the content pre-filled with "I thought you might enjoy this article" followed by the link to the hub.
I'm guessing that the button doesn't work with web-based email. I don't see how it can.
My email button is not working either. I never email Hubs (kind of the old way of sharing info compared to social media). I used the Twitter share button quite a lot. Not sure why they felt the need to make it harder to share Hubs via Twitter. Another head scratcher from the HubPages staff.
They dropped the Twitter button because it historically brought less traffic than the other sharing options. In addition, they noticed that Flipboard was bringing much more traffic than Twitter. That's why they made the change.
See Christy's post on that at http://hubpages.com/forum/post/2858647
Thanks Glenn. I am still trying to get up to speed using Flipboard.
Did you see my Flipboard tutorial? Maybe it will help.
Dropping the Twitter link from Hubs seems short-sighted to me. Twitter has a certain amount of presence on the Internet that having Hubs from HubPages tweeted and retweeted provides value to the HubPages brand that could bring in additional viewers and writers. I know if I start seeing the same site being tweeted on Twitter or cited elsewhere on mainstream Internet sites, such as Facebook, I take notice and start looking at the site more closely. In fact, I joined HubPages all those years ago because I came across a Hub that someone had posted on Facebook. I think removing the Twitter link is a good example of the poor marketing prowess of those who run HubPages.
Really, I had not even noticed. I have done nothing with it for ages but would love Twitter back.
This forum thread is six months old. Flipboard was also removed after I left that comment because too few people were using the button. The overhead of share buttons was not worth it. Speed of page loads is more important for SEO. You can still tweet and flip hubs directly or with their browser add on.
An auto-tweet from the HubPages site contains no more than a link and a title. If people actually care to engage with the Twitter community, they'll go through the process of using Twitter itself or an app to upload a nice image, a relevant hashtag, and a attention grabbing title, instead of just dumping a link on Twitter like a spammer and having little else to do with Twitter.
Honestly, if someone just dumps their links on Twitter and doesn't interact with their followers in any other way, I'll block the person.
A decent explanation, but like I said short-sighted. Seeing articles show up in people's Twitter feeds gives a site a certain level of credibility and draws in new viewers.
Kind of odd timing too, since Twitter is becoming such an important part of discourse these days with very high-profile public figures using the social media site to put out their views. Twitter is going from irrelevant to something that people are paying more attention to and hearing about every day. What is HubPages doing to expand their presence on this hot social networking and newsfeed site? Apparently running in the opposite direction, by making it less convenient for its writers to post links on Twitter.
Hubbers really shouldn't be sharing their hubs on Twitter, Pinterest unless they fully understand the dynamics of those social media sites. In fact, I believe at some point HubPages staff came out and said they discourage it.
A link here and there is okay, but a hubber whose Twitter feed only contains links to their hubs is a spammer. This hurts HubPages way more than it helps it.
I agree with you there. Personally, I use Twitter for just about everything except sharing Hubs. Mainly, I use it to follow weather developments, as you can get a lot of inside info that you can't get elsewhere from mainstream weather sources. But, from a marketing perspective, I'd want a presence on Twitter, if I was HubPages. Becoming a known commodity on a site like Twitter has some upside benefits.
You have 26,700 Twitter followers melbel? That's quite impressive. Much more than I usually see, unless it's some celebrity of some sort.
To amplify what Glenn said: I noticed when I added Share buttons to my blog, the load time dropped drastically. Investigating, I discovered that each button adds a piece of code, and each extra bit of code slows the load time of the page a bit more.
One of the criteria Google uses to rank a website is load time - so it's very important to get your site loading as fast as possible. Share buttons are worth the penalty if your readers like them and use them - if they're not, then they're slowing your site down for no reason, and it's best to get rid of them.
The other point - if readers really like an article, they will share it anyway, with or without the buttons. The buttons are a convenient way for writers to share their own Hubs BUT that's another reason not to have them. HubPages regularly gets banned from sites like Pinterest because too many Hubbers mindlessly over-share their own Hubs.
by Glenn Stok 2 years ago
I noticed tonight that the Flipboard share button is missing on all hubs. I checked a few niche sites and they are all missing. It doesn't matter if you're logged in or not. In addition, the problem I reported a few weeks ago with Pinterest banning ToughNickel is still not fixed.
by Wendy Iturrizaga 9 years ago
Hello everyone, I've just come back from a few days in the mountains to find that once again you have outdone yourselves and we have another very successful HubMob with almost 60 Hubs on Charities. Thank you to every single one of you who took part in last week's HubMob. As I came back...
by Jason Menayan 3 years ago
We added the Pinterest "Pin It" button to the small collection of popular social-sharing buttons at the top of Hubs on Thursday. Pinterest has rapidly become one of the largest social media traffic drivers to HubPages, already substantially larger than Twitter and Reddit. Maddie wrote a...
by Don Bobbitt 2 years ago
I don't get into these fights and disagreements with what HP does on a regular basis. But I looked at my Hubs and I only saw the four sites; Flipboard, Pinterest, Facebook and email in my share icons over the past week or so. What happened to G+ ?????This one doesn't make sense to me considering...
by Zsuzsy Bee 10 years ago
It's been a while since we had a thread about your own favorite hub, the one you think is your best. How about you give us a link here so we can all read it. (It's okay to self promote here)
by Eugene Brennan 2 years ago
Just wanted to share this. Someone pinned or "flipped" one of my hubs on Flipboard, a magazine site. So I've had a ton of traffic all morning. I made my own magazine and the traffic magnified even more! (currently 16 visits per minute). Might be worth looking into as an alternative...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|